Co-construction of self and peer assessment in class and on online learning communities.

dc.contributor.advisorVera Rodríguez, Esperanzaspa
dc.contributor.authorCruz Suárez, Edgar Fabianspa
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-03T21:15:47Z
dc.date.available2019-09-03T21:15:47Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.description.abstractTesis de grado de maestría en la que el autor presenta los resultados de un estudio de caso cualitativo desarrollado con once estudiantes de un nivel intermedio-alto (Challenge 1-3) del Centro Colombo Americano, Bogotá, Colombia. Esta investigación tuvo como objetivo describir, analizar y documentar los conceptos de auto y co-evaluación construidos por los estudiantes mediante su participación en tareas de evaluación en clase y en una comunidad de aprendizaje virtual. Los datos se recogieron a lo largo de aproximadamente 57 sesiones de clases dadas en un espacio de tres meses, y los instrumentos que se emplearon cuestionarios, grabaciones de voz por parte de los estudiantes y grupos focales de discusión.spa
dc.description.degreelevelMaestríaspa
dc.description.degreenameMagister en Enseñanza de Lenguas Extranjerasspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad Pedagógica Nacionalspa
dc.identifier.otherTO-21978
dc.identifier.reponamereponame: Repositorio Institucional UPNspa
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl: http://repositorio.pedagogica.edu.co/
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12209/10189
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisherUniversidad Pedagógica Nacionalspa
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Humanidadesspa
dc.publisher.programMaestría en Enseñanza de Lenguas Extranjeras con énfasis en Inglés/Francésspa
dc.relation.referencesBender, T. (2003). Discussion-Based Online Teaching to Enhance Student Learning. Theory, Practice and Assessment. Stylus Publishing.
dc.relation.referencesBoud, DJ, (1980). Self and peer assessment in professional education: A preliminary study in law. Journal of the Society of Public Teachers of Law
dc.relation.referencesBrown, Douglas. (2004). Language Assessment: Principles and Classroom practices. New York. Longman
dc.relation.referencesCasanova, Maria. (1995). Manual de Evaluación Educativa. La Muralla. México
dc.relation.referencesChao, C. (2007). Theory and Research: New Emphases of Assessment. In Call Environments. TESOL. New York
dc.relation.referencesCollins, Allan. Halverson, Richard (2009). Rethinking Education in the Age of Technology. Teachers College Press
dc.relation.referencesDornyei. (2003). Questionnaires in Second Language Research: Construction, administration. New York. Erlbaum.
dc.relation.referencesCohen, Andrew (1994). Assessing Language Ability in the Classroom. Heinle and Heinle Publishers
dc.relation.referencesEliot & Associates (2007) Guidelines for Conducting a Focus Group [online] available from [22 April 2011]
dc.relation.referencesFraenkel, J. (2006). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. New York: Mc Graw Hill.
dc.relation.referencesFreeman, D. (1998). Doing teacher research: From inquiry to understanding. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
dc.relation.referencesFreeman, M. (1995) Peer assessment by groups of group work. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 20, 289-299
dc.relation.referencesFoody, W. (1993) Constructing Questions for Interviews and Questionnaires. Australia, Cambridge University Press
dc.relation.referencesGillham, B. (2000). Developing a Questionnaire. London. Continuum.
dc.relation.referencesGlaser, B and others. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine Transaction A Division of Transaction Publishers New Brunswick (U.S.A.)
dc.relation.referencesHURTADO, L. (2012) Facilitating alternative assessment training and enhancing student-teacher Communication through the use of on-line communities. Thesis
dc.relation.referencesIzaskun, J. J. (2010). Online self-assessment with feedback and metacognitive. High Educ, 243-248.
dc.relation.referencesLopez, A. B. (2009). Language Testing in Colombia: A Call for More Teacher Education and Teacher Training in Language Assessment. Profile, 55-69. Vol 11-2
dc.relation.referencesMack, N. and others (2005) Qualitative Research Methods: A Data Collector’s Field Guide. North Carolina Family Health International
dc.relation.referencesMcNamara, T.F. (2006) The Social Dimension of Testing. Blackwell Publishing. Madden. USA
dc.relation.referencesMarzano, R. (2010). Formative Assessment and Standards-based grading. In R. Marzano, Formative Assessment and Standards-based grading. (p. 13). Marzano Research Laboratory.
dc.relation.referencesMaxwell, J.A. (1992) Harvard Educational Review. (p 279-300). Harvard Education Publishing Group.
dc.relation.referencesMedina, R.A. (2009) Interaction in Online Tutoring Sessions: An Opportunity to Knit English Language Learning in a Blended Program. Bogotá. http://www.scielo.org.co
dc.relation.referencesO’malley, J.M., & Valdez Pierce, L. (1996). Authentic assessment for English language learners: Practical approaches for teachers. New York: Addison-Wesley.
dc.relation.referencesOmelicheva ,MariaY. (2005) Self and Peer Evaluation in Undergraduate Education: Structuring Conditions That Maximize Its Promises and Minimize the Perils[J]. Journal of Political Science Education. 2005(1): 191-205.
dc.relation.referencesOppenheim,. N. (1992). Questionnaire design, interviewing and attitude measurement (New Edition). London, Pinter.
dc.relation.referencesPaiz, Joshua, Angeli, Elizabeth E., Wagner, J., Lawrick, E., Moore, K., Anderson, M., Soderlund, Keck, Russell., & Brizee, A. (2016, May 13). General format. Retrieved from http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/01/
dc.relation.referencesPallof, R.M. Pratt, K (2008). Assessing the Online Learner: Resources and Strategies for Faculty. San Francisco. Joey-Bass (in Publication)
dc.relation.referencesRace, P. (1998) Practical Pointers in Peer Assessment, 113-122 in Peer Assessment in Practice, Brown, S. (ed.) (SEDA paper102) Birmingham: SEDA
dc.relation.referencesRapley, T. (2007) Doing Conversation, Discourse and Document Analysis. London. Sage Publications.
dc.relation.referencesRenniger, A., Shummar, W. (2002) Building Virtual Communities. Learning and Change in Cyberspace. Cambridge University Press. United Kingdom.
dc.relation.referencesScriven, M. (1991) Evaluation Thesaurus. Sage. California. USA
dc.relation.referencesSwanson, D., Case, S. & van der Vlueten, C. (1991) Strategies for student assessment. In: The Challenge of Problem Based Learning. Eds. D. Boud & G. Feletti. Pp 260-273. Kogan Page, London. Cambridge,Massachusetts & London: Harvard University Press,1978:126-130.
dc.relation.referencesTaylor, Josephine. (2009) Curricular Framework for Evaluation. Adult English Program. Centro Colombo Americano
dc.relation.referencesVillamil, O., DeGuerrero, M. Peer revision in the second language classroom: Social cognitive activities, mediating strategies and aspects of social behavior [J]. Journal of Second Language Writing, 1996,3 (1): 51-75.
dc.relation.referencesVygotsky, L.S. (1978) Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes.
dc.relation.referencesYazan, B. (2015). Three Approach es to Case Study Methods in Education: Yin, Merriam, and Stake. The Qualitative Report, 20(2), 134-152. Retrieved from http://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol20/iss2/12
dc.relation.referencesZariski, A. 1996 Student peer assessment in tertiary education: Promise, perils and practice. In Abbott, J. and Willcoxson, L. (Eds), Teaching and Learning Within and Across Disciplines, p189-200. Proceedings of the 5th Annual Teaching and Learning Forum, Murdoch University, February 1996. Perth: Murdoch University.
dc.relation.referencesZea, C. A. (2007). Hacia una Comunidad Educativa Interactiva. Medellin: Fondo Editorial Universidad Eafit.
dc.relation.referencesPaiz, Joshua, Angeli, Elizabeth E., Wagner, J., Lawrick, E., Moore, K., Anderson, M., Soderlund, Keck, Russell., & Brizee, A. (2016, May 13). General format. Retrieved from http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/01/
dc.rights.accessAcceso abiertospa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.creativecommonsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectInglés - Enseñanzaspa
dc.subjectAutoevaluaciónspa
dc.subjectEstudio de caso - Metodologíaspa
dc.subjectCoevaluaciónspa
dc.subjectRetroalimentaciónspa
dc.subjectEvaluación - Aulaspa
dc.subjectAprendizaje en linea - Comunidadspa
dc.titleCo-construction of self and peer assessment in class and on online learning communities.spa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdcceng
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesiseng
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.type.localTesis/Trabajo de grado - Monografía - Maestríaspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.type.versionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
TO-21978.pdf
Tamaño:
1.19 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 2 de 2
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
1.71 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción:
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
TO-21978.pdf
Tamaño:
1.26 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Licencia aprobada