Exploring EFL Teachers’ Understanding of the Pedagogy of the Multiliteracies.

Uchuvo, Yesid Alexander

Exploring EFL Teachers’ Understanding of the Pedagogy of the Multiliteracies.

dc.contributor.advisor	Vera Rodríguez, Esperanza	spa
dc.contributor.author	Uchuvo, Yesid Alexander	spa
dc.coverage.spatial	Bogotá, Colombia	spa
dc.coverage.temporal	2018-2022	spa
dc.date.accessioned	2023-03-13T18:53:18Z
dc.date.available	2023-03-13T18:53:18Z
dc.date.issued	2022
dc.description.abstract	Esta tesis presenta una investigación cualitativa del tipo de estudio de caso cuyo objetivo fue examinar cómo las reflexiones de los profesores de inglés como lengua extranjera evidencian la comprensión de la pedagogía de las multiliteracidades y sus potenciales usos y desafíos en el marco de un curso en línea de ochenta horas de formación profesoral. Este estudio fue desarrollado con cuatro profesores en ejercicio del Politécnico Internacional IES (Bogotá, Colombia). Los datos se recolectaron a través de diarios, artefactos, así como de notas de campo apoyadas por la transcripción de audio de un taller. Las reflexiones de los participantes evidencian tres diferentes niveles de comprensión de la pedagogía de las multiliteracidades en función de su complejidad y riqueza.	spa
dc.description.abstractenglish	This master thesis accounts for a qualitative research project conducted through a case study whose objective was to examine how the EFL teachers’ reflections evidence their understanding of the pedagogy of the multiliteracies as well as its usefulness and challenges framed in an eighty-hour teacher development online course. It was developed with four in-service teachers from Politécnico Internacional IES (Bogotá, Colombia). Data were collected from logs, artifacts (forum entries and a lesson plan), and field notes supported by a workshop audio transcription. Participants’ reflections evidence three distinct levels of understanding of the pedagogy of the multiliteracies in function of its complexity and richness.	eng
dc.description.degreelevel	Maestría	spa
dc.description.degreename	Magister en Enseñanza de Lenguas Extranjeras	spa
dc.description.sponsorship	Universidad Pedagógica Nacional	spa
dc.format.mimetype	application/pdf	spa
dc.identifier.instname	instname:Universidad Pedagógica Nacional	spa
dc.identifier.reponame	reponame: Repositorio Institucional UPN	spa
dc.identifier.repourl	repourl: http://repositorio.pedagogica.edu.co/
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12209/18407
dc.language.iso	eng
dc.publisher	Universidad Pedagógica Nacional	spa
dc.publisher.faculty	Facultad de Humanidades	spa
dc.publisher.program	Maestría en Enseñanza de Lenguas Extranjeras con énfasis en Inglés/Francés	spa
dc.relation.references	Akbari, R., Behzadpoor, F., & Dadvand, B. (2010). Development of english language teaching reflection inventory. System, 38(2), 211–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2010.03.003
dc.relation.references	Aronowitz, S. & Giroux, H. (1991). Postmodern education: Politics, Culture, and social criticism. University of Minnesota Press.
dc.relation.references	Bensoussan, M. (1986). Beyond vocabulary: Pragmatic factors in reading comprehension—Culture, convention, coherence, and cohesion. Foreign Language Annals.
dc.relation.references	Breidbach, S., Medina, J., & Mihan, A. (2014). Critical literacies, multiliteracies and foreign language education. Narr Francke Attempto Verlag, 2, 91-106.
dc.relation.references	Bourdieu, P., Passeron, J. C., Nice, R., & Bottomore, T. B. (2014). Reproduction in education, society, and culture (8th ed.).
dc.relation.references	Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2016). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: learning by design. Springer.
dc.relation.references	Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2009). “Multiliteracies”: New Literacies, new learning.’ Pedagogies: An International Journal 4: 164– 195.
dc.relation.references	Creswell, J. (2003). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
dc.relation.references	Davinson, C. (2009). Transcription: imperatives for qualitative research. International journal of qualitative methods 8(2), 35-52.
dc.relation.references	Dewey, J. 1928 (2008). ‘Progressive education and the science of education.’ In John Dewey: The later works, 1925– 1953, Volume 3, 1927– 1928, edited by J. A. Boydston. University Press, pp. 257– 268.
dc.relation.references	Dörnyei, Z. (2011). Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methodologies. Oxford University Press.
dc.relation.references	Ertmer, P., & Newby, T. (1993). Behaviorism, cognitivism, constructivism: comparing critical features from an instructional design perspective. Performance improvement quarterly, 6(4), 50-72.
dc.relation.references	Farrell, T. S. C. (2009). Teaching reading to English language learners: A Reflective guide. Thousand Oaks
dc.relation.references	Ferreiro, E. (2005). Pasado y presente de los verbos leer y escribir (2ª reimp.) Fondo de Cultura Económica.
dc.relation.references	Freire, P. (1972). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Penguin.
dc.relation.references	Freire, P. (1973). Education and conscientizacao. In Education for critical consciousness (3rd ed., pp. 37-52).
dc.relation.references	Gee, J. P. (2004). Situated Language and Learning. Routledge.
dc.relation.references	Giroux, H. A. (2001). Theory and resistance in education: Towards a pedagogy for the opposition. Bergin & Garvey.
dc.relation.references	Goetze, C. (2017). Pierre Bourdieu’s toolbox: fields, power, practices, and habitus in the analysis of peacebuilding. In The distinction of peace: A social analysis of peacebuilding (pp. 15-39). University of Michigan Press.
dc.relation.references	González-Moncada, A. (2021). On the Professional Development of English Teachers in Colombia and the Historical Interplay with Language Education Policies. HOW, 28(3), 134–153. https://doi.org/10.19183/how.28.3.679
dc.relation.references	Hatch, J. A. (2004). Deciding to do qualitative study. Doing qualitative research in education settings. State University of New York, p. 1-11.
dc.relation.references	Hauptman, P. (2000). Some hypotheses on the nature of difficulty and ease in second language reading: An application of schema theory. Foreign Language Annals, 33, 622–631.
dc.relation.references	Jordan, R. R. (1997). Methodology and materials. In English for academic purposes (pp. 109-126). Cambridge University Press.
dc.relation.references	Josselson, R. (2013). Interviewing for qualitative inquiry: a relational approach. The Guilford Publications
dc.relation.references	Kalantzis, M., & Cope, B. (2008). Language education and multiliteracies. Encyclopedia of Language and Education, 1, 195-211. https://doi:10.1007/978-0-387-30424-3_15
dc.relation.references	Kalantzis, M., & Cope, W. (2009). A Grammar of Multimodality. The International Journal of Learning: Annual Review, 16(2), 361-426. https://doi:10.18848/1447-9494/cgp/v16i02/46137
dc.relation.references	Kalantzis, M., & Cope, W. (2012). Literacies. Cambridge University Press.
dc.relation.references	Kilpatrick, W. (1918). ‘The Project Method: The Use of the Purposeful Act in the Educative Process.’ Teachers College Record 19: 319– 335.
dc.relation.references	Krashen, S., Terrell, T., Ehrman, M., & Herzog, M. (1984). A theoretical basis for teaching the receptive skills. Foreign Language Annals, 17, 262–275
dc.relation.references	Kress, G. (2014). Design: the rhetorical work of shaping the semiotic world. In Archer & D. In Newfield (Eds.), Multimodal approaches to research and pedagogy: Recognition, resources, and access (pp. 186-201). Routledge.
dc.relation.references	Liaw, M. (2001). Exploring literary responses in an EFL classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 34, 35–44.
dc.relation.references	Lorenzo, F. (2005). Teaching english for specific purposes. Using English. http://www.usingenglish.com/teachers/articles/teaching-englishforspecific-purposesesp.html
dc.relation.references	Creswell, J. W., Hanson, W. E., Plano, V. L. C., & Morales, A. (2007). Qualitative research designs selection and implementation. The Counseling Psychologist, 35(2), 236-264.
dc.relation.references	Dewey, J. (1933). 9. In How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. essay, D.C. Heath.
dc.relation.references	Luke, C. (2000). Cyberschooling and technological change: Multiliteracies for new times. In B. Cope and M. Kalantzis (Eds.), Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures (pp. 69-91). Routledge.
dc.relation.references	Luke, A, Cazden, A. Lin, & Freebody, P. (2004). ‘The Singapore Classroom Coding Scheme, Technical Report.’ National Institute of Education, Center for Research on Pedagogy and Practice.
dc.relation.references	Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. Jossey-Bass.
dc.relation.references	MinEducación. (2014). Programa nacional de inglés. MinEducación
dc.relation.references	Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2012). Education at a glance. Highlights, OECD Publishing.
dc.relation.references	Montessori, M. (1964). The Montessori Method. Schocken Brooks.
dc.relation.references	Olson, D. (1998). El mundo sobre el papel. El impacto de la escritura y la lectura en la estructura del conocimiento. Gedisa.
dc.relation.references	Phillips, J. (1978). Reading is communication, too! Foreign Language Annals, 11, 281–287.
dc.relation.references	Piaget, J. (2002). Language and Thought of the Child. Routledge.
dc.relation.references	Politécnico Internacional IES. (2017). Proyecto educativo institucional (PEI). Politécnico Internacional.
dc.relation.references	Reichelt, M., & Lefkowitz, N. (2012). Key issues in foreign language writing. Foreign Language Annals, 45, 22–41.
dc.relation.references	Richards, J. (1990). Beyond training: Approaches to teacher education in language teaching. Language Teacher, 14, 3-8.
dc.relation.references	Richards, J. C., & Lockhard, C. (1994). Reflective teaching. Cambridge University Press.
dc.relation.references	Richards, J. C., & Schmidt, R. W. (2014). Longman Dictionary of Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics. Routledge.
dc.relation.references	Rugg, H. & Ann S. (1928). The Child- Centered School: An Appraisal of the New Education. World Book Company.
dc.relation.references	Seidman, I. (2006). Interviewing as a qualitative research: a guidance for researchers in Education and the social sciences. Teachers College Press. Columbia University.
dc.relation.references	Schon, D.A., (1983). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. Basic Books Inc.
dc.relation.references	Smith, L. (1978). An evolving logic of participant observation, educational ethnography, and other case studies. In L. Shulman (Ed.), Review of researching education (pp. 316-377). F. E. Peacock.
dc.relation.references	Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. SAGE Publications.
dc.relation.references	Street, B. (2009). Ethnography of writing and reading. En D. Olson y N. Torrance, (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Literacy (pp. 329-343). Cambridge University Press.
dc.relation.references	Soares, M. (1998). Letramento: um tema en três gêneros. Autêntica.
dc.relation.references	Teberosky, A. (2003): Contextos de alfabetización inicial. Cuadernos de Educación, 39. Ice-Horsori
dc.relation.references	The New London Group. (1996). A Pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60-93. https://doi:10.17763/haer.66.1.17370n67v22j160u
dc.relation.references	United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2003). Education in a multilingual world. UNESCO. https://dx.doi.org/10.1787/eag_highlights-2012-e
dc.relation.references	Walsh, C. (2013). Lo pedagógico y lo decolonial. Entretejiendo caminos. En Autor (Ed.), Pedagogías decoloniales. Prácticas insurgentes de resistir, (re)existir y (re)vivir, tomo I. Abya Yala.
dc.relation.references	Warner C, Dupuy B. Moving toward multiliteracies in foreign language teaching: Past and present perspectives ... and beyond. Foreign Language Annals. 2018;1–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12316
dc.relation.references	Windschitl, M. (2002). ‘Framing Constructivism in Practice as the Negotiation of Dilemmas: An Analysis of the Conceptual, Pedagogical, Cultural, and Political Challenges Facing Teachers.’ Review of Educational Research 72: 131– 175.
dc.relation.references	Wittgenstein, L., Pears, D., & McGuinness, B. F. (2014). Tractatus logico-philosophicus (2nd ed.). Routledge.
dc.relation.references	Yin, R. K. (2002). Case study research: Design and methods. SAGE Publications
dc.rights.access	Acceso abierto	spa
dc.rights.accessrights	info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.accessrights	http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.creativecommons	Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rights.uri	https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subject	Reflexiones y comprensión del profesor	spa
dc.subject	Pedagogía de las multiliteracidades	spa
dc.subject	EFL	spa
dc.subject	Investigación cualitativa	spa
dc.subject	Desarrollo profesional	spa
dc.subject.keywords	Teacher’s reflections and understanding	eng
dc.subject.keywords	Pedagogy of the multiliteracies	eng
dc.subject.keywords	EFL	eng
dc.subject.keywords	Qualitative research	eng
dc.subject.keywords	Professional development	eng
dc.title	Exploring EFL Teachers’ Understanding of the Pedagogy of the Multiliteracies.	eng
dc.type.coar	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdcc	eng
dc.type.driver	info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis	eng
dc.type.hasVersion	info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.type.local	Tesis/Trabajo de grado - Monografía - Maestría	spa
dc.type.version	info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.type.version	http://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa