Communication through blog posts within the multiliteracies approach.

dc.contributor.advisorMellizo Guaqueta, Nelsonspa
dc.contributor.authorSuárez Bedoya, Yuly Paolaspa
dc.coverage.spatialBogotáspa
dc.coverage.temporal2019 - 2020spa
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-05T01:56:00Z
dc.date.available2020-08-05T01:56:00Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractEste trabajo de grado fue realizado con estudiantes de grado cuarto quienes tenían baja producción escrita en inglés y uso limitado de la lengua extranjera para interactuar. Por tal motivo se propone implementar un blog con el objetivo de describir de qué manera este fomenta la comunicación y mejora las habilidades con el idioma y de escritura de los estudiantes. Para ello se utiliza el enfoque de multiliteracidades, el cual permite crear significados de múltiples formas teniendo en cuenta las herramientas multimedia y los patrones de experiencia de los estudiantes. La experiencia juega un papel importante ya que les proporciona a los estudiantes una cercanía con su realidad para escribir sobre temas que conocen y motivación para usar el idioma en situaciones comunicativas.spa
dc.description.degreelevelTesis de pregradospa
dc.description.degreenameLicenciado en Español e Inglésspa
dc.description.sponsorshipUniversidad Pedagógica Nacionalspa
dc.formatPDFspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad Pedagógica Nacionalspa
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad Pedagógica Nacionalspa
dc.identifier.reponamereponame: Repositorio Institucional UPNspa
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl: http://repositorio.pedagogica.edu.co/
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12209/12094
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisherUniversidad Pedagógica Nacionalspa
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Humanidadesspa
dc.publisher.programLicenciatura en Español e Inglésspa
dc.relation.referencesArfé, B., Dockrell, J. E., & De Bernardi, B. (2016). The effect of language specific factors on early written composition: The role of spelling, oral language and text generation skills in a shallow orthography. Reading and Writing, 29(3), 501–527.
dc.relation.referencesBrown, D. (2007). Principles of language learning and teaching. New York: Pearson English.
dc.relation.referencesBurns, A. (2010). Doing Action Research in English Language Teaching. A Guide for Practitioners. New York Routledge.
dc.relation.referencesByrne, D. (1988). Teaching Writing Skills. Essex: Longman Group UK Limited.
dc.relation.referencesColegio Villemar el Carmen. (2018). Proyecto Educativo Institucional. Bogotá.
dc.relation.referencesCope, B. & Kalantzis, M. (2000). Multiliteracies: literacy learning and the design of social futures. London: Routledge.
dc.relation.referencesCope, B. & Kalantzis, M. (2005). Learning by Design. Common Ground.
dc.relation.referencesCope, B. & Kalantzis, M. (2009). Multiliteracies: New literacies, new learning pedagogies. An International Journal.164 -195.
dc.relation.referencesCreswell, J. (2014). Designing Research. Qualitative. Quantitative and mixed method approaches. SAGE Publications, Inc.
dc.relation.referencesDanzak, R. L. (2011). Defining identities through multiliteracies: EL teens narrate their immigration experiences as graphic stories. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 55(3), 187-196.
dc.relation.referencesDombey, H. (2013). What we know about teaching writing. Preschool & Primary Education, Vol 1, Issue 1, 22-40.
dc.relation.referencesDurga, S & Rao, C. (2018). Developing students' writing skills in English - A process approach. Journal for Research Scholars and Professionals of English Language Teaching. Vol. 2.
dc.relation.referencesFageeh, A. (2011). EFL learners' use of blogging for developing writing skills and enhancing attitudes towards English learning: An exploratory study. Journal of Language and Literature, Vol. 2. No. 1.
dc.relation.referencesGiven, L. M. (2008). The SAGE Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods. SAGE publications, INC. USA.
dc.relation.referencesGlasow, P. (2005). Fundamentals of Survey Research Methodology. Washington C3 Centre. McLean, Virginia.
dc.relation.referencesGracia, D. (2007). Mass Media in Writing Expression. Universidad Pedagógica Nacional. Tesis de pregrado.
dc.relation.referencesHalliday, M. (2007). Language and education. London: Biddies Ltd.
dc.relation.referencesHarris, P. (2004). Writing in the Primary School Years. Cengage Learning Australia.
dc.relation.referencesHymes, D. (1972). On Communicative Competence. In: J.B. Pride and J. Holmes (eds) Sociolinguistics. Selected Readings. Harmondsworth: Penguin, pp. 269-293.(Part 1)
dc.relation.referencesJackson, R., Drummond, D., & Camara, S. (2007). What Is Qualitative Research? Qualitative Research Reports in Communication, 8(1), 21–28.
dc.relation.referencesJohnson, M. (1999). Communication in the classroom. U.S. Department of Education.
dc.relation.referencesKalivoda, T. (1976). Communication in the foreign language classroom. Hispania. Vol. 59. No. 2, 294-301.
dc.relation.referencesKolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Englewood Cliffs, N.J. Prentice Hall.
dc.relation.referencesKumar, D. (2014). Effectiveness of guided writing in teaching composition. Journal of NELTA Surkhet, Vol. 4, 18-25.
dc.relation.referencesLamprea, A. (2011). The implementation of a social network to foster students’ writing skills in the EFL classroom. Universidad Pedagógica Nacional. Tesis de pregrado.
dc.relation.referencesLunenburg, F. (2010). Communication: The process, barriers, and improving effectiveness. Schooling, Vol. 1, No. 1, 1-11.
dc.relation.referencesMateo, N. (2016). Teaching writing in the primary school. Encuentro, 25, 25-61.
dc.relation.referencesMcKay, S. (1979). Communicative writing. TESOL Quarterly, Vol. 13, No. 1, 73-80.
dc.relation.referencesMiller, J. (2009). Process Writing. Editorial Macmillan.
dc.relation.referencesMinisterio de Educación Nacional (1998). Lineamientos Curriculares de Idiomas Extranjeros. Bogotá.
dc.relation.referencesMinisterio de Educación Nacional. (2006). Estándares Básicos de Competencias en Lenguas Extranjeras: Inglés. Bogotá.
dc.relation.referencesMinisterio de Educación Nacional. (2016). Derechos Básicos de Aprendizaje: inglés, transición a quinto. Bogotá.
dc.relation.referencesMyhill, D., Lines, H. and Watson, A. (2011) Making meaning with grammar: a repertoire of possibilities. Metaphor, Issue 2.
dc.relation.referencesNation, I. (2009). Teaching ESL/EFL Reading and Writing. New York: Routledge.
dc.relation.referencesNavarro, D. (2006). The use of guided composition through topics in order to help students develop their writing skills. InterSedes: Revista de las Sedes Regionales, Vol. 7, No. 12, 77-89.
dc.relation.referencesNavehebrahim, M. (2011). Multiliteracies approach to empower learning and teaching engagement. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences No. 29 863 – 868.
dc.relation.referencesNoytim, U. (2010). Weblogs enhancing EFL students’ English language learning. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 2, 1127–1132.
dc.relation.referencesNunan, D. (1989). Designing tasks for the communicative classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.relation.referencesParada, R. & Quentín, E. (2010). Fostering reading and writing skills in EFL classrooms through a social network site. Universidad Pedagógica Nacional. Tesis de pregrado.
dc.relation.referencesPhillips, D. K. & Carr, K. (2010). Becoming a teacher through action research: process, context, and self-study. New York, USA: Taylor & Francis.
dc.relation.referencesPinkman, K. (2005). Using weblogs in the foreign language classroom: Encouraging learner independence. The Jalt Call Journal, Vol. 1, 12-24.
dc.relation.referencesPuschmann, C. (2013). Blogging. Pragmatics of Computer-Mediated Communication. 83 - 108.
dc.relation.referencesRajendram, S. (2015). Potentials and challenges of the multiliteracies pedagogy in teaching English language learners. Critical Intersections in Education, Vol. 3, 1-18.
dc.relation.referencesRichards, J. (2006). Communicative language teaching today. New York: Cambridge University Press.
dc.relation.referencesRodríguez, M. & Rodríguez J. (2010). Task-based language learning: Old approach, new style. A new lesson to learn. Profile Vol. 12, No. 2, 165-178.
dc.relation.referencesRogers, A. (2008). Using technology to facilitate process writing and interaction among adult students. Profile, Vol 9, 197-218.
dc.relation.referencesRojas, G. (2011). Writing using blogs: A way to engage Colombian adolescents in meaningful communication. Profile, Vol. 13, No. 2, 11-27.
dc.relation.referencesSchmerbeck, N. & Lucht, F. (2017). Creating meaning through multimodality: Multiliteracies assessment and photo projects for online portfolios. Die Unterrichtspraxis/Teaching German.
dc.relation.referencesSuleiman, M. (2000). The process and product of writing: Implications for elementary school teachers. Association for Bilingual Education Conference.
dc.relation.referencesThurmond, V. (2001). The Point of Triangulation. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 33(3), 253-258.
dc.relation.referencesTudor, I. (2001). Visions of learning in the dynamics of the language classroom. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
dc.relation.referencesValdés, G., Haro, P., & Echevarriarza, M. (1992). The development of writing abilities in a foreign language: Contributions toward a general theory of L2 writing. The Modern Language Journal. Vol. 76, No. 3, 333-352.
dc.relation.referencesVelentzas, J. & Broni, G. (2015). Communication cycle: Definition, process, models and examples. Recent Advances in Financial Planning and Product Development.
dc.relation.referencesVera, E., Chapetón, C. & Buitrago, Z. (2018) An Informed and Reflective Approach to Language Teaching and Material Design. Bogotá: Universidad Pedagógica Nacional.
dc.relation.referencesWiddoson, H. (1978). Teaching English as Communication. New York: Oxford University Press.
dc.relation.referencesWillis, J. (1996). A Framework for Task-based Learning. Essex: Longman.
dc.relation.referencesXin, Z. (2007). Reflective thinking on communicative teaching in writing. US-China Education Review, Vol. 4, No.5, 19-25.
dc.relation.referencesZamel, V. (1982). Writing: The process of discovering meaning. TESOL Quarterly, Vol. 16, No. 2, 195-209.
dc.rights.accessAcceso abiertospa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.creativecommonsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.sourcereponame:Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Pedagógica Nacionalspa
dc.sourceinstname:Universidad Pedagógica Nacionalspa
dc.subjectComunicaciónspa
dc.subjectHabilidades de escrituraspa
dc.subjectEnfoque de multiliteracidadesspa
dc.subjectBlogspa
dc.subject.keywordsCommunicationeng
dc.subject.keywordsWriting skillseng
dc.subject.keywordsMultiliteracies approacheng
dc.subject.keywordsBlogeng
dc.titleCommunication through blog posts within the multiliteracies approach.eng
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1feng
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesiseng
dc.type.localTesis/Trabajo de grado - Monografía – Pregradospa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.type.versionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
SUAREZ YULY_TRABAJO DE GRADO_INGLES.pdf
Tamaño:
2.75 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Trabajo de grado

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 2 de 2
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
1.71 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción:
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
Licencia de uso Yuli.pdf
Tamaño:
178.82 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción: