Un juego como estrategia de educación ambiental sobre la biodiversidad de Colombia

dc.contributor.authorSalas López, Gilbertspa
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-02T16:54:28Z
dc.date.available2021-08-02T16:54:28Z
dc.date.issued2018-11-17
dc.description.abstractDebido a que el afecto por la fauna nativa desempeña un papel importante en su conservación y protección, este estudio cuasiexperimental con un diseño pre-/post- evaluó el efecto de un juego educativo sobre la identificación y el afecto por la fauna nativa de Colombia en 291 estudiantes de cuarto a noveno grado de 11 colegios públicos rurales y urbanos de Bogotá y Cundinamarca, quienes respondieron cuestionarios antes y después de 4-5 semanas de juego ad libitum durante el recreo escolar. Al contrastar el prejuego con el posjuego se encontró un aumento significativo en los porcentajes de identificación acer-tada de la fauna no nativa. Cuando se pidió a los estudiantes elegir sus cinco animales favoritos de un álbum, prejuego y posjuego eligieron más animales no nativos que nativos. Respecto a la elección de tres animales para ser salvados, los animales nativos y no nativos pre-/pos-juego fueron los mismos, con dos nativos y tres no nativos. No obstante, el porcentaje de alumnos que eligieron tres animales nativos para salvar tuvo un aumento de dos a cinco veces en el posjuego frente al prejuego. Aunque el resultado fue positivo respecto a la identificación de las especies no nativas, no se observó un cambio significativo en el afecto por los animales nativos, lo cual recalca el desafío y la necesidad de diseñar herramientas de educación ambiental que generen cambios profundos y duraderos en el afecto por la fauna nativa.spa
dc.description.abstractenglishSince the affection for native fauna plays an important role in its conservation and protection, this quasi-experimental study with a pre-/post- design evaluated the effect of an educational game on the identification and affection for the native fauna of Colombia in 291 fourth- to ninth-grade students from 11 rural and urban public schools in Bogotá and Cundinamarca who answered questionnaires before and after 4-5 weeks of ad libitum play during school recess. After contrasting pregame vs. postgame, we found a significant increase in the percentages of successful identification of non-native fauna. When asked to pick their top five favorite animals from an album before and after the game, students chose more non-native than natives animals. As for choosing three animals to be saved, the native and non-native animals before and after the game were the same, two of them native and three non-native. However, the percentage of students who chose three native animals to be saved increased two to five times after the game compared to before the game. Although the result was positive regarding the identification of non-native species, no significant change in the affection for native animals was observed, which emphasizes the challenge and the need to design environmental education tools that generate profound and lasting changes in the affection for native fauna.eng
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.format.mimetypetext/xmlspa
dc.identifierhttps://revistas.upn.edu.co/index.php/TED/article/view/8999
dc.identifier10.17227/ted.num44-8999
dc.identifier.issn2323-0126
dc.identifier.issn2665-3184
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12209/16009
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisherEditorial Universidad Pedagógica Nacionalspa
dc.relationhttps://revistas.upn.edu.co/index.php/TED/article/view/8999/6756
dc.relationhttps://revistas.upn.edu.co/index.php/TED/article/view/8999/7433
dc.relation.referencesAll, A., Nuñez Castellar, P. E., Looy, y J. Van. (2014). Measuring effectiveness in digital game-based learning: A methodological review. International Journal of Serious Ga-mes, 1(2), 3-21. Recuperado de http://doi.org/10.17083/ijsg.v1i2.18eng
dc.relation.referencesBallouard, J. M., Brischoux, F. y Bonnet, X. (2011). Children prioritize virtual exotic biodiversity over local biodiversity. plosone, 6(8), 1-8. doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0023152eng
dc.relation.referencesBalmford, A., Clegg, L., Coulson, T., y Taylor, J. (2002). Why conservationists should heed Pokémon. Science (New York, N.Y.), 295(5564), 2367. doi.org/10.1126/scien-ce.295.5564.2367beng
dc.relation.referencesBednar-Friedl, B., Buijs, A., Dobrovodská, M., Dumortier, M., Eber-hard, K., Fischer, A., ... Young, J. (2009). A long-term biodiversity, ecosystem and awareness research network – results from a (pilot) survey in 8 European countries. Recuperado de https://www.cbd.int/cepa/doc/uk-macaulay-alternet.pdfeng
dc.relation.referencesBevilacqua, M., Ciarapica, F. E., Mazzuto, G. y Paciarotti, C. (2015). “Cook & Teach”: Learning by playing. Journal of Cleaner Production, 106, 259-271. doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.11.085eng
dc.relation.referencesBjerke, T., Østdahl, T., y Kleiven, J. (2003). Attitudes and activities related to ur-ban wildlife: Pet owners and non-owners. Anthrozoos, 16(3), 252-262. doi.org/10.2752/089279303786992125eng
dc.relation.referencesConvention on Biological Diversity. (2013). Quick guides to the Aichi Biodiversity Targets. Recuperado de http://www.cbd.int/nbsap/training/quick-guides/eng
dc.relation.referencesFischer, A., Langers, F., Bednar-Friedl, B., Geamana, N. y Skogen, K. (2011). Mental representations of animal and plant species in their social contexts: Results from a survey across Europe. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 31(2), 118-128. doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.05.005eng
dc.relation.referencesFondo Mundial para la Naturaleza. (2016). Planeta Vivo-Informe 2016-Riesgo y resiliencia en una nueva era. Gland, Suiza. Recuperado de awsassets.panda.org/downloads/informe_planeta_vivo_2016.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesFondo para el Medio Ambiente Mundial. (2009). Esfera de actividad del fmam: Biodiversidad. Washington, DC. Recuperado de https://www.thegef.org/sites/default/files/publications/Biodiversity-ES_2.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesHodges, K. E. (2016). Enhancing student engagement and learning via the optional Biodiversity Challenge. Global Ecology and Conservation, 5, 100-107. doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2015.11.010eng
dc.relation.referencesJohnson, A. (1994). Love of life - The Biophilia Hypothesis edited by Stephen R. Kellert and Edward O. Wilson. Bioscience, 44(5), 363. Recuperado de http://search.proquest.com/docview/216364190?accountid=47900eng
dc.relation.referencesKellert, S. R. (1984). Attitudes toward animals: Age-related development among children. En M. W. Fox y L. D. Mickley (eds.), Advances in Animal Welfare Science, 85, 43-60. Washington, DC. Recuperado de http://animalstudiesrepository.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1001&context=acwp_sataeng
dc.relation.referencesKellert, S. R., y Westervelt, M. O. (1983). Children’s attitudes, knowledge and be-haviors toward animals. Phase V. Fish and Wildlife Service (Dept. of Interior), Washington, DC.eng
dc.relation.referencesMetrick, A. y Weitzman, M. L. (1998). Conflicts and choices in biodiversity preserva-tion. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12(3), 21-34.eng
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.creativecommonsAttribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
dc.sourceTecné, Episteme y Didaxis: TED; Núm. 44 (2018): jul-dicspa
dc.sourceTecné, Episteme y Didaxis: TED; No. 44 (2018): jul-dicspa
dc.sourceTecné, Episteme y Didaxis: TED; n. 44 (2018): jul-dicspa
dc.subjectEducación ambientalspa
dc.subjectBiodiversidadspa
dc.subjectFauna nativaspa
dc.subject.keywordsEnvironmental educationeng
dc.subject.keywordsBiodiversityeng
dc.subject.keywordsNative faunaeng
dc.titleUn juego como estrategia de educación ambiental sobre la biodiversidad de Colombiaspa
dc.title.translatedA game as an environmental education strategy on Colombia’s biodiversity.eng
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501eng
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleeng
dc.type.localArtículo de revistaspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

Archivos