Metacognition and learner autonomy : a case study on the learning experiences of self-taught bilingual CSRs at a call center.

dc.contributor.advisorToro Vargas, Jhonatanspa
dc.contributor.authorDíaz Rivera, Andrés Felipe
dc.coverage.spatialBogotá, Colombiaspa
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-14T20:23:36Z
dc.date.available2024-03-14T20:23:36Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.description.abstractEste documento presenta el informe final del estudio de caso cualitativo titulado “Metacognición y Autonomía del Alumno: un estudio de caso sobre las experiencias de aprendizaje de RSC bilingües autodidactas en un call center”, el cual se llevó a cabo con un grupo de 6 hablantes de inglés autodidactas no nativos que trabajan como representantes de servicio al cliente en un call center bilingüe. El principal objetivo del estudio fue indagar sobre el papel de la metacognición y la autonomía del alumno en la experiencia de aprendizaje del idioma inglés de los participantes. Los métodos para la recopilación de datos fueron cuestionarios y grabaciones de vídeo presentados en The Metacognitive Awareness Inventory (MAI) de Schraw, G. & Dennison, R.S. (1994)., The Strategy Inventory for Language Learning (SILL) de Oxford, R (1986), The Semi-structured Interview for self-taught non-native English Speakers diseñada por el investigador mismo basándose en el MAI. El análisis y la triangulación de los datos mostraron que todos los participantes tenían altos niveles de conciencia metacognitiva (LOMA), lo que significa que todos eran expertos en conocerse profundamente a sí mismos como estudiantes en términos metacognitivos. Además, también se encontró que, entre las diferentes estrategias de aprendizaje de idiomas propuestas por Oxford, las Estrategias Metacognitivas fueron las más preferidas por los participantes. Además, se encontró que la metacognición y la autonomía del alumno estaban presentes principalmente en términos de un fuerte sentido de compromiso y responsabilidad por el proceso de aprendizaje al hacer que los participantes tomaran el control de su proceso de aprendizaje de idiomas como conocedores y reguladores de este. Por otro lado, se encontró que la regulación del proceso de aprendizaje en aspectos de planificación y evaluación fue el más desafiante de la experiencia de aprendizaje para la mayoría de los participantes.spa
dc.description.abstractenglishThis document presents a final report of the qualitative case study titled “Metacognition and Learner Autonomy: a case study on the learning experiences of self-taught bilingual CSRs at a call center”, which was carried out with a group of 6 self-taught non-native English speakers who work as customer service representatives at a bilingual call center. The main objective of the study was to inquire about the role of metacognition and Learner Autonomy in the English Language Learning Experience of the participants. The methods for data collection were questionnaires and video-recordings in the shape of The Metacognitive Awareness Inventory (MAI) by Schraw, G. & Dennison, R.S. (1994)., The Strategy Inventory for Language Learning (SILL) by Oxford, R (1986), The Semi-structured Interview for self-taught non-native English Speakers designed by the researcher himself based on the MAI. The analysis and triangulation of the data showed that all of the participants had high levels of metacognitive awareness (LOMA), which means that they all were adept at deeply knowing themselves as learners metacognitively speaking. Besides, it was also found that among the different language learning strategies proposed by Oxford, Metacognitive Strategies were the most preferred ones by the participants. Furthermore, it was found that Metacognition and Learner Autonomy were mainly present in terms of a strong sense of commitment and responsibility for the learning process by making the participants taking control of their language learning process as knowers and regulators of it. On the other hand, it was found that regulation of the learning process in aspects of planning and evaluation was the most challenging aspect of the learning experience for most of the participants.spa
dc.description.degreelevelMaestríaspa
dc.description.degreenameMagister en Enseñanza de Lenguas Extranjerasspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad Pedagógica Nacionalspa
dc.identifier.reponamereponame: Repositorio Institucional UPNspa
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl: http://repositorio.pedagogica.edu.co/
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12209/19504
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.publisherUniversidad Pedagógica Nacionalspa
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Humanidadesspa
dc.publisher.programMaestría en Enseñanza de Lenguas Extranjeras con énfasis en Inglés/Francésspa
dc.relation.referencesAdelman, C. (1994). Lessons of a Generation: Education and Work in the Lives of the High School Class of 1972. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.spa
dc.relation.referencesAlghamdi, F. M. A. (2016). Self-directed learning in preparatory-year university students: Comparing successful and less-successful English language learners. English Language Teaching, 9(7), 59.spa
dc.relation.referencesAlvarez, C., Barón, C., and Martinez, M. (2017). Promoting the Use of Metacognitive and Vocabulary Learning Strategies in Eighth-Graders. Íkala, Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura.spa
dc.relation.referencesAnderson, J. R. (1985). Cognitive psychology and its implications. 2nd ed. New York: Freeman.spa
dc.relation.referencesAnderson, Neil J. (2002). The Role of Metacognition in Second Language Teaching and Learning. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics, ERIC Clearinghouse on Languages and Linguistics.spa
dc.relation.referencesBailey, K. D. (1994). Methods of Social Research (fourth edition). New York: The Free Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesBarbosa, S. (2012). Applying a Metacognitive Model of Strategic Learning Comprehension, by Means on Online-Based Activities, in a College Course. Department of Foreign Languages and Cultures. Universidad de La Sabana, Chía, Colombia.spa
dc.relation.referencesBarón, C. & Martínez, M. (2012). The world in our hands. [WebQuest]. Retrieved from: http://www.zunal.com/webquest.php?w=60584spa
dc.relation.referencesBell, J. (2014). Doing Your Research Project: A guide for first-time researchers. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).spa
dc.relation.referencesBenson, P. (2013). Teaching and researching: Autonomy in language learning. Routledge.spa
dc.relation.referencesBirmingham, P., & Wilkinson, D. (2003). Using research instruments: A guide for researchers. Routledge.spa
dc.relation.referencesBorg, S and Al-Busaidi, S. (2012). Teachers’ beliefs and practices regarding learner autonomy. ELT Journal Advance Access.spa
dc.relation.referencesBozorgian, H. (2012). Metacognitive instruction does improve listening comprehension. International Scholarly Research Network ISRN Education, 2012, 6 pages. https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/734085spa
dc.relation.referencesBraun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oaspa
dc.relation.referencesBrice, A.E., & Roseberry-McKibben, C. (1999). Turning frustration into success for English language learners. Educational Leadership, 56(7), 53-55.spa
dc.relation.referencesBrookfield, S. (1984). Self-directed adult learning: A critical paradigm. Adult Education Quarterly, 35, 59-71.spa
dc.relation.referencesBrookfield, S. (1985). Self-directed learning: A critical review of research. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education.spa
dc.relation.referencesBrookhart, S. & Moss, C. (2009). Advancing formative assessment in every classroom. A guide for instructional leaders. ASCD.spa
dc.relation.referencesBrown, A. L., and Palincsar, A. S. (1982). Inducing strategies learning from texts by means of informed, self-control training. Topics in Learning and Learning Disabilities 2 (1): 1 -17.spa
dc.relation.referencesBrown, A. L., Bransford, J. D., Ferrara, R. A., & Campione, J. C. (1983). Learning, remembering, and understanding. In J. H. Flavell & E. M. Markman (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (Vol. 1): Cognitive development (pp. 77-166). New York: Wiley.spa
dc.relation.referencesBrown, A. L. (1987). “Metacognition, Executive Control, Self-Regulation, and Other More Mysterious Mechanisms.” In Metacognition, Motivation, and Understanding, edited by Franz E. Weinert and Rainer H. Kluwe, 65–116. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.spa
dc.relation.referencesBrown, D. H. (2004). Language assessment: Principles and classroom practices. Longman.spa
dc.relation.referencesBrown, D. H. (2004). Language assessment: Principles and classroom practices. Longman.spa
dc.relation.referencesBurns, A. (2001). Collaborative action research for English language teachers. Cambridge University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesBurns, A. (2010). Doing action research in English language teaching: A guide for practitioners. New York, us: Routledge.Burns, A. (2010). Doing action research in English language teaching: A guide for practitioners. New York, us: Routledge.spa
dc.relation.referencesCárdenas, A. M. (2018). Tackling intermediate students’ fossilized grammatical errors in speech through self-evaluation and self-monitoring strategies. Profile: Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 20(2), 195-209. https://doi.org/10.15446/profile.v20n2.67996.spa
dc.relation.referencesChamot, A.U., Barnhardt, S., El Dinary, P., Carbonaro, G. & Robbins, J., (1993). Methods for teaching Learning strategies in the foreign language classroom and Assessment of Language skills 16 for instruction. Final report. Georgetown University. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED365157.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesChamot, A.U et al. (1995). Learning Strategies in Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesChamot, A. (2001). The role of learning strategies in second language acquisition. En M. Breen (Ed.), Learner contributions to language learning. New directions in research (pp. 25-43). Harlow: Longmaspa
dc.relation.referencesChamot, A. U. (2005). “Language Learning Strategy Instruction: Current Issues and Research.” Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 25: 112–30. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190505000061 Chamot, A. U. (2009). The CALLA handbook: Implementing the cognitive academic language learning approach (2nd ed.). White Plains, US: Pearson-Longman.spa
dc.relation.referencesChang J. (2006). Globalization and English in Chinese higher education. World English es, 25(3/4), 513-525spa
dc.relation.referencesCohen, A. D. (1996). Second language learning and use strategies: clarifying the issues. Center for Advanced Research on Language Acquisition University of Minnesota, Minneapolis. Revised version.spa
dc.relation.referencesCohen, L., Manion, L. and Morrison, K. R. B. (2004). A Guide to Teaching Practice (fifth edition). London: Routledge.spa
dc.relation.referencesCook, L. K., & Mayer, R. E. (1983). Reading strategies training for meaningful learning from prose. In M. Pressley, & J. Levin (Eds.), Cognitive Strategy Research (pp. 14-27). New York, NY: Springer Verlag.spa
dc.relation.referencesColombia, Ministerio de Educación Nacional (MEN). (2001). Programa Nacional de Bilingüismo. Corbin., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13(1),3-21.spa
dc.relation.referencesCotterall, S. (2000). Promoting Learner Autonomy through the Curriculum: Principles for Designing Language Courses. ELT Journal, 54, 109-117. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/elt/54.2.109spa
dc.relation.referencesCotterall, S. (2008). Autonomy and Good Language Learners. In Griffiths, C. (ed.), Lessons from Good Language Learners, pp. 83-98. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesCouncil of Europe. (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Cambridge University Pressspa
dc.relation.referencesCreswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.spa
dc.relation.referencesCreswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage Publications, Inc.spa
dc.relation.referencesCrotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. London: Sage.spa
dc.relation.referencesCuesta, C., Lucero, M., and Herrera, L., (2022). The Influence of Self-Assessment on the English Language Learning Process of Students from a Public University in Colombia. Colombian Applied Linguists Journal.spa
dc.relation.referencesDam, L. (1990) Developing awareness of learning in an autonomous language learning context. In Duda and Riley (eds) (pp. 189-197).spa
dc.relation.referencesDam, L. (1995). Learner autonomy 3: From theory to classroom practice. Dublin: Authentik.spa
dc.relation.referencesDang, T. 2012. Learner autonomy: A synthesis of theory and practice. Internet Journal of Language, Culture and Society.spa
dc.relation.referencesDenzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.spa
dc.relation.referencesDickinson, L. (1992) Learner Autonomy 2: Learner Training for Language Learning. Dublin: Authentik.spa
dc.relation.referencesDörnyei, Z., & Skehan, P. (2003). Individual differences in second language learning. The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, 589–630.spa
dc.relation.referencesDörnyei, Z., & Skehan, P. (2003). Individual differences in second language learning. The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, 589–630.spa
dc.relation.referencesDuff, P.A. (2017) Language Socialization, Higher Education, and Work. Language Socialization. Encyclopedia of Language and Education (3rd ed.). Springer, Cham. (Pp. 255–272) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02255-0_19spa
dc.relation.referencesEfklides, Anastasia. (2009). “The Role of Metacognitive Experiences in the Learning Process.” Psicothema 21 (1): 76–82.spa
dc.relation.referencesEhrman, M. E., Leaver, B. Lou, & Oxford, R. L. (2003). A brief overview of individual differences in second language learning. System, 31(3), 313–330.spa
dc.relation.referencesEllis, R. (1993). Talking shop: Second language acquisition research: How does it help teachers? An interview with Rod Ellis. ELT Journal, 47(1), 3–11.spa
dc.relation.referencesEllis, R. (2002). Does form-focused instruction affect the acquisition of implicit knowledge? A review of the research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24(2), 223-236. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263102002073.spa
dc.relation.referencesFang H., Wan C., Jin J., Meng L. (2022). Prior autonomy frustration facilitates persistent behavior: the moderating role of autonomy causality orientation. Motiv. Emot. 46, 573–587. 10.1007/s11031- 022-09961-2 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]spa
dc.relation.referencesFisher, Linda. (2018). “‘Emotion Recollected in Tranquility’: Writing for Metacognition in Language Teacher Education.” In Metacognition in Language Learning and Teaching, edited by Åsta Haukås, Camilla Bjørke, and Magne Dypedahl. New York: Routledge.spa
dc.relation.referencesFlavell, J. H. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), The nature of intelligence (pp. 231–235). Hillsdale, NJ7 Erlbaum.spa
dc.relation.referencesFlavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906spa
dc.relation.referencesFlavell, J. H. (1987). “Speculations about the Nature and Development of Metacognition.” In Metacognition, Motivation, and Understanding, edited by Weinert, Franz Emanuel, and Rainer H. Kluwe, 21–9. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.spa
dc.relation.referencesFlavell, J. H. (1992). Perspectives on perspective taking. In H. Beilin, & P. Pufall (Eds.), Piaget’s theory: Prospects and possibilities (pp. 107–141). Hillsdale, NJ7 Erlbaum.spa
dc.relation.referencesGan, Z., Humphreys, G., & Hamp-Lyons, L. (2004). Understanding successful and unsuccessful EFL students in Chinese universities. The Modern Language Journal, 88(2), 229–244.spa
dc.relation.referencesGardner, H. (1981). The Quest for mind. University of Chicago Print.spa
dc.relation.referencesGay, L. and Airasian, P. (2000) Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Experience. 6th Edition, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River.spa
dc.relation.referencesGeerrz, C. (1973). Deep play: Notes on the Balinese cockfight. In C. Geertz (Ed.), The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays (pp. 412-435). New York: Basic Books.spa
dc.relation.referencesGeorghiades, P. (2004). From the general to the situated: three decades of metacognition. International Journal of Science Education volume 26, Issue 3.spa
dc.relation.referencesGoundar, S. (2012). Research methodology and research method. In S. Goundar (Ed.), Cloud Computing.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/333015026_Chapter_3_- _Research_Methodology_and_Research_Method.spa
dc.relation.referencesGreaney, A.-M., Sheehy, A., Heffernan, C., Murphy, J., Mhaolrúnaigh, S. N., Heffernan, E., & Brown, G. (2012). Research ethics application: A guide for the novice researcher. British Journal of Nursing, 21(1), 38-43.spa
dc.relation.referencesGriffiths, C. (2008). Strategies and good language learners. In Griffiths, C. (ed.), Lessons from Good Language Learners (pp. 83-98). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesGriffiths, C. (2015b). What have we learnt from ‘good language’ learners? ELT Journal, 69(4), 425-433. https://doi.org/10.1093/ elt/ccv040.spa
dc.relation.referencesHamel, J. (1993) Case Study Methods. Sage, Newbury Park. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412983587spa
dc.relation.referencesHamied, F. A. (2017). Research Methods: A Guide for First-Time Researchers. UPI Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesHan, Z., & Odlin, T. (Eds.). (2006). Studies of fossilization in second language acquisition. Clevedon, uk: Multilingual Matters.spa
dc.relation.referencesHancock, B. (2002). An Introduction to Qualitative Research. Nottingham, UK: Trent Focus Group.spa
dc.relation.referencesHaukås, Åsta. (2018). “Metacognition in Language Learning and Teaching: An Overview.” In Metacognition in Language Learning and Teaching, edited by Åsta Haukås, Camilla Bjørke, and Magne Dypedahl. New York: Routledge.spa
dc.relation.referencesHarris, V. (2003). Adapting classroom-based strategy instruction to a distance learning context. TESLElectronic Journal, 7(2), 1-19.spa
dc.relation.referencesHarris, Karen R., Steven Graham, Mary Brindle, and Karin Sandmel. (2009). “Metacognition and Children’s Writing.” In Handbook of Metacognition in Education, edited by Douglas J. Hacker, John Dunlosky, and Arthur C. Graesser, 131–53. NewYork: Routledge.spa
dc.relation.referencesHiver, Philip, and George Whitehead. (2018). “Teaching Metacognitively: Adaptive Inside-Out Thinking in the L2 Classroom.” In Metacognition in Language Learning and Teaching, edited.spa
dc.relation.referencesHolec, H. (1979). Autonomy and foreign language learning. ERIC.spa
dc.relation.referencesHolec, H. (1981). Learner autonomy and language learning. Council of Europe, 1981, 66-74.spa
dc.relation.referencesHoy, W. and Adams, C. 2015. Quantitative Research in Education a Primer Second Edition. Sage.spa
dc.relation.referencesHuang, J. (2005). Analysis of Language Features of Xixiangji. The Frontier of Literature, 1, 330- 339.spa
dc.relation.referencesJanicki, Carol. (2006). Language Misconceived: Arguing for Applied Cognitive Sociolinguistics. London: Routledge.spa
dc.relation.referencesJanicki, Carol. (2006). Language Misconceived: Arguing for Applied Cognitive Sociolinguistics. London: Routledge.spa
dc.relation.referencesKarin, L. (2019). Self-Taught: A case Study of successful self-directed strategies, practices, and affordances used by Newcomers engaged in English as an additional language learning in the workplace. B.A. Anthropology, The University of British Columbia.spa
dc.relation.referencesKayaoglu, M. N. (2013). Poor and Good Learners’ Language Beliefs and Their Influence on Their Language Learning Strategy Use. Novitas-ROYAL (Research on Youth and Language), 7(1), 36- 54.spa
dc.relation.referencesKramp, M. K., & Lee Humphreys, W. (1993). Narrative, self-assessment, and the reflective learner. College Teaching, 41(3), 83-88. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.1993.9926784spa
dc.relation.referencesKrashen, S. D. (1982). Acquiring a Second Language. World Englishes, 1(3), 97–101. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971X.1982.tb00476.xspa
dc.relation.referencesKrashen, S. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. New York: Longman.spa
dc.relation.referencesKvale, S. (1996). Interviews: An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.spa
dc.relation.referencesKuhn, Deanna. (2000). “Metacognitive Development.” Current Directions in Psychological Science 9 (5): 178–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00088spa
dc.relation.referencesLaing, R. D. (1967) The Politics of Experience and the Bird of Paradise. Harmondsworth: Penguin.spa
dc.relation.referencesLantolf, J., Ed. (2000). Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning. Oxford UK: Oxford University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesLe Ho, G. A. (2011). Understanding good language learners of Vietnamese as a foreign language. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 8(2), 385-398.spa
dc.relation.referencesL, Cohen., L, Manion., K. Morrison. (2007). Research Methods in Education 6th edition. Routledge.spa
dc.relation.referencesLightbown & Spada, (2018). How Languages are Learned. Oxford, UK: Oxford Pressspa
dc.relation.referencesLittle, D. (1991). Learner Autonomy 1: Definitions, Issues and Problems. Dublin, Ireland: Authentik.spa
dc.relation.referencesLittle, D. (1995). Learning as dialogue: The dependence of learner autonomy on teacher autonomy. System, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 175-181, 1995 Elsevier Science Ltd rergamon Pnn~d in Great Britain.spa
dc.relation.referencesLittle, D. (1999). Developing Learner Autonomy in the foreign language classroom: a social interactive view of learning and three fundamental pedagogical principles. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses, No. 38, 1999, págs. 77-88.spa
dc.relation.referencesLittle, D. (2004). Democracy, discourse and learner autonomy in the foreign language classroom. Utbildning & Demokrati 2004, Vol 13, PP. 105–126.spa
dc.relation.referencesLittle, D., & Thorne, S. L. (2017). From Learner Autonomy to Rewilding: A Discussion. In M. Cappellini, T. Lewis, and A. R. Mompean (Eds.), Learner Autonomy and Web 2.0 (pp. 12-35). Sheffield, UK: Equinox.spa
dc.relation.referencesLittle, D., Dam, L., & Legenhausen, L. (2017). Language learner autonomy: what, why and how. Second Language Acquisition.spa
dc.relation.referencesLittlewood, W. 1996. “Autonomy”: An anatomy and a framework. System Volume 24, Issue 4, December 1996, Pages 427-435.spa
dc.relation.referencesLittlewood, W. (1999). Defining and Developing Autonomy in East Asian Contexts. Applied Linguistics, 20, 71-94.spa
dc.relation.referencesLincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (2000). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 1065-1122), Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.spa
dc.relation.referencesLivingston, J. A. (2003). Metacognition: An Overview. Psychology, 13, 259-266.spa
dc.relation.referencesLong, M. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. Ritchie and T. Bhatia (Eds). Handbook of Second Language Acquisition (413-468). New York, NY: Academic Pressspa
dc.relation.referencesLong, M. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. Ritchie and T. Bhatia (Eds). Handbook of Second Language Acquisition (413-468). New York, NY: Academic Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesMariani, L. (1997). Teacher Support and Teacher Challenge in Promoting Learner Autonomy. Perspectives, a Journal of TESOL-Italy, Vol. 22.spa
dc.relation.referencesMat Roni, S., Merga, M. K., & Morris, J. E. (2020). Conducting quantitative research in education. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9132-3spa
dc.relation.referencesMcCormick, Christine B. (2003). “Metacognition and Learning.” In Handbook of Psychology, Vol. 7, Educational Psychology, edited by William. https://doi.org/10.17151/rlee.2021.17.1.7spa
dc.relation.referencesMetcalfe, Janet. (2008). “Evolution of Metacognition.” In Handbook of Metamemory and Memory, edited by John Dunlosky and Robert Bjork, 29–46. New York: Psychology Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesMetcalfe, J., & Shimamura, A. P. (1994). Metacognition: Knowing about Knowing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesMills, G.E., & Gay, L.R. (2016). Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Applications, 11th ed. Boston, MA: Pearson.spa
dc.relation.referencesMontague, M. (1992). The effects of cognitive and metacognitive strategy instruction on the mathematical problem solving of middle school students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, Volume 25, Issue 4.spa
dc.relation.referencesMoss, C. & Brookhart, S. (2009). Advancing formative assessment in every classroom. A guide for instructional leaders. ASCD.spa
dc.relation.referencesMoseley et al S, (2005). Thinking skills frameworks for use in education and training. British Educational Research Journal, Volume31, Issue 3.spa
dc.relation.referencesNeuman, W. L. (2000). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.spa
dc.relation.referencesNisbet, J. D., & Watt, J. (1978). Case study, rediguide No. 26. Nottingham: Nottingham University.spa
dc.relation.referencesNisbet, J., & Shucksmith, J. (1986). Learning Strategies. London: Routledge Education Books.spa
dc.relation.referencesNisbet, J., & Shucksmith, J. (1986). Learning Strategies. London: Routledge Education Books.spa
dc.relation.referencesNunan, D. (1992). Research Methods in Language Learning. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesNunan, D. (1996). Towards autonomous learning: Some theoretical, empirical and practical issues. In R. Pemberton, E. S. L. Li, W. W. F. Or & H. D. Pierson (Eds.), Taking control: Autonomy in language learning (pp. 13-26). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesNunan, D. (1997). Designing and adapting materials to encourage learner autonomy. In P. Benson & P. Voller (Eds.), Autonomy and independence in language learning (pp. 192-203). London: Longman.spa
dc.relation.referencesNunan, D. (1999). Second language teaching and learning. Boston: Heinle &Heinle.spa
dc.relation.referencesNunan, D. (2000). Autonomy in language learning. Paper presented at the ASOCOPI 2000 Conference, Cartagena, Colombia.spa
dc.relation.referencesNunan, D. (2004). Task-based language teaching. Cambridge, uk: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667336.spa
dc.relation.referencesO'Malley, J., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesO’Malley, J. M., & Valdez-Pierce, L. V. (1996). Oral language assessment. In Authentic assessment for English language learners. Addison Wesley.spa
dc.relation.referencesOxford, R. (1986). Second Language Learning Strategies: Current Research and Implications for Practice. California Univ., Los Angeles. Center for Language Education and Research.spa
dc.relation.referencesOxford, R., & Nyikos, M. (1989). Variables affecting choice of language learning strategies by university students. The modern language journal, 73(3), 291-300.spa
dc.relation.referencesOxford, R. L. (2003). Language Learning Styles and Strategies: An Overview.spa
dc.relation.referencesPapaleontiou-Louca, E. (2008). Metacognition and Theory of Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.spa
dc.relation.referencesPennycook, A. (1997) Vulgar Pragmatism, Critical Pragmatism, and EAP. English for Specific Purposes, 16, 253-269.spa
dc.relation.referencesPhillipson, R. (1992) Linguistic Imperialism. Oxford University Press, Oxford.spa
dc.relation.referencesPrissananuntakul, N. (2017). The Survey of Language Learning Strategies of high scoring and low scoring students of an international program in a university. Master of Arts in careers English for international Communication Language Institute Thammasat University.spa
dc.relation.referencesPica, T. (1994). Research on negotiation: What does it reveal about second-language learning conditions, processes, and outcomes? Language Learning, 44(3), 493–527. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1994.tb01115.xspa
dc.relation.referencesPintrich, Paul R. (2002). “The Role of Metacognitive Knowledge in Learning, Teaching and Assessing.” Theory Into Practice 41 (4): 219–25. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4104_3spa
dc.relation.referencesRahman, A., Angraeni,A,. Fauzi, R. (2021). The Activation of Learners’ Metacognition to Promote Learning Autonomy of Good Language Learners. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, Vol. 11, No. 4, 2021 (pp. 249-253)spa
dc.relation.referencesRátiva, M., Pedreros, A., & Nuñez, M. (2012). Using Webbased activities to promote reading: An exploratory study with teenagers. PROFILE: Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 14(2), 11-27. Retrieved from http://www.revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/profile/article/view/34034spa
dc.relation.referencesCRaya et al. (2007). Pedagogy for autonomy in language education in Europe: Towards a framework for learner and teacher development. Research Gate: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259850477_Pedagogy_for_autonomy_in_language_edu cation_in_Europe_Towards_a_framework_for_learner_and_teacher_developmentspa
dc.relation.referencesRobson, C. (2002) Real World Research (second edition). Oxford: Blackwell.spa
dc.relation.referencesRodríguez-Ochoa, E. O. (2007). Self-assessment practices: An empowering tool in the teaching and learning EFL processes. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 9, 229-246. https://doi.org/10.14483/22487085.3153spa
dc.relation.referencesRubin, J. (1975). What the Good language learner can teach us. Tesol Quarterly, 9(1), 41–51.spa
dc.relation.referencesScharle, A. & Szabó, A. (2000). Learner Autonomy: A Guide to Developing Learner Responsibilityspa
dc.relation.referencesSchmitt, N. (1997). Vocabulary learning strategies. In N. Schmitt & M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description, acquisition and pedagogy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesSchraeder, L. L. (1996). Empowering esl students in the mainstream through self-assessment and contracted learning. Retrieved from eric database. (ed407850)spa
dc.relation.referencesSchwandt, T. A. (2001). Dictionary of qualitative inquiry (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.spa
dc.relation.referencesSchraw, G. (1989). Promoting general metacognitive awareness. Instructional Science, 26(1-2), 113-125.spa
dc.relation.referencesSchraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing Metacognitive Awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19, 460-475. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1994.1033spa
dc.relation.referencesCSchraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing Metacognitive Awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19, 460-475. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1994.1033spa
dc.relation.referencesSchraw, Gregory. (1998). “Promoting General Metacognitive Awareness.” Instructional Science 26 (12): 113–25. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003044231033spa
dc.relation.referencesSchraw, G., Crippen, K. J., & Hartley, K. (2006). Promoting Self-Regulation in Science Education: Metacognition as Part of a Broader Perspective on Learning. Research in Science Education, 36, 111-139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-005-3917-8spa
dc.relation.referencesSchwartz, S. H. (1977). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development.spa
dc.relation.referencesSelinker, L. (1972). Interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 10(3), 209-231.https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.1972.10.1-4.209.spa
dc.relation.referencesSilverman, D. (2013). Doing qualitative research: A practical handbook. Sage.spa
dc.relation.referencesSpada, N. (1997). Form-focused instruction and second language acquisition: A review of classroom and laboratory research. Language Teaching, 30(2), 73-87. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444800012799.spa
dc.relation.referencesStake, R. (1995). The art of casestudy research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.spa
dc.relation.referencesSternberg, R. (2012). Intelligence. Wires Cognitive Science.spa
dc.relation.referencesSwain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Glass and C. Madden (Eds), Input in Second Language Acquisition. (235–253), Rowley, MA: Newbury House.spa
dc.relation.referencesSwartz, R. (2003). Infusing critical and creative thinking into instruction in high school classrooms. In D. Fasko (Ed.), Critical thinking and reasoning (pp. 293-310). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesTarricone, P. (2011). The Taxonomy of Metacognition. New York: Taylor & Francis Group.spa
dc.relation.referencesTaylor, S. J., & Bogdan, R. (1998). Introduction to qualitative research methods: A guidebook and resource (3rd ed.). New York: John WHey.spa
dc.relation.referencesThomas, M and Janosy, R (2020) Self-Taught Language Learners in China and Their Learning Strategies: A Multiple, Instrumental Case Study of Approaches in Contextual Situations. Asian EFL Journal, 24 (2). pp. 136-161. ISSN 1738-1460spa
dc.relation.referencesTsui, A. B. M., & Tollefson, J. W. (2007). Language policy and the construction of national cultural identity. In A. B. M. Tsui & J. W. Tollefson (Eds.), Language policy, culture, and identity in Asian contexts (pp. 1-21). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.spa
dc.relation.referencesTudor, I. (2001). The Dynamics of the Language Classroom. New York: Cambridge University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesUsuki, M. (1999). Learner Autonomy in Language Learning: A Preliminary Investigation. Semantic Scholar.spa
dc.relation.referencesVeenman, M. (1997). The relation between intellectual and metacognitive skills from a developmental perspective. New York: Routledge.spa
dc.relation.referencesVeenman, M., & Elshout, J. J. (1999). Changes in the relation between cognitive and metacognitive skills during the acquisition of expertise. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 14(4), 509–523. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03172976spa
dc.relation.referencesVeenman, Marcel & Wilhelm, P. & Beishuizen, Jos. (2004). The relation between intellectual and metacognitive skills from a developmental perspective. Learning and Instruction. 14. 89-109. 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2003.10.004.spa
dc.relation.referencesVeenman, Marcel V. J., Bernadette van Hout-Wolters, and Peter Afflerbach. (2006.) “Metacognition and Learning: Conceptual and Methodological Considerations.” Metacognition and Learning 1: 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-006-6893-0spa
dc.relation.referencesVeenman, Marcel V. J. (2016). “Learning to Self-Monitor and Self-Regulate.” In Handbook of Research on Learning and Instruction. 2nd ed., edited by Richard E. Mayer and Patricia A. Alexander, 197–218. New York: Routledge.spa
dc.relation.referencesVelásquez Jaramillo, M. (2020). Developing Aural and Oral Skills of Beginner Learners of English as a Foreign Language Through Explicit Metacognitive Strategies Training. Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios Educativos, 17(1), 120-141.spa
dc.relation.referencesVictori, M., & Lockhart, W. (1995). Enhancing metacognition in self-directed language learning. System, 23(2), 223-234. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0346-251X(95)00010-Hspa
dc.relation.referencesVogt, B. (2005) Pain and Emotion Interactions in the Subregions of the Cingulate Gyrus. Nature Review Neuroscience, 6, 533-544. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrn1704spa
dc.relation.referencesVygotsky, L. (1978) Interaction between learning and development. In Vygotsky, L, Mind in Society, pp. 79-91. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesWeinstein, C. and Mayer, R. (1986) The Teaching of Learning Strategies. In: Wittrock, M., Ed., Handbook of Research on Teaching, Macmillan, New York, 315-327.spa
dc.relation.referencesWenden, A. and Rubin, J. (1987) Learner Strategies in Language Learning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall International.spa
dc.relation.referencesWenden, A. (1991). Learner strategies for learner autonomy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.spa
dc.relation.referencesWenden, A.L. (1998) Metacognitive Knowledge and Language Learning, Applied Linguistics, 19, pp. 515-537.spa
dc.relation.referencesWenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge UK: Cambridge Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesWilson, N. and McLean, S. (1994) Questionnaire Design: A Practical Introduction. Newtown Abbey, Co. Antrim: University of Ulster Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesYin, K.-R. (1993) Application of Case Study Research. Sage Publication, California, 33-35.spa
dc.relation.referencesYin, R.K. (2000). Case Study Research Design and Methods Third Edition. Applied Social Research Methods Series Volume 5.spa
dc.relation.referencesYin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and method (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.spa
dc.relation.referencesZimmerman, Barry J., and Albert Bandura. (1994). “Impact of Self-Regulatory Influences on Writing Course Attainment.” American Educational Research Journal 31 (4): 845–62. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312031004845spa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.creativecommonsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectMetacogniciónspa
dc.subjectConciencia metacognitivaspa
dc.subjectEstrategias metacognitivasspa
dc.subjectAutonomía del alumnospa
dc.subject.keywordsMetacognitioneng
dc.subject.keywordsMetacognitive knowledgeeng
dc.subject.keywordsMetacognitive strategieseng
dc.subject.keywordsLearner autonomyeng
dc.titleMetacognition and learner autonomy : a case study on the learning experiences of self-taught bilingual CSRs at a call center.spa
dc.title.translatedMetacognition and Learner Autonomy: a case study on the learning experiences of self-taught bilingual CSRs at a call center.spa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdcceng
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesiseng
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.type.localTesis/Trabajo de grado - Monografía - Maestríaspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.type.versionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
Metacognition and Learner Autonomy.pdf
Tamaño:
2.56 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 2 de 2
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
1.71 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción:
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
202403250029553-07 MAR 24 ANDRES DIAZ.pdf
Tamaño:
165.26 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Licencia aprobada