Entendimiento del concepto mol logrado por los estudiantes en un curso de química general de corte constructivista.

dc.contributor.authorUtria Echeverría, Carlosspa
dc.contributor.authorFigueroa Molina, Robertospa
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-02T16:53:08Z
dc.date.available2021-08-02T16:53:08Z
dc.date.issued2003-05-11
dc.description.abstractEl propósito de esta investigación fue estudiar el entendimiento conceptual logrado en un curso de Química General (“Quím 3001”), con enfoque constructivista. Un grupo de 28 estudiantes participó en un estudio de medidas repetidas obtenidas, a través de mapas conceptuales acerca del concepto mol elaborados en tres tiempos durante el curso: 1) antes de estudiar el concepto; 2) inmediatamente luego de que se estudiara; y 3) luego de estudiar otros conceptos relacionados. El análisis de medidas repetidas, indicó que existían diferencias significativas entre todos los tres tiempos, especialmente los primeros dos. Se evidenció, por tanto, que el curso de Química General con enfoque constructivista, contribuyó significativamente a promover el desarrollo del entendimiento del concepto mol en los estudiantes. Algunas recomendaciones ofrecidas fueron: desarrollar e implantar métodos de enseñanza que promuevan el entendimiento de conceptos científicos, capacitar a los profesores de ciencias naturales con el propósito de que enfoquen su instrucción al entendimiento de los conceptos, entre otras.spa
dc.description.abstractenglishThis work intends to discuss the conceptual understanding of a general chernistry course (chemistry 3001), with a constructivist approach. A group of 28 students participated in an analysis of a series of repeated measurement obtained through the elaboration of conceptual maps about the concept of mole they handle within three intances: a) before studying the isue; b) inmediatilly after studying it; and c) after studying other related concepts, 8 of those students were interviewed to make then escribe their conceptual maps. The analysis of the repeated measures indicated that significatives differences existed arnong all the three instances. This proved that a course with a constructivist approach significantly contributed to promote the development of the conceptual understanding of the mole concept among the students. Some of the recommendations consisted in developing and implementing a consistent teachíng methods that promote a stronger understandíng of scientific concepts among studens, and to accomplish a better training of teachers of natural science to make them teach toward a better conceptual understanding among others.eng
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.identifierhttps://revistas.upn.edu.co/index.php/TED/article/view/5578
dc.identifier10.17227/ted.num13-5578
dc.identifier.issn2323-0126
dc.identifier.issn2665-3184
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12209/15608
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisherEditorial Universidad Pedagógica Nacionalspa
dc.relationhttps://revistas.upn.edu.co/index.php/TED/article/view/5578/4595
dc.relation.referencesAguirre, M. (1989) Open-ended questions: An alternative mode to assess the students’ performance in concepto development and use of scientific vocabulaiy. Unpublished dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo, p. 12.eng
dc.relation.referencesAmerican Association for the Advancement of Science., (2001) Science for All Americans: Project. Washington, D.Cp. pp.19-22.eng
dc.relation.referencesAnamuah - Mensah, J., (1986) Cognitive Strategies Used by chemistry students to solve volumetric analysis problems. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 23 [9], 1986, pp. 759-769.eng
dc.relation.referencesArce, J., (1997) Student-designed experiments in scientific lab instruction. Journal of College Teaching, 1997, pp. 114-118.eng
dc.relation.referencesAusubel, D., (1968) Educational Psychology: A cognitive view. New York: Holt. RINEHART, & WINSTON, Bunce, D., Gabel, D., & Samuel, K., (1991) Enchancing chemistry problern-solving achievment using problern categorization. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28 [6], pp. 505-521.eng
dc.relation.referencesBunce, D.; Gabel, D. & Samuel 1<. Enchancing chemistry problem-solving achievment using problem categorizafien. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28 [6], 1991, pp. 505-521.eng
dc.relation.referencesCros, D.; Chastrette, M. & Fayol, M. (1988) Conceptions of second year university students of some fundamental notions of chemistry. International Journal of Science Education, 10 [3], 1988, pp. 331- 336.eng
dc.relation.referencesFreedrnan, M. (1997) Relationship among laboratory instruction, attitude toward science, and achievement in science knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, [4], 1997, pp. 343-357.eng
dc.relation.referencesGabel, (1993) D. Use of the particle nature of matter in developing conceptual understanding. Journal of Chemical Education, 70, [3], 1993, pp. 193-194.eng
dc.relation.referencesGabel, D.; Sherwood, R. & Enochs, L. (1991) Problem-solving skills of high school chemistry students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 21, [2], 1991, pp. 221 -233.eng
dc.relation.referencesNakhleh, M. (1994) How can research uncover what students are learning? Journal of Chemical Education, 71 [3], 1994, pp. 201-203.eng
dc.relation.referencesNakhleh, M. (1992.) Why some students don’t learn chemistry: Chemical misconceptions. Journal of Chemical Educations, 69 [3], 1992, pp. 191-196.eng
dc.relation.referencesNovak, J. (1994) Application of advances in learning theory and philosophy of science to the improvement of chemistry teaching. Journal of Chemical Education, 61 [7], 1984, pp. 607-612.eng
dc.relation.referencesNovick, S. & Nussbaum, J. (1978) Junior high school pupils understanding of the particulate nature of matter: An interview Study. Science Education, 62 [3], 1978, pp. 273-281.eng
dc.relation.referencesNurrenbern, S. & Pickering, M. (1987). Concept learning versus problem solving: is there a difference? Journal of Chemical Education, 64 [6], 1987, pp. 508-510.eng
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.creativecommonsAttribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
dc.sourceTecné, Episteme y Didaxis: TED; Núm. 13 (2003)spa
dc.sourceTecné, Episteme y Didaxis: TED; No. 13 (2003)spa
dc.sourceTecné, Episteme y Didaxis: TED; n. 13 (2003)spa
dc.subjectEntendimiento conceptualspa
dc.subjectQuímica generalspa
dc.subjectMolspa
dc.subjectConstructivismospa
dc.subjectMapas conceptualesspa
dc.subject.keywordsConceptual understandingeng
dc.subject.keywordsGeneral chemistryeng
dc.subject.keywordsMoleeng
dc.subject.keywordsConstructivisteng
dc.subject.keywordsConceptual mapseng
dc.titleEntendimiento del concepto mol logrado por los estudiantes en un curso de química general de corte constructivista.spa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501eng
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleeng
dc.type.localArtículo de revistaspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

Archivos