Motivación, andamiaje metacognitivo y su influencia en el aprendizaje de la habilidad lectora en inglés en un ambiente computacional.

dc.contributor.advisorSarmiento Vela, Luis Carlosspa
dc.contributor.authorGómez Jiménez, Carlos Albertospa
dc.coverage.spatialBogotá, Colombiaspa
dc.coverage.temporalSiglo XXIspa
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-14T14:59:42Z
dc.date.available2023-08-14T14:59:42Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.description.abstractEl presente trabajo de grado tuvo como objetivo establecer las diferencias en el logro de aprendizaje de lectura en inglés y en la percepción en la motivación intrínseca y extrínseca en estudiantes de secundaria cuando interactúan con un ambiente computacional que involucra un andamiaje metacognitivo y un módulo que apoya la motivación de los sujetos. El estudio se realizó con 73 estudiantes de grado décimo del colegio Rufino José Cuervo IED en Bogotá. La investigación siguió un diseño cuasi-experimental. Para el estudio se dividieron los estudiantes en 4 grupos de la siguiente manera: (a) un grupo control sin ningún andamiaje, (b) un grupo con andamiaje metacognitivo, (c) un grupo con módulo de motivación y (d) un grupo con andamiaje combinado, tanto metacognitivo como motivacional. El ambiente se realizó por medio de la plataforma Moodle con un diseño de 4 módulos basados en el Modelo Interactivo de lectura. Para medir el logro de aprendizaje de lectura en inglés se utilizó un examen estandarizado KET en el componente lector. La percepción en la motivación intrínseca y extrínseca de los estudiantes se identificó con el Cuestionario MSLQ en los subcomponentes de orientación intrínseca y extrínseca. Para los resultados se utilizó un MANCOVA factorial. Los resultados mostraron que el uso de andamiaje combinado tuvo un efecto significativo en el logro de aprendizaje lector en inglés respecto a los demás grupos. Por otro lado, la percepción de los estudiantes tanto de la orientación intrínseca como extrínseca en el grupo con andamiaje combinado fue significativamente positiva respecto al grupo con andamiaje metacognitivo. Los hallazgos respaldan estudios previos que señalan efectos positivos de los andamiajes en el logro de aprendizaje y en la percepción de motivación y señalan la importancia de combinar andamiajes para mejores resultados. La investigación fue una contribución al componente lector del aprendizaje en inglés, al uso de andamiajes metacognitivo y motivacional y a la percepción de la motivación intrínseca y extrínseca.spa
dc.description.abstractenglishThe aim of this degree work was to establish the differences in the achievement of reading comprehension learning in English and in the perception of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in high school students when they interact with a computer-based learning environment that involves a metacognitive scaffolding and a module that supports the motivation of the subjects. The study was carried out with 73 tenth grade students from the Rufino José Cuervo IED school in Bogotá. The research followed a quasi-experimental design. For the study, the students were divided into 4 groups as follows: (a) a control group without any scaffolding, (b) a group with metacognitive scaffolding, (c) a group with a motivation module, and (d) a group with combined scaffolding, both metacognitive and motivational. The environment was carried out through the Moodle platform with a design of 4 modules based on the Interactive Reading Model. To measure reading comprehension achievement in English, a KET standardized test was used in the reading component. The perception of the intrinsic and extrinsic motivation of the students was identified with the MSLQ Questionnaire in the subcomponents of intrinsic and extrinsic orientation. For the results, a factorial MANCOVA was used. The results showed that the use of combined scaffolding had a significant effect on the achievement of reading comprehension learning in English compared to the other groups. On the other hand, the students' perception of both intrinsic and extrinsic orientation in the group with combined scaffolding was significantly positive compared to the group with metacognitive scaffolding. The findings support previous studies that indicate positive effects of scaffolding on learning achievement and perceived motivation and point out the importance of combining scaffolding for better results. The research was a contribution to the reading component of English learning, the use of metacognitive and motivational scaffolding, and the perception of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation.eng
dc.description.degreelevelMaestríaspa
dc.description.degreenameMagister en Tecnologías de la Información aplicadas a la Educaciónspa
dc.formatPDFspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad Pedagógica Nacionalspa
dc.identifier.reponamereponame: Repositorio Institucional UPNspa
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl: http://repositorio.pedagogica.edu.co/
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12209/18803
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisherUniversidad Pedagógica Nacionalspa
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Ciencia y Tecnologíaspa
dc.publisher.programMaestría en Tecnologías de la Información aplicadas a la Educaciónspa
dc.relation.referencesÁlvarez, J. (2020). Relación de la motivación intrínseca y extrínseca con el aprendizaje del idioma inglés en el grado once. Educación a Distancia. Universidad de Cuauhtemoc. Estado de Aguascalientes, México.
dc.relation.referencesÁlvarez, J. & Ochoa, J. (2021). La motivación intrínseca y extrínseca en el aprendizaje del idioma inglés: un estudio de caso en estudiantes universitarios de la ciudad de Medellín. Cuadernos de Educación y Desarrollo. 38-47. 10.51896/atlante/GEAI9779.
dc.relation.referencesAtkinson, J. W. (1964). An Introduction to Motivation. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand.
dc.relation.referencesAkbari, H. Ghonsooly, B. Ghazanfari, M & Ghapanchi, Z. (2019) Enriching the Construct Structure of L2 Reading Motivation: Learners’ Attitudes in Focus, Reading Psychology, 40:4, 371-395, DOI: 10.1080/02702711.2019.1614126
dc.relation.referencesAmes, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261}271.
dc.relation.referencesAryadoust V. & Baghaei, P. (2016) Does EFL Readers' Lexical and Grammatical Knowledge Predict Their Reading Ability? Insights From a Perceptron Artificial Neural Network Study, Educational Assessment, 21:2, 135-156, DOI: 10.1080/10627197.2016.1166343.
dc.relation.referencesAzevedo, R., & Hadwin, A. F. (2005). Scaffolding self-regulated learning and metacognition Implications for the design of computer-based scaffolds. Instructional Science, 33(5–6), 367–379. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-005-1272-9
dc.relation.referencesAzevedo, R.; Moos, D.; Greene, J.; Winters, F. y Cromley, J. (2008). Why is externally-facilitated regulated learning more effective than self-regulated learning with hypermedia? Education Tech Research, Dev 56, 45-72.
dc.relation.referencesBahari, A., Zhang, X., & Ardasheva, Y. (2021). Establishing a computer-assisted interactive reading model. Computers & Education, 172, Article 104261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104261
dc.relation.referencesBandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
dc.relation.referencesBelland, B. R., Kim, C. M., & Hannafin, M. J. (2013). A Framework for Designing Scaffolds That Improve Motivation and Cognition. Educational Psychologist, 48(4), 243-270. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2013.838920
dc.relation.referencesBradya, M., Selia, H. y Rosenthalb, J. (2013). “Clickers” and metacognition: A quasi-experimental comparative study about metacognitive self-regulation and use of electronic feedback devices. Computers & Education, 65, 56-63.
dc.relation.referencesBussert-Webb, K & Zhang, Z (2017). Positive reading attitudes of low-income bilingual latinos. Reading Psychology. 39. 1-30. 10.1080/02702711.2017.1383331.
dc.relation.referencesCamacho-Miñano, M. M., & Del Campo, C. (2015). Impacto de la motivación intrínseca en el rendimiento académico a través de trabajos voluntarios: Un análisis empírico. Revista Complutense de Educacion, 26 67–80. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_RCED.2015.v26.n1.42581
dc.relation.referencesCEPAL (2020). Universalizar el acceso a las tecnologías digitales para enfrentar los efectos del COVID-19. Informe especial Covid-19, 7. Recuperado de: https://repositorio.cepal.org/bitstream/handle/11362/45938/S2000550_es.pdf?sequence=4&isAllowed=y.
dc.relation.referencesChang, K. E., Chen, Y. L., Lin, H. Y. y Sung, Y. T. (2008). Effects of learning support in simulation-based physics learning. Computers & Education, 51(4), 1486-1498.
dc.relation.referencesChiang, K., Fan, C., Liu, H., & Chen, G. D. (2016). Effects of a computer-assisted argument map learning strategy on sixth-grade students’ argumentative essay reading comprehension. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 75, 9973–9990. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-015-2904-y
dc.relation.referencesChow, B. W.-Y., Hui, A. N. N., and Chui, B. H.-T. (2018) Creative literacy activities promote positive reading attitude in children learning English as a foreign language. Journal of Research in Reading, 41: 278– 289. doi: 10.1111/1467-9817.12096.
dc.relation.referencesCocio, A. (2015). Ansiedad y motivación en el aprendizaje del inglés como lengua extranjera (Tesis Doctoral, Universidad de Deusto).
dc.relation.referencesCornejo, T (2002). Modelamiento metacognitivo: un aprendizaje de estrategias para la comprensión de lectura. Horizontes Educacionales, (7), 64-70.
dc.relation.referencesCrippen, K. J. y Earl, B. L. (2007). The impact of web-based worked examples and self-explanation on performance, problem solving, and self-efficacy. Computers & Education, 49(3), 809-821.
dc.relation.referencesCrookes, G., & Schmidt, R. W. (1991). Motivation: Reopening the Research Agenda. Language Learning, 41, 469-512. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1991.tb00690.x
dc.relation.referencesDabarera, C., Renandya, W. A., & Zhang, L. J. (2014). The impact of metacognitive scaffolding and monitoring on reading comprehension. System, 42, 462-473.
dc.relation.referencesDavis, E. A. (2000). Scaffolding students’ knowledge integration: Prompts for reflection in KIE. International Journal of Science Education, 22(8), 819-837.
dc.relation.referencesDeci, E. L. (1971). Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 18(1), 105–115. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0030644
dc.relation.referencesDeci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1987). The support of autonomy and the control of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(6), 1024–1037. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.53.6.1024
dc.relation.referencesDelen, E., Liew J. y Willson V. (2014). Effects of interactivity and instructional scaffolding on learning: Self-regulation in online video-based environments. Computers & Education, 78, 312 -320.
dc.relation.referencesDelmastro, A. L. (2010). El andamiaje metacognitivo en contextos de aprendizaje de una lengua extranjera. Didáctica. Lengua Y Literatura, 22, 93 - 124. Recuperado a partir de https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/DIDA/article/view/DIDA1010110093A
dc.relation.referencesDiaz, S. & Laguado, J. (2013). Improving reading skills through skimming and scanning techniques at a public school: Action research. Opening Writing Doors Journal, 10(1), 133-150.
dc.relation.referencesDomínguez Alonso, J., & Pino-Juste, M. R. (2014). Motivación intrínseca y extrínseca: análisis en adolescentes gallegos. Revista INFAD de Psicología " International Journal of Developmental and Educational Psychology", 1(1), 349-358.
dc.relation.referencesDörnyei, Z. & Ottó, I. (1998) Motivation in action: a process model of L2 motivation, Working papers in applied linguistics, 4, pp. 43-69, Disponible en: http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/3970/Motivation_in_action.pdf [22/10/20212]
dc.relation.referencesDörnyei, Z. (2005) The Psychology of the Language Learner. Individual Differences in second Language Adquisition, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
dc.relation.referencesDörnyei, Z. & Ushioda, E. (2011) Teaching and researching motivation, Harlow, UK: Addison Wesley Longman.
dc.relation.referencesDjuwarsih, (2006). Learning and Teaching Strategies. Penerbit Wijaya Saputra. Jakarta.
dc.relation.referencesDuque, W. A. (2020). Ambiente virtual con software motivacional y su efecto en el logro de aprendizaje, el monitoreo del aprendizaje, la gestión del tiempo y el estilo cognitivo en la Dimensión DIC. Recuperado de: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12209/13280.
dc.relation.referencesDuke, N. K., & Pearson, P. D. (2009). Effective practices for developing reading comprehension. Journal of Education, 189(1–2), 107–122. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022057409189001-208
dc.relation.referencesDweck, C. S., Elliott, E. S. (1983). Achievement motivation. In E. M. Hetherington, Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 4. Socialization, personality, and social development. New York: Wiley.
dc.relation.referencesEccles, J. (1983). Expectancies, values and academic behaviors. In J. T. Spence, Achievement and achievement motives (pp. 75}146). San Francisco: Freeman.
dc.relation.referencesEducation First (2022). Education First English Proficiency Index “América Latina”. [Education First English Proficiency Index “Latin America)].. Recuperado de: https://www.ef.com.ec/epi/downloads/
dc.relation.referencesErikson, E. (1963) Childhood and society, New York: Norton.
dc.relation.referencesFaraj, A. K. A. (2015). Scaffolding EFL Students' Writing through the Writing Process Approach. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(13), 131-141.
dc.relation.referencesField, A. (2000). Discovering statistics using spss for windows. London-Thousand Oaks- New Delhi: Sage publications. Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS. London: SAGE
dc.relation.referencesFlorez, N. (2018). Andamiaje de tipo metacognitivo para el desarrollo de habilidades metacognitivas y el logro de aprendizaje de las Ciencias Naturales en estudiantes Básica Primaria con diferente estilo cognitivo en la dimensión DIC.
dc.relation.referencesGamboa, Á. M. (2017). Comprensión de lectura en inglés como lengua extranjera. La enseñanza de estrategias para estudiantes de sexto grado a partir del modelo interactivo de lectura. Recuperado de: http://repositorio.pedagogica.edu.co/handle/20.500.12209/5816 .
dc.relation.referencesGardner, R. C. (1985) Social Psychology and Second Language Learning, the roles of attitudes and motivation, London: Edward Arnold.
dc.relation.referencesGardner, R. C. (2004). Attitude/Motivation test battery: International AMTB research project. Canada: The University of Western Ontario.
dc.relation.referencesGardner, R. C. & Lambert, W. (1959) Motivational variables in Second Language Acquisition, Canadian Journal of Psychology, 13, pp 266-272.
dc.relation.referencesGil, L., Bråten, I., Vidal-Abarca, E., & Strømsø, H. I. (2010). Summary versus argument tasks when working with multiple documents: Which is better for whom? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 3, 157–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2009.11.002
dc.relation.referencesGonzález-Torres, M.C.; Tourón, J. e Iriarte, C. (1994). ""Autoconcepto, motivación y rendimiento escolar en alumnos de 5º de EGB"". Revista de Psicología de la Educación, 14, pp. 25-44
dc.relation.referencesGravetter, F., & Wallnau, L. (2014). Essentials of statistics for the behavioral sciences (8th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
dc.relation.referencesHancock, O. (1999).Reading skills. Adeleide, South Australia: The International Reading Association
dc.relation.referencesHannafin, M. J., Land, S., & Oliver, K. M. (1999). Open learning environments: Foundations, methods, and models. In C. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: Volume II (pp. 115–140). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
dc.relation.referencesHarackiewicz, J. M. (1979). The effects of reward contingency and performance feedback on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(8), 1352–1363. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.37.8.1352
dc.relation.referencesHarackiewicz, J. M., & Elliot, A. J. (1993). Achievement goals and intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(5), 904–915. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.5.904
dc.relation.referencesHederich, C. Camargo, A. & López, O. (2021). Andamiajes computacionales para favorecer la autorregulación del aprendizaje: una revisión de investigaciones. Catálogo editorial. 114-150. 10.15765/poli.v1i613.1794.
dc.relation.referencesHelland, T., Tjus, T., Hovden, M., Ofte, S., & Heimann, M. (2011). Effects of a bottom–up and a top– down intervention principle in emergent literacy in children at risk of developmental dyslexia. A longitudinal study. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 44(2), 105–122, 10.1177%2F0022219410391188.
dc.relation.referencesHernández, M. J., (2007). Del pretexto al texto. La lectura en la enseñanza/aprendizaje de idiomas y su tratamiento en español como lengua extranjera. marcoELE. Revista de Didáctica Español Lengua Extranjera, (5), 1-11.
dc.relation.referencesHidalgo Díez, E. & Manzano Díaz, M. (2014). El proceso de comprensión en una lengua extranjera: Una propuesta para evaluar estrategias de lectura. Educación XX1, 17 (1), 9-326. doi: 10.5944/educxx1.17.1.10716
dc.relation.referencesHill, J. R., & Hannafin, M. J. (2001). Teaching and learning in digital environments: The resurgence of resource-based learning. Educational technology research and development, 49(3), 37-52.
dc.relation.referencesJoseph, L. M., Alber-Morgan, S., & Neef, N. (2016). Applying behavior analytic procedures to effectively teach literacy skills in the classroom. Psychology in the Schools, 53, 73–88. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21883
dc.relation.referencesKrashen, S. (2009). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. California -First internet edition.
dc.relation.referencesKember, D., & Gow, L. (1994). An Examination of the Interactive Model of Esl Reading From the Perspective of Approaches To Studying. RELC Journal, 25(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/003368829402500101
dc.relation.referencesKintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
dc.relation.referencesKao, G. Y. M., Tsai, C., Liu, C. Y., & Yang, C. H. (2016). The effects of high/low interactive electronic storybooks on elementary school students’ reading motivation, story comprehension and chromatics concepts. Computers & Education, 100, 56–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.04.013
dc.relation.referencesLam, K., Chen, X., & Deacon, S.H. (2019). The Role of Awareness of Cross-Language Suffix Correspondences in Second-Language Reading Comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 55( 0), 29– 43. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.257
dc.relation.referencesLeader, L. & Klein, J. (1996). The effects of search tool type and cognitive style on performance during hypermedia database searches. Educational Technology Research and Development, 44 (2).
dc.relation.referencesLópez, O. (2010). Aprendizaje autorregulado, estilo cognitivo y logro académico en ambientes computacionales (Tesis doctoral). Universidad Pedagógica Nacional.
dc.relation.referencesLópez, O (2015) Diseño de andamiajes computacionales para apoyar la autonomía en el aprendizaje. Educación y Tecnologías de la Información y la Comunicación, 47.
dc.relation.referencesLópez, O., Sanabria, L. B., & Buitrago, N. C. (2018). Efecto diferencial de un andamiaje metacognitivo sobre la autorregulación y el logro de aprendizaje en un ambiente de aprendizaje combinado. Tecné, Episteme y Didaxis: TED, (44), 33-50.
dc.relation.referencesLópez, O., Sanabria, L., & Sanabria, M. (2014). Logro de aprendizaje en ambientes computacionales: autoeficacia, metas y estilo cognitivo. Psicología desde el Caribe, 31(3), 475-494. https://doi.org/10.14482/psdc.31.3.5366
dc.relation.referencesLópez, O. & Hederich, C. (2010). Efecto de un andamiaje para facilitar el aprendizaje autorregulado en ambientes hipermedia. Revista colombiana de educación, 14-39.
dc.relation.referencesLópez, O., Hederich, C., & Camargo, Á. (2012). Logro en matemáticas, autorregulación del aprendizaje y estilo cognitivo. Suma Psicológica, 19(2), 39-50.
dc.relation.referencesLópez, O. & Triana, S. (2013). Efecto de un activador computacional de autoeficacia sobre el logro de aprendizaje en estudiantes de diferente estilo cognitivo. Revista Colombiana de Educación, 64, 225-244.
dc.relation.referencesLópez, O., Ibáñez, J., & Racines, O. (2017). Students’ Metacognition and Cognitive Style and Their Effect on Cognitive Load and Learning Achievement. Educational Technology & Society, 20(3), 145-157.
dc.relation.referencesLópez, O., Ibáñez, J., & Chiguasuque, E. (2014). El estilo cognitivo y la fijación de metas de aprendizaje en ambientes computacionales. Pensamiento Psicológico, 12(1), 133-148. Retrieved July 31, 2023, from http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1657-89612014000100010&lng=en&tlng=es.
dc.relation.referencesLutz, S. L., Guthrie, J. T., & Davis, M. H. (2006). Scaffolding for engagement in elementary school reading instruction. Journal of Educational Research, 100, 3–20. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.100.1.3-20
dc.relation.referencesManlove, S., Lazonder, A. W. y de Jong, T. (2009). Trends and issues of regulative support use during inquiry learning: Patterns from three studies. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(4), 795-803.
dc.relation.referencesMartínez, W., & Esquivel, I. (2017). Efectos de la instrucción de estrategias de lectura, mediadas por TIC en la comprensión lectora del inglés. 8, 38–53
dc.relation.referencesMason, L., Zaccoletti, S., Scrimin, S., Tornatora, M. C., Florit, E., & Goetz, T. (2020). Reading with the eyes and under the skin: Comprehending conflicting digital texts. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36, 89–101. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12399
dc.relation.referencesMikulecky, B. S. (2008). Teaching reading in a second language. London: Pearson.
dc.relation.referencesMostafa, H. M. E., Dadour, E. S., & Qoura, A. A. (2019). Using a computer-based scaffolding strategy to enhance EFL preparatory stage students' reading skills and self-regulation. Journal of Research in Curriculum Instruction and Educational Technology, 5(1), 111-134.
dc.relation.referencesMolenaar, I., Roda, C., Boxtel, C. & Sleegers, P. (2012). Dynamic scaffolding of socially reg-ulated learning in a computer-based learning environment. Computers & Education, 59(2), 515-523.
dc.relation.referencesMoreno, G. L. (2019). Representación ontológica para la comprensión lectora en lengua extranjera. Recuperado de: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12209/11569.
dc.relation.referencesMuriel, J. M. F., & Mora, M. C. F. (2018). Comprender el proceso lector en segundas lenguas: Cognición y afectividad / Understanding the reading process in a second language: cognition and affect. Tejuelo. Didáctica de la Lengua y Literatura, 28.
dc.relation.referencesNadea, A. & Jumariati, Jumariati & Nasrullah, Nasrullah. (2021). Bottom-up or Top-down Reading Strategies: Reading Strategies Used by EFL Students. 10.2991/assehr.k.211021.005.
dc.relation.referencesO’Keeffe, A., McCarthy, M., & Carter, R. (2007). From corpus to classroom: Language use and language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511497650
dc.relation.referencesObservatorio a la gestión Educativa FExE. (2023). Análisis de resultados Pruebas Saber 11°. Recuperado de https://obsgestioneducativa.com/download/analisis-de-resultados-pruebas-saber-11-2022/
dc.relation.referencesOCDE (2019). Programa para la Evaluación Internacional de AlumnosOecd.org. Recuperado e de https://www.oecd.org/pisa/publications/PISA2018_CN_COL_ESP.pdf
dc.relation.referencesOlson, V, A. & Ames, S.W. (1972). Teaching and researching reading in secondary school.Atlanta: Georgia State University.
dc.relation.referencesOz, H., Demirezen, M. & Pourfeiz, J. (2015). Digital Device Ownership, Computer Literacy, And Attitudes Toward Foreign And Computer-Assisted Language Learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 186. 359-366. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.028.
dc.relation.referencesPintrich, P. R. & Schunk. D. (2006): Motivación en contextos educativos. Teoría, investigación y aplicaciones. Madrid: Pearson Education.
dc.relation.referencesPintrich, P. R. (1999). The Role of Motivation in Promoting and Sustaining Self-Regulated Learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 31, 459-470.
dc.relation.referencesPorras, N. (2010). Teaching English through Stories: A Meaningful and Fun Way for Children to Learn the Language. Revistas electrónicas UN.
dc.relation.referencesQuintero, J. (2007). Seminario Teorías y paradigmas educativos. Universidad Fermin Toro, escuela de Doctorado. Venezuela. Recuperado de http://doctorado.josequintero.net
dc.relation.referencesReiser, B. (2004). Scaffolding Complex Learning: The Mechanisms of Structuring and Problematizing Student Work. Journal Of The Learning Sciences. 13. 273-304. 10.1207/s15327809jls1303_2.
dc.relation.referencesReynolds, D., & Daniel, S. (2018). Toward contingency in scaffolding reading comprehension: Next steps for research. Reading Research Quarterly, 53(3), 367-373.
dc.relation.referencesRodríguez Lifante, A. (2015). Motivación y actitudes como variables afectivas en aprendices griegos de español como lengua extranjera (Tesis doctoral-Universidad de Alicante), Alicante: Universidad de Alicante.
dc.relation.referencesRotter, J. B. (1954). Social Learning and Clinical Psychology. New York, NY: Prentice-Hall.
dc.relation.referencesRoss, M. (1975). Salience of reward and intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32(2), 245–254. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.32.2.245
dc.relation.referencesRumelhart, D. E. (1985). Toward an interactive model of reading. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
dc.relation.referencesRyan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
dc.relation.referencesSánchez, A.. (2012). El bilingüismo en los bachilleres colombianos: Documentos de trabajo sobre economía regional. Cartagena, núm. 159, Banco de la República.
dc.relation.referencesSaine, N. L., Lerkkanen, M.-K., Ahonen, T., Tolvanen, A., & Lyytinen, H. (2011). Computer-assisted remedial reading intervention for school beginners at risk for reading disability. Child Development, 82, 1013–1028. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01580.x
dc.relation.referencesSasmita, A. (2013). The effectiveness of skimming and scanning training on reading comprehension achievement in English. Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 1(12), 34-39.
dc.relation.referencesSchunk, D. (1985). Self-efficacy and school learning. Psychology in the Schools, 22, 208}223.
dc.relation.referencesSchunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (Eds.). (1994). Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational applications. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
dc.relation.referencesSimanjuntak, E (1989).Developing reading skills for EFL students. Jakarta P2 LPTK
dc.relation.referencesStetter, M. E. y Hughes, M. T. (2011). Computer assisted instruction to promote comprehension in students with learning disabilities. International Journal of Special Education, 26(1), 88-100.
dc.relation.referencesSutz, R., & Weverka, P. (2009). Speed reading for dummies.Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Pub.
dc.relation.referencesThamrin, N. S. (2014). Scanning technique in developing students’ reading comprehension. Kreatif, 15(1), 31-35.
dc.relation.referencesTrochim, W. M., & Donnelly, J. P. (2006). The research methods knowledge base (3rd ed.). Cincinnati, OH:Atomic Dog.
dc.relation.referencesUlmi, L. N. H., Sundari, S., & Sukmaantara, I. P. (2015). The effect of using Skimming and Scanning Techniques on the eighth grade students’ reading comprehension achievement of recount texts at SMPN 1 Silo Jember. Artikel Ilmiah Mahasiswa, 1(1).
dc.relation.referencesUrquhart, A. H., & Weir, C. J. (1998). Reading in a second language: Process, product and practice. London and New York: Longman.
dc.relation.referencesVillanueva, E. (2006). Applying current approaches to the teaching of reading. English Teaching Forum. (1). 8-15.
dc.relation.referencesWeiner, B. (1985). An Attributional Theory of Achievement Motivation and Emotion. Psychological review. 92. 548-73. 10.1037/0033-295X.92.4.548.
dc.relation.referencesWolters, C., Yu, S., & Pintrich, P. R. (1996). The relation between goal orientation and students' motivational beliefs and self-regulated learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 8,238.
dc.relation.referencesWood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The Role of Tutoring in Problem Solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89–100.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x
dc.rights.accessAcceso abiertospa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.creativecommonsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectLectura en inglésspa
dc.subjectAndamiaje metacognitivospa
dc.subjectMotivación intrínsecaspa
dc.subjectMotivación extrínsecaspa
dc.subjectAmbiente de aprendizaje computacionalspa
dc.subjectAndamiaje motivacionalspa
dc.subjectEducación secundariaspa
dc.subjectEducación mediaspa
dc.subject.keywordsEFL reading comprehensioneng
dc.subject.keywordsMetacognitive scaffoldingeng
dc.subject.keywordsIntrinsic motivationeng
dc.subject.keywordsExtrinsic motivationeng
dc.subject.keywordsComputer - Based learning environmenteng
dc.subject.keywordsMotivational scaffoldingeng
dc.subject.keywordsSecondary school educationeng
dc.subject.keywordsHigh school educationeng
dc.titleMotivación, andamiaje metacognitivo y su influencia en el aprendizaje de la habilidad lectora en inglés en un ambiente computacional.spa
dc.title.translatedMotivation, metacognitive scaffolding and its influence on learning English reading comprehension skills in a computer-based learning environment.eng
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdcceng
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesiseng
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.type.localTesis/Trabajo de grado - Monografía - Maestríaspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.type.versionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
Gómez (2023) Motivación, andamiaje metacognitivo y su influencia en el aprendizaje de la habilidad lectora en inglés en un ambiente computacional.pdf
Tamaño:
2.54 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 2 de 2
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
1.71 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción:
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
202303650128943-03 AGOS 23 CARLOS GOMEZ.zip
Tamaño:
1.01 MB
Formato:
Unknown data format
Descripción:
Licencia aprobada