Mejorar el pensamiento crítico para combatir la desinformación : una estrategia educativa con ChatBot.

dc.contributor.advisorLeal Urueña, Linda Alejandraspa
dc.contributor.authorGonzalez Reyes, Marilynspa
dc.coverage.spatialBogotáspa
dc.coverage.temporal2012-2024spa
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-12T16:08:16Z
dc.date.available2025-03-12T16:08:16Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.description.abstractEl pensamiento crítico es una habilidad esencial para la evaluación de información, la resolución de problemas y la toma de decisiones informadas en la era digital. Con el auge de la Inteligencia Artificial (IA), se han generado tanto oportunidades como desafíos para su desarrollo, especialmente en el ámbito educativo. Esta investigación explora cómo la integración de herramientas basadas en IA, como los chatbots generativos, puede potenciar el pensamiento crítico y combatir la desinformación a través de la alfabetización mediática informacional. Para ello, se diseñó un ambiente de aprendizaje virtual en el que estudiantes de secundaria abordaron conceptos clave sobre pensamiento crítico, sesgos cognitivos y verificación de información, interactuando con el chatbot Analizabot. El estudio se desarrolló a través de un diseño cuasiexperimental con tres grupos de estudiantes y utilizó instrumentos como la prueba de pensamiento crítico de Watson y Glaser y el Cuestionario de Competencias Mediáticas para evaluar el impacto de la intervención. Los resultados evidencian diferencias significativas en el desarrollo del pensamiento crítico y en la capacidad para identificar y contrarrestar la desinformación según el tipo de interacción con el chatbot. Además, el análisis cualitativo de las respuestas de los estudiantes permitió identificar patrones en la profundidad de sus argumentos, la frecuencia de justificación y la capacidad analítica. Este estudio aporta evidencia sobre el papel de los chatbots educativos en el fortalecimiento del pensamiento crítico y ofrece recomendaciones para la implementación de estas herramientas en entornos académicos.spa
dc.description.abstractenglishCritical thinking is an essential skill for evaluating information, solving problems, and making informed decisions in the digital age. With the rise of Artificial Intelligence (AI), both opportunities and challenges have emerged for its development, particularly in education. This study explores how integrating AI-based tools, such as generative chatbots, can enhance critical thinking and combat disinformation through media and information literacy. To achieve this, a virtual learning environment was designed where high school students engaged with key concepts such as critical thinking, cognitive biases, and fact-checking while interacting with the Analizabot chatbot. The research was conducted using a quasi-experimental design with three student groups and employed instruments such as the Watson and Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal and the Media Competency Questionnaire to assess the intervention’s impact. The results reveal significant differences in critical thinking development and the ability to identify and counteract disinformation depending on the type of interaction with the chatbot. Additionally, a qualitative analysis of student responses identified patterns in argument depth, justification frequency, and analytical capacity. This study provides evidence of the role of educational chatbots in strengthening critical thinking and offers recommendations for the implementation of these tools in academic settings.spa
dc.description.degreelevelMaestríaspa
dc.description.degreenameMagister en Tecnologías de la Información aplicadas a la Educaciónspa
dc.description.researchareaAmbientes computacionales para el desarrollo del aprendizaje autónomo.spa
dc.formatPDFspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad Pedagógica Nacionalspa
dc.identifier.reponamereponame: Repositorio Institucional UPNspa
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl: http://repositorio.pedagogica.edu.co/
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12209/20911
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisherUniversidad Pedagógica Nacionalspa
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Ciencia y Tecnologíaspa
dc.publisher.programMaestría en Tecnologías de la Información aplicadas a la Educaciónspa
dc.relation.referencesAbrami, P. C., Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Wade, C. A., Surkes, M. A., Tamim, R., & Zhang, D. (2015). Strategies for teaching students to think critically: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 85(2), 275–314. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654314551063spa
dc.relation.referencesAlAfnan, M. A., Dishari, J., Jovic, D., & Lomidze, N. (2023). ChatGPT as an educational tool: Opportunities, challenges, and recommendations for communication, business writing, and composition courses. International Journal of Educational Technology and Learning, 14(2), 15–28. https://ojs.istp-press.com/jait/article/view/184spa
dc.relation.referencesAllcott, H., Gentzkow, M., & Yu, C. (2019). Trends in the diffusion of misinformation on social media. Research & Politics, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168019848554spa
dc.relation.referencesArenas-Fernández, A. (2022). Competencia mediática en estudiantes y profesores colombianos [Tesis doctoral, Universidad de Huelva]. Doctorado Interuniversitario en Comunicación. Recuperado de https://www.doctorado-comunicacion.es/ficheros/doctorandos/arturo_C_284.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesArias-Chávez, D., Ramos-Quispe, T., & Cangalaya Sevillano, L. M. (2024). Análisis y tendencias en el uso de chatbots y agentes conversacionales en el campo de la educación: una revisión bibliométrica. Revista Innovaciones Educativas, 26(41), 242-252. https://doi.org/10.22458/ie.v26i41.5135spa
dc.relation.referencesAtencio-González, R. E., Bonilla-Ron, D. E., Miles-Flores, M. V., & López-Zavala, S. Á. (2023). Chat GPT como recurso para el aprendizaje del pensamiento crítico en estudiantes universitarios. CIENCIAMATRIA: Revista Interdisciplinaria de Humanidades, Educación, Ciencia y Tecnología, 9(17), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.35381/cm.v9i17.1121spa
dc.relation.referencesAusubel, D. P. (1963). The psychology of meaningful verbal learning. Grune & Stratton.spa
dc.relation.referencesAyuso-del Puerto, N., & Gutiérrez-Esteban, P. (2022). La inteligencia artificial como recurso educativo durante la formación inicial del profesorado. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación, 78(1), 51–68. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.25.2.32332spa
dc.relation.referencesBailin, S., & Siegel, H. (2003). Critical thinking. In N. Blake, P. Smeyers, R. Smith, & P. Standish (Eds.), The Blackwell guide to the philosophy of education (pp. 181–193). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470996294.ch11spa
dc.relation.referencesBrown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X018001032spa
dc.relation.referencesBudhwar, P., Chowdhury, S., Wood, G., Aguinis, H., Bamber, G. J., Beltran, J. R., & Varma, A. (2023). Human resource management in the age of genera-tive artificial intelligence: Perspectives and research directions on ChatGPT. Human Resource Management Journal, 33(3), 606-659. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12524spa
dc.relation.referencesBulger, M., & Davison, P. (2018). The promises, challenges, and futures of media literacy. Journal of Media Literacy Education, 10(1), 1–21. https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/jmle/vol10/iss1/1/spa
dc.relation.referencesCampbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Houghton Mifflin.spa
dc.relation.referencesCarr, N. (2010). The shallows: What the internet is doing to our brains. W. W. Norton & Company.spa
dc.relation.referencesCastells, M. (2001). The Internet Galaxy: Reflections on the Internet, Business, and Society. Oxford University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesCastells, M. (2009). Communication power. Oxford University Pressspa
dc.relation.referencesCraik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11(6), 671-684. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(72)80001-Xspa
dc.relation.referencesCubillos–Sánchez, J. (2004). Impacto de una estrategia didáctica sobre habilidades cognitivas del pensamiento crítico. Revista Digital de Educación. https://doi.org/10.61447/20240601/art08spa
dc.relation.referencesDanry, V., Pataranutaporn, P., Mao, Y., & Maes, P. (2023). Don’t just tell me, ask me: AI systems that intelligently frame explanations as questions improve human logical discernment accuracy over causal AI explanations. En Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’23). https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3580672spa
dc.relation.referencesDarwin, D., Rusdin, D., Mukminatien, N., Suryati, N., Laksmi, E. D., & Marzuki. (2024). Critical thinking in the AI era: An exploration of EFL students’ perceptions, benefits, and limitations. Cogent Education, 11(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2290342spa
dc.relation.referencesDeVerna, M. R., Yan, H. Y., Yang, K.-C., & Menczer, F. (2023). Fact-checking information generated by a large language model can decrease news discernment. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.10800spa
dc.relation.referencesDewey, J. (1989). Cómo pensamos. Paidós.spa
dc.relation.referencesDwyer, C. P., Hogan, M. J., & Stewart, I. (2014). An integrated critical thinking framework for the 21st century. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 12, 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2013.12.004.spa
dc.relation.referencesDwyer, C. P., Boswell, A., & Elliott, M. A. (2015). An Evaluation of Critical Thinking Competencies in Business Settings. Journal of Education for Business, 90(5), 260–269. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2015.1038978.spa
dc.relation.referencesEducatics. (n.d.). Los métodos de enseñanza tradicional: Una mirada profunda a la metodología educativa. Recuperado de https://educatics.ar/metodos-de-ensenanza-tradicional/spa
dc.relation.referencesEssel, H. B., Williams, P. O., Koomson, E. S., & Anning-Dorson, T. (2024). ChatGPT effects on cognitive skills of undergraduate students: Receiving instant responses from AI-based conversational large language models (LLMs). Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 5, 100198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100198spa
dc.relation.referencesFacione, P. A. (1990). Critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction. The Delphi Report. American Philosophical Association.spa
dc.relation.referencesFacione, P. A. (2011). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts. Insight Assessment. https://www.insightassessment.comspa
dc.relation.referencesFallis, D. (2014). The varieties of disinformation. In L. Floridi (Ed.), The ethics of information (pp. 135–161). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199645555.001.0001spa
dc.relation.referencesFerrés, J., & Piscitelli, A. (2012). La competencia mediática: Propuesta articulada de dimensiones e indicadores. Comunicar: Revista Científica de Comunicación y Educación, 19(38), 75–82. https://doi.org/10.3916/C38-2012-02-08spa
dc.relation.referencesFlores-Vivar, J. M., Botelho-Francisco, R., & Vargas Marín, D. (2019). Inteligencia Artificial: Cómo los bots pueden contrarrestar las fake news que afectan a las organizaciones de noticias. En XXXI Seminario Internacional AISOC, Madrid. Recuperado de https://www.researchgate.net/publication/337315901_Inteligencia_Artificial_Como_los_bots_pueden_contrarrestar_las_fake_news_que_afectan_a_las_organizaciones_de_noticiasspa
dc.relation.referencesGarcía-Peñalvo, F. J., Llorens-Largo, F., & Vidal, J. (2024). La nueva realidad de la educación ante los avances de la inteligencia artificial generativa. RIED-Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 27(1). https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.27.1.37716spa
dc.relation.referencesGadzella, B. M., Ginther, D. W., & Bryant, G. W. (1997). Prediction of performance in an academic course by scores on measures of learning style and critical thinking. Psychological Reports, 81(2), 595–602. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1997.81.2.595.spa
dc.relation.referencesGardner, J., O’Leary, M., & Li, Y. (2021). Artificial intelligence in educational assessment: ‘breakthrough? Or buncombe and ballyhoo? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(5), 1207–1216. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12577spa
dc.relation.referencesGeorge, D., & Mallery, P. (2010). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference, 17.0 update (10th ed.). Pearson.spa
dc.relation.referencesGillespie, T. (2014). The relevance of algorithms. In T. Gillespie, P. J. Boczkowski, & K. A. Foot (Eds.), Media technologies: Essays on communication, materiality, and society (pp. 167–194). MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262525374.001.0001spa
dc.relation.referencesGonzález, J., & Mendoza, L. (2023). Chatbots en educación: Impacto en la retroalimentación y personalización del aprendizaje. LMI-CAT. https://www.lmi-cat.net/sites/default/files/Chatbots_en_Educacion.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesGuo, Y., & Lee, D. (2023). Leveraging ChatGPT for enhancing critical thinking skills. Education and Information Technologies, 28(6), 4878–4901. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00505spa
dc.relation.referencesHalpern, D. F., & Dunn, D. S. (2021). Critical thinking across the curriculum: A brief edition of thought and knowledge. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315641527spa
dc.relation.referencesHitchcock, D. (2018). Critical thinking. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2018 Edition). Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/critical-thinking/spa
dc.relation.referencesHuitt, W. (1998). Critical thinking: An overview. Educational Psychology Interactive. https://www.edpsycinteractive.org/topics/cognition/critthnk.htmlspa
dc.relation.referencesIfelebuegu, A. O. (2023). Rethinking online assessment strategies: Authenticity versus AI chatbot intervention. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 26(4), 94–110. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.2.2spa
dc.relation.referencesKasneci, E., Seßler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., & Günnemann, S. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274spa
dc.relation.referencesKooli, C. (2023). Chatbots in education and research: A critical examination of ethical implications and solutions. Sustainability, 15(7), 5614–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15075614spa
dc.relation.referencesLai, E. R. (2011). Critical thinking: A literature review. Pearson’s Research Reports. https://images.pearsonassessments.com/images/tmrs/CriticalThinkingReviewFINAL.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesLi, Y., Wang, Z., & Papatheodorou, T. (2024). Staying vigilant in the Age of AI: From content generation to content authentication. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.00922spa
dc.relation.referencesLinvill, D. L., & Warren, P. L. (2020). Troll factories: Manufacturing specialized disinformation on Twitter. Political Communication, 37(4), 447–467. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2020.1718257spa
dc.relation.referencesLipman, M. (1987). Critical thinking: What can it be? Educational Leadership, 46(1), 38–43. https://files.ascd.org/staticfiles/ascd/pdf/journals/ed_lead/el_198809_lipman.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesLiu, C., Hou, J., Tu, Y. F., Wang, Y., & Hwang, G. J. (2021). Incorporating a reflective thinking promoting mechanism into artificial intelligence-supported English writing environments. Interactive Learning Environments, 1(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.2012812spa
dc.relation.referencesMarcos-Vílchez, J. M., Sánchez-Martín, M., & Muñiz-Velázquez, J. A. (2024). Effectiveness of training actions aimed at improving critical thinking in the face of disinformation: A systematic review protocol. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 51, 101474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101474spa
dc.relation.referencesMcDougall, J. (2019). Media literacy versus fake news: Critical thinking, resilience and civic engagement. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23491-4spa
dc.relation.referencesMcIntyre, L. (2018). Post-truth. MIT Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesMontoya, M. (2019). La era de la posverdad, la posveracidad y la charlatanería. +1 Sumando historias. Recuperado de https://www.unav.edu/web/ciencia-razon-y-fe/la-era-de-la-posverdad-la-posveracidad-y-la-charlataneriaspa
dc.relation.referencesMosqueda Chávez, E. (2024). La inteligencia artificial como aliada del aprendizaje y el pensamiento crítico. Revista Mexicana de Bachillerato a Distancia, 32(16).spa
dc.relation.referencesMosqueda Chávez, R. (2024). Desarrollo del pensamiento crítico con simulaciones interactivas. Revista de Educación Crítica, 15(1), 17–23. https://doi.org/10.22201/cuaieed.20074751e.2024.32.89555spa
dc.relation.referencesMaldonado, C. E. (2023). ¿Qué significa el pensamiento crítico en la era de la inteligencia artificial? Le Monde Diplomatique. Recuperado de https://www.researchgate.net/publication/370580088_Que_significa_el_pensamiento_critico_en_la_era_de_la_inteligencia_artificialspa
dc.relation.referencesNaffi, N., Charest, M., Danis, S., Pique, L., Davidson, A. L., Brault, N., … Barma, S. (2023). Empowering Youth to Combat Malicious Deepfakes and Disinformation: An Experiential and Reflective Learning Experience Informed by Personal Construct Theory. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 38(1), 119–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10720537.2023.2294314spa
dc.relation.referencesOCDE. (2021). Education at a Glance 2021: OECD Indicators. OCDE Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/b35a14e5-enspa
dc.relation.referencesOCDE. (2024). Hechos frente a falsedades: Combatir la desinformación y fortalecer la integridad de la información. OCDE Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/es/publications/reports/2024/03/facts-not-fakes-tackling-disinformation-strengthening-information-integrity_ff96d19f/06f8ca41-es.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesOrganización de las Naciones Unidas (ONU). (2023). Contrarrestar la desinformación para proteger los derechos humanos y las libertades fundamentales. https://www.un.org/es/countering-disinformationspa
dc.relation.referencesPaul, R., & Elder, L. (2008). The miniature guide to critical thinking concepts and tools (5th ed.). Foundation for Critical Thinking Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesPark, J. A., & Kim, B. J. (2009). Critical Thinking Disposition and Clinical Competence in General Hospital Nurses. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 39(6). https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2009.39.6.840.spa
dc.relation.referencesPark, S., Subramonyam, H., & Kulkarni, C. (2023). Thinking assistants: LLM-based conversational assistants that help users think by asking rather than answering. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.06024. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2312.06024spa
dc.relation.referencesPiaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children (M. Cook, Trans.). International Universities Press. (Trabajo original publicado en 1936)spa
dc.relation.referencesQuattrociocchi, W., Scala, A., & Sunstein, C. R. (2016). The role of information in political polarization: Evidence from social media. Science Advances, 2(7), e1600516. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1600516spa
dc.relation.referencesQuinn, S., Hogan, M., Dwyer, C., Finn, P., & Fogarty, E. (2020). Development and validation of the Student-Educator Negotiated Critical Thinking Dispositions Scale (SENCTDS). Thinking Skills and Creativity, 38, 100710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100710spa
dc.relation.referencesRahman, M., & Watanobe, Y. (2023). ChatGPT for education and research: Opportunities, threats, and strategies. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 33(3), 1–19.spa
dc.relation.referencesRusandi, M. A., Ahman, I., Saripah, I., Khairun, D. Y., & Mutmainnah. (2023). No worries with ChatGPT: Building bridges between artificial intelligence and education with critical thinking soft skills. Journal of Public Health, 45(3), e602–e603. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdad049spa
dc.relation.referencesShanta, S., & Wells, J. G. (2022). T/E design-based learning: Assessing student critical thinking and problem-solving abilities. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 32(1), 267–285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-020-09608-8spa
dc.relation.referencesŠlapeta, J. (2023). ¿Are ChatGPT and other pretrained language models Good parasitologists? Trends in parasitology, 39(5), 314-316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pt.2023.02.006spa
dc.relation.referencesStatista. (2024). Porcentaje de la población expuesta frecuentemente a noticias falsas en la Unión Europea y Latinoamérica. https://es.statista.comspa
dc.relation.referencesStupnisky, R. H., Renaud, R. D., Daniels, L. M., Haynes, T. L., & Perry, R. P. (2008). The interrelation of first-year college students’ critical thinking disposition, perceived academic control, and academic achievement. Research in Higher Education, 49(6), 513–530. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-008-9093-8.spa
dc.relation.referencesTabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Pearson Education.spa
dc.relation.referencesTang, K. S., Cooper, G., Rappa, N., Cooper, M., Sims, C., & Nonis, K. (2024). A dialogic approach to transform teaching, learning & assessment with generative AI in secondary education: a proof of concept. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 19(3), 493–503. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554480X.2024.2379774spa
dc.relation.referencesTandoc, E. C., Lim, Z. W., & Ling, R. (2018). Defining “fake news”: A typology of scholarly definitions. Digital Journalism, 6(2), 137–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2017.1360143spa
dc.relation.referencesThornhill-Miller, B., Camarda, A., Mercier, M., Burkhardt, J. M., Morisseau, T., Bourgeois-Bougrine, S., Vinchon, F., El Hayek, S., Augereau-Landais, M., Mourey, F., Feybesse, C., Sundquist, D., & Lubart, T. (2024). Creativity, critical thinking, communication, and collaboration: Assessment, certification, and promotion of 21st century skills for the future of work and education. J. Intell, 11(54), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11030054spa
dc.relation.referencesToffler, A. (1980). The third wave. Bantam Books.spa
dc.relation.referencesUNESCO. (2017). Educating for sustainable development goals: Learning objectives. Recuperado de https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000247444spa
dc.relation.referencesUNESCO. (2018). Media and information literacy: Curriculum for educators and learners. Recuperado de https://unesdoc.unesco.org/spa
dc.relation.referencesUNESCO. (2023). Desinformación en línea: Regulación de redes sociales y transparencia de algoritmos. https://www.unesco.org/es/articles/desinformacion-en-linea-la-unesco-presenta-su-plan-de-accion-para-regular-las-redes-socialesspa
dc.relation.referencesUNESCO. (2023). Participa en nuestra encuesta mundial sobre la evolución de la alfabetización mediática e informacional. https://www.unesco.org/es/articles/participa-nuestra-encuesta-mundial-sobre-la-evolucion-de-la-alfabetizacion-mediatica-e-informacionalspa
dc.relation.referencesvan den Berg, G., & du Plessis, E. (2023). ChatGPT and generative AI: Possibilities for its contribution to lesson planning, critical thinking and openness in teacher education. Education Sciences, 13(998), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13100998spa
dc.relation.referencesVargas-Murillo, D., Pari-Bedoya, J. A., & Guevara-Soto, C. (2023). Challenges and opportunities of AI-assisted learning: A systematic literature review on the impact of ChatGPT usage in higher education. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 22(3), 45–62. https://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter/article/view/7921/pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesVygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds. & Trans.). Harvard University Press. (Trabajo original publicado en 1930-1934)spa
dc.relation.referencesWardle, C., & Derakhshan, H. (2017). Information disorder: Toward an interdisciplinary framework for research and policy making. Council of Europe. Recuperado de https://rm.coe.int/information-disorder-report/1680764666spa
dc.relation.referencesWatson, G., & Glaser, E. M. (1980). Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal Manual. The Psychological Corporation.spa
dc.relation.referencesXiao, X., Su, Y., & Lee, D. K. L. (2021). Who consumes new media content more wisely? Examining personality factors, SNS use, and new media literacy in the era of misinformation. Social Media + Society, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305121990200spa
dc.relation.referencesZhu, G., Fan, X., Hou, C., Zhong, T., Seow, P., Chen, A. S.-H., Rajalingam, P., Low, K. Y., & Tan, L. P. (2024). Embrace opportunities and face challenges: Using ChatGPT in undergraduate students’ collaborative interdisciplinary learning [Manuscrito inédito]. National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2305.18616spa
dc.rights.accessAcceso abiertospa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.creativecommonsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectPensamiento críticospa
dc.subjectDesinformaciónspa
dc.subjectAlfabetización mediática informacionalspa
dc.subjectInteligencia artificialspa
dc.subjectChatbot educativosspa
dc.subject.keywordsMedia and information literacyeng
dc.subject.keywordsDisinformationeng
dc.subject.keywordsArtificial intelligenceeng
dc.subject.keywordsCritical thinkingeng
dc.subject.keywordsEducational chatboteng
dc.titleMejorar el pensamiento crítico para combatir la desinformación : una estrategia educativa con ChatBot.spa
dc.title.translatedEnhancing Critical Thinking to Combat Disinformation: An Educational Strategy with a ChatBotspa
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisspa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdcceng
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.type.localTesis/Trabajo de grado - Monografía - Maestríaspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.type.versionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
Mejorar el pensamiento crítico para combatir la desinformación.pdf
Tamaño:
4.05 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 2 de 2
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
1.71 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción:
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
202503650034153- 04 MAR 25 MARILYN GONZALEZ.pdf
Tamaño:
166.78 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
licencia aprobada