Peer edition as a means for fostering EFL short story writing in a local private school an action research.

dc.contributor.advisorVelandia, Jairospa
dc.contributor.authorMora Torres, Diego Albertospa
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-23T22:41:35Z
dc.date.available2020-06-23T22:41:35Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractEste estudio de investigación-acción llevado a cabo con estudiantes de inglés de grado noveno en un colegio privado mixto ubicado en la ciudad de Bogotá, Colombia tuvo como objetivo entender el rol de la edición por pares En la construcción de historias cortas como tareas escritas en inglés. La importancia de esta propuesta radica en el fomentar que los estudiantes tomen control de sus procesos de alfabetización en inglés como lengua extranjera a través de la edición de sus propios productos escritos a través de la edición por pares. Los instrumentos de recolección de datos que se utilizaron para este propósito fueron artefactos, grabaciones de audio, notas de campo y un cuestionario de pregunta abierta. Los datos fueron recogidos durante diez clases del segundo semestre del año escolar a través de una intervención pedagógica siguiendo el modelo institucional del colegio: inducción, aprendizaje individual, aprendizaje grupal y evaluación. Los hallazgos revelaron que, a pesar de no haber mostrado un progreso sustancial en sus procesos de escritura en inglés, los participantes desarrollaron sus propias estrategias para llevar a cabo la práctica de edición por pares. En estas prácticas, también se evidenció una co-construcción de conocimiento en la cual los participantes se sintieron cómodos en clases que no fueron centradas en el profesor. Por lo tanto, la cooperación y la construcción de conocimiento entre los participantes revelaron relaciones de poder de experticia.spa
dc.description.abstractenglishThis action research study conducted with EFL ninth grade students at a coeducational private school located in the city of Bogotá, Colombia, aimed to understand the role of peer edition within EFL short story writing tasks construction. The importance of this proposal radiates in the encouragement on students to take control of their EFL literacy processes by editing their own written products through peer edition. The data collection instruments used for this purpose were artifacts, audio recordings, field notes and an open-ended questionnaire. The data was collected during 10 sessions along the second semester of the school year, through a pedagogical intervention following the school´s instructional model: induction, individual learning, group learning and evaluation. The findings exposed that, despite not showing a substantial progress in their EFL writing processes, the participants developed strategies to carry out the Peer Edition practices. In these practices, they also evidenced a co-construction of knowledge where they felt comfortable in a classroom which was not teacher-centered. Hence, cooperation and building of knowledge among partners revealed expert power relations.eng
dc.description.degreelevelMaestríaspa
dc.description.degreenameMagister en Enseñanza de Lenguas Extranjerasspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad Pedagógica Nacionalspa
dc.identifier.reponamereponame: Repositorio Institucional UPNspa
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl: http://repositorio.pedagogica.edu.co/
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12209/11960
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherUniversidad Pedagógica Nacionalspa
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Humanidadesspa
dc.publisher.programMaestría en Enseñanza de Lenguas Extranjeras con énfasis en Inglés/Francésspa
dc.relation.referencesAmineh, R.J and Asl, H.D. (2015). Review of Constructivism and Social Constructivism. Journal of Social Sciences, Literature and Languages. Vol. 1(1), pp. 9-16
dc.relation.referencesAndrews, R., Torgerson, C., Beverton, S., Freeman, A., Locke, T., Low, G., Robinson, A., and Zhu, D (2006), 'The Effect of Grammar Teaching on Writing Development', British Educational Research Journal, 32(1), p.39-55, JSTOR [Online], Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/30032657,(Accessed: 24 September 2016).
dc.relation.referencesBabu, Sooraj K., et al. (2017). Collaborative Game Based Learning of Post-Disaster Management: Serious Game on Incident Management Frameworks for Post Disaster Management. In: Technology for Education (T4E), 2016 IEEE Eighth International Conference on. IEEE.
dc.relation.referencesBriesmaster, M. and Etchegaray, P. (2017) Coherence and cohesion in EFL students' writing production: The impact of a metacognition-based intervention. Íkala, revista de lenguaje y cultura vol.22 no.2 Medellín May/Aug. 2017.
dc.relation.referencesBruner, J. (1990). Acts of Meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
dc.relation.referencesBurns, A. (2009). Action research in second language teacher education. ESL and applied linguistics professional series: Routledge
dc.relation.referencesCanale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical Bases of Communicative Approaches to Second Language Teaching and Testing. Applied Linguistics
dc.relation.referencesCastillo, R. (2014). Teaching and learning another language strategically. Colombia. Doctorado Interinstitucional en Educación & Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas
dc.relation.referencesChen, F. and Shang, H. (2009). Students’ perceptions of self-regulated strategy use on EFL writing performance. English Teaching & Culture, Vol. 5, 42-53
dc.relation.referencesCohen, L. Lawrence, M. and Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education: Routledge
dc.relation.referencesColegio Cafam. Proyecto educativo institucional.
dc.relation.referencesContreras, J., and Chapetón, C. (2017). Transforming EFL Classroom Practices and Promoting Students’ Empowerment: Collaborative Learning From a Dialogical Approach. Profile: Issues in Teachers´ Professional Development, 19(2), 135-149. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.15446/profile.v19n2.57811
dc.relation.referencesCouncil of Europe. (2001). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge, U.K: Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge.
dc.relation.referencesDe Guerero, & Villamil (1994). M.C.M. De Guerrero, O.S. Villamil Activating the ZPD: Mutual scaffolding in L2 peer revision. The Modern Language Journal, 84 (1) (2000)
dc.relation.referencesDenzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). The sage handbook of qualitative research. Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage
dc.relation.referencesDewey, J. (1938) Experience and Education. New York: Collier Books.
dc.relation.referencesDíaz, N. M. (2010). Peer-editing: A strategic source in EFL students’ writing process. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 12(1), 85–98. Retrieved from http://revistas.udistrital.edu.co/ojs/index.php/calj/article/view/93/142
dc.relation.referencesDíaz Ramírez, M. (2014). The impact of project work and the writing process method on writing production. HOW, A Colombian Journal for Teachers of English, 21(2), 31-53.
dc.relation.referencesDickinson, P. (2014). The effect of topic selection control on EFL writing fluency.
dc.relation.referencesDueranam, B. (2012). Teaching EFL writing: Understanding and Re-thinking the Thai Experience. Journal of Alternative Perspectives in the Social Sciences. Vol 4, No 1.
dc.relation.referencesFerreiro, R. (2007). Nuevas alternativas de aprendizaje y enseñanza: aprendizaje cooperativo. Alcalá de Guadaira, Sevilla: Editorial Mad.
dc.relation.referencesFirmin, M. (2008). Unstructured interview. The SAGE Encyclopedia of qualitative research methods. Retrieved from https://sk.sagepub.com/reference/research/n475.xml
dc.relation.referencesFortune, J. (2012). The forbidden fruit: using the mother tongue in a Bogota university EFL programme. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 14(2), 70-87. Retrieved May 31, 2020, from http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0123-46412012000200006&lng=en&tlng=en.
dc.relation.referencesFoster, P. & Ohta, A. (2005). Negotiation for meaning and peer assistance in second language classrooms. Applied linguistics. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/31062007_Negotiation_for_Meaning_and_Peer_Assistance_in_Second_Language_Classrooms
dc.relation.referencesFreeman, D. (1998). Doing teacher research: from inquiry to understanding. Heinle & Heinle, Pacific Grove.
dc.relation.referencesFrench, J. R. P., Raven, B. (1959) The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright and A. Zander. Group dynamics. New York: Harper & Row.
dc.relation.referencesGaravito, D. (2018) Enhancing oral production skills and students’ attitudes through collaborative learning in seventh grade students. Universidad Pedagógica Nacional.
dc.relation.referencesGreenwood, R.D. (2017). Students’ Affective Responses to Computer Mediated Peer Feedback. Retrieved from https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Students%E2%80%99-Affective-Responses-to-Computer-Mediated-Greenwood/5efa9aaec3f1157c2c08a869de82d169f1593135
dc.relation.referencesHagström, C. & Rivano, J. (2017). Qualitative questionnaires as a method for information studies research. Lund university publications. V (XXII). Retrieved from https://lup.lub.lu.se/search/publication/b0a94378-b556-4b59-914a-3b281cf3770d
dc.relation.referencesHatch, J. A. (2002). Doing qualitative research in education settings. Albany: State University of New York Press.
dc.relation.referencesHedge, T. (2000). Teaching and Learning in the Language Classroom. Oxford University Press
dc.relation.referencesHerazo, J. D., Jerez, S. & Lorduy Arellano, D. (2009). Learning through Communication in the EFL Class: Going beyond the PPP Approach. Íkala. 14(3), pp.117-136.
dc.relation.referencesHernandez, R. Fernandez, C. and Baptista, P. (2010). Metodología de la investigación. (5ª Ed.). México: McGraw Hill Educación
dc.relation.referencesHojeij, Z. and Baroudi, S. (2018). Student perceptions on peer feedback training using a blended method: A UAE case. Issues in educational research. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327076070_Student_perceptions_on_peer_feedback_training_using_a_blended_method_A_UAE_case
dc.relation.referencesHu, G. (2005). Using peer review with Chinese ESL student writers. Language Teaching Research, 9(3), 321–342. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1191/1362168805lr169oa
dc.relation.referencesHyland, K. (2009). Teaching and researching writing. Edinburgh, United Kingdom. Pearson.
dc.relation.referencesHymes, D.H. (1972) On Communicative Competence In: J.B. Pride and J. Holmes (eds) Sociolinguistics. Selected Readings. Harmondsworth: Penguin
dc.relation.referencesKaradoc, D. & Köse, G. (2017) The impact of vocabulary knowledge on reading, writing and proficiency scores of EFL learners. Journal of language and linguistic studies. 13(1), 352-378; 2017
dc.relation.referencesKim, B. (2006) Social Constructivism. New York. Routledge
dc.relation.referencesKlimova, B. (2015). The role of feedback in EFL classes. University of Hradec Kralove, 172. Retrieved from https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/81125292.pdf
dc.relation.referencesJohnson, D.W., & Johnson, F. (2009). Joining together: Group theory and group skills (10th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
dc.relation.referencesKibbe, T. (2017). The history of communicative language teaching (CLT) and its use in the classroom. United States Military Academy during Academic Year 2017.
dc.relation.referencesLeigh, S. & MacGregor, J. (1992). What is collaborative learning? National Center on Postsecondary Teaching, Learning, and Assessment at Pennsylvania State University.
dc.relation.referencesLundstrom, K. and Baker, W. (2009). “To give is better than to receive: The benefits of peer review to the reviewers own writing”, Journal of Second Language Writing, 18, 1: 30-43
dc.relation.referencesMcLeod, S. A. (2018). Jean Piaget's theory of cognitive development. Retrieved from https://www.simplypsychology.org/piaget.html.
dc.relation.referencesMercer, N., & Fisher, E. (1992). How do teachers help childen to learn? An analysis of teachers' interventions in computer-based activities. Learning and Instruction, 2(4), 339–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-4752(92)90022-E
dc.relation.referencesMiftah, M. (2012). Enhancing writing ability through idea listing technique. State Islamic Institute of Palangka Raya, Indonesia.
dc.relation.referencesMin, H. T. (2005). Training students to become successful peer reviewers. System, 33(2), 293–308.
dc.relation.referencesMinisterio de educación nacional (n.d.). Programa nacional de bilingüismo Colombia 2004 – 2019
dc.relation.referencesMinisterio de educación nacional (n.d.). Lengua extranjera. Retrieved from https://www.mineducacion.gov.co/1759/w3-article-364450.html?_noredirect=1
dc.relation.referencesMohite, M. (2014). An investigation into the English language writing strategies used by Polish EFL secondary school learners. London Metropolitan University.
dc.relation.referencesNavarrete, M, Fuica, M, & Sáez, L. (2019). Uso del feedback correctivo indirecto metalingüístico y su efecto en la adquisición de aspectos gramaticales en estudiantes de pedagogía en inglés de una universidad chilena. Revista Educación, 43(2), 271-287. https://dx.doi.org/10.15517/revedu.v43i2.31933
dc.relation.referencesNunan, D. (1999). Second Language Teaching and learning. Boston, Massachusetts: Heinle and Heinle publishers.
dc.relation.referencesOmaggio, A. (1986). Teaching language in context. United States of America. Heinle and Heinle publishers.
dc.relation.referencesPalinkas, L. Horwitz, S. Green, C. Wisdom, J. Duan, N. Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and policy in health. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/258315317_Purposeful_Sampling_for_Qualitative_Data_Collection_and_Analysis_in_Mixed_Method_Implementation_Research
dc.relation.referencesPerrenoud, Ph. (2008). La evaluación de los alumnos: de la producción de la excelencia a la regulación de los aprendizajes. Entre dos lógicas. Porto Alegre, Buenos Aires: Alternativa Pedagógica.
dc.relation.referencesRahman, Md. (2016). The advantages and disadvantages of using qualitative and quantitative approaches and methods in language “testing and assessment” research: a literature review. Journal of education and learning. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/309889936_The_Advantages_and_Disadvantages_of_Using_Qualitative_and_Quantitative_Approaches_and_Methods_in_Language_Testing_and_Assessment_Research_A_Literature_Review
dc.relation.referencesRichards, J. (2012) Autonomous learner. Retrieved on Jan 20th 2020 from https://www.professorjackrichards.com/autonomous-learner/
dc.relation.referencesRollinson, P. (2005). Using Peer Feedback in the ESL Writing Class: ELT Journal, 59, 23-30. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/cci003
dc.relation.referencesRoosevelt F.D. (2008). "Zone of Proximal Development." Encyclopedia of Educational Psychology SAGE publication.
dc.relation.referencesRouhi, A. and Azizian, E. (2013). Peer review: Is giving corrective feedback better than receiving it in L2 writing? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences
dc.relation.referencesRuíz, S. (2013) Working by projects: A way to enrich critical thinking and the writing process in a third grade EFL classroom: Colombian applied linguistics journal. V. 15, 205 - 220
dc.relation.referencesSagor, R. (2005). The action research guidebook: A four-step process for educators and school teams. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Corwin Press.
dc.relation.referencesShabani, K., Khatib, M., & Ebadi, S. (2010). Vygotsky's Zone of Proximal Development: Instructional Implications and Teachers' Professional Development. English language teaching, 3(4), 237-248.
dc.relation.referencesShatz, I (2017). Native Language Influence During Second Language Acquisition: A Large-Scale Learner Corpus Analysis. Proceedings of the Pacific Second Language Research Forum (PacSLRF 2016). Hiroshima, Japan: Japan Second Language Association. pp. 175–180.
dc.relation.referencesShaughnessy, P. (1977). Errors and expectations: a guide for the teacher of basic writing. New York: Oxford University Press.
dc.relation.referencesStrauss, A. L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511557842
dc.relation.referencesStrauss, A. and Corbin, J. (1994) Grounded Theory Methodology – An Overview, In Handbook of Qualitative Research, N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, pp. 273-285.
dc.relation.referencesTsui, A. B., & Ng, M. (2000). Do secondary L2 writers benefit from peer comments? Journal of second language writing, 9(2), 147-170.
dc.relation.referencesVan Lier, L. (2004). The ecology and semiotics of language learning : a sociocultural perspective. Boston: Kluwer Academic
dc.relation.referencesVygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner & E. Souberman., Eds.) (A. R. Luria, M. Lopez-Morillas & M. Cole [with J. V. Wertsch], Trans.) Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. (Original manuscripts [ca. 1930-1934])
dc.relation.referencesVygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
dc.relation.referencesWang, W. (2015) How proficiency-pairing affects students’ peer-mediated revisions of EFL writing: three case studies. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/276079367_How_Proficiency-Pairing_Affects_Students'_Peer-Mediated_Revisions_of_EFL_Writing_Three_Case_Studies
dc.relation.referencesWang, X. (2006). Inhibitory control by an integral feedback signal in prefrontal cortex: a model of discrimination between sequential stimuli. US national library of medicine national institutes of health. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16371469
dc.relation.referencesWells, G. (1999) Dialogic inquiry towards a sociocultural practice and theory of education. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/245919622_Dialogic_Inquiry_Towards_a_Sociocultural_Practice_and_Theory_of_Education
dc.relation.referencesWhite, R. and Arndt, V. (1991) Process Writing. Essex: Addison Wesley Longman Ltd.
dc.relation.referencesVerenikina, I. (2003). Understanding scaffolding and the ZPD in educational research. Proceedings of The Joint AARE/NZARE Conference. Retrieved from http://www.aare.edu.au/03pap/ver03682.pdf
dc.relation.referencesYang, L. & Wilson, K. (2006). Second language classroom reading: a social constructivist approach. The reading matrix. Vol. 6, No. 3, December 2006. 5th Anniversary Special Issue — CALL Technologies and the Digital Learner.
dc.relation.referencesYusnani (2018). Theoretical perspectives on cooperative learning. The 1st Annual International Conference on Language and Literature. Medan, Indonesia.
dc.relation.referencesZiad, A. (2013). The Negotiation of Meaning: contributions to Second Language acquisition (SLA). Retrieved on Jan 20th 2020 from https://www.moroccoworldnews.com/2013/05/89533/the-negotiation-of-meaning-contributions-to-second-language-acquisition-sla-2/
dc.relation.referencesZubaidi, N. (2015). Sociocultural theory. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/277892662_Sociocultural_Theory
dc.rights.accessAcceso abiertospa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.creativecommonsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectPeer editioneng
dc.subjectEFL writingeng
dc.subjectCommunicative competenceeng
dc.subjectSocial constructivismeng
dc.subjectCooperative learningeng
dc.titlePeer edition as a means for fostering EFL short story writing in a local private school an action research.eng
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdcceng
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesiseng
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.type.localTesis/Trabajo de grado - Monografía - Maestríaspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.type.versionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
Peer_edition_as_a_means_for_fostering_EFL_short_story_writing_in_a_local_private_school_an_Action_Research.pdf
Tamaño:
2.15 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Documento escrito

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 2 de 2
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
1.71 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción:
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
licencia_uso_trabajos_y_tesis_grado_ (1).pdf
Tamaño:
153.42 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción: