Ambiente virtual con software motivacional y su efecto en el logro de aprendizaje, el monitoreo del aprendizaje, la gestión del tiempo y el estilo cognitivo en la Dimensión DIC.

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.advisorLópez Vargas, Omarspa
dc.contributor.authorDuque Villalba, William Augustospa
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-23T15:14:52Z
dc.date.available2021-05-23T15:14:52Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractTesis de Maestría en Tecnologías de la Información Aplicadas a la Educación, a través de la cual se estudia el efecto que produce la incorporación de andamios de monitoreo a un software motivacional con diseño emocional, sobre el logro de aprendizaje, en el monitoreo del proceso de aprendizaje y en la gestión del tiempo en estudiantes con diferente estilo cognitivo DIC. En la investigación, que se llevó a cabo en la Institución Educativa Distrital Pablo Neruda, ubicada en Bogotá, participaron 211 estudiantes de grado décimo. En este estudio se realizaron mediciones a seis grupos, antes y después de la intervención cuasi-experimental, la cual consistió en el desarrollo de 11 unidades didácticas pertenecientes a la asignatura filosofía, implementadas en un ambiente virtual de aprendizaje. Los resultados de esta investigación resaltan la importancia del uso de andamios de monitoreo en el proceso de aprendizaje y desprecia la incidencia del software motivacional con diseño emocional.spa
dc.description.degreelevelMaestríaspa
dc.description.degreenameMagister en Tecnologías de la Información aplicadas a la Educaciónspa
dc.formatPDFspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad Pedagógica Nacionalspa
dc.identifier.reponamereponame: Repositorio Institucional UPNspa
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl: http://repositorio.pedagogica.edu.co/
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12209/13280
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisherUniversidad Pedagógica Nacionalspa
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Ciencia y Tecnologíaspa
dc.publisher.programMaestría en Tecnologías de la Información aplicadas a la Educaciónspa
dc.relation.referencesAbdulkader, F. & Elissa, M. (2015). The effectiveness of Time Management Strategies Instruction on students' academic time management and academic self efficacy. International Journal of Psycho-Educational Sciences, Vol(4), 43-50. DOI: 10.19816/0023057.
dc.relation.referencesAlomyan, H. (2004). Individual Differences: Implications for Web-Based Learning Design. International Education Journal, 4(4), 188-196.
dc.relation.referencesAngeli C., Valanides N., Polemitou E. & Fraggoulidou E. (2016). An interaction effect between young children's field dependence-independence and order of learning with glass-box and black-box simulations: Evidence for the malleability of cognitive style in computer-supported learning.
dc.relation.referencesArgüelles, D. (2010). Estrategias para promover procesos de aprendizaje autónomo. Bogotá. Universidad EAN. 2010. Revista Escuela de Administración de Negocios, (69), 209-211. Recuperado a partir de https://journal.universidadean.edu.co/index.php/Revista/article/view/528Computers in Human Behavior, 61, 569-583, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.060
dc.relation.referencesAzevedo, R., & Hadwin, A. F. (2005). Scaffolding self-regulated learning and metacognition - Implications for the design of computer-based scaffolds. Instructional Science, 33(5–6), 367–379. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-005-1272-9
dc.relation.referencesAzevedo, R. y Cromley, JG (2004). ¿La formación en auto-aprendizaje facilita el aprendizaje de los estudiantes con hipermedia? Revista de psicología educativa, 96 (3), 523.
dc.relation.referencesBarnard-Brak, L., Lan, W. Y., & Paton, V. O. (2011). Measuring and profiling self-regulated learning in the online environment. In Fostering self-regulated learning through ICT (pp. 27-38). IGI Global.
dc.relation.referencesBarnard, L., Lan, W. Y., To, Y. M., Paton, V. O., & Lai, S. L. (2009). Measuring self-regulation in online and blended learning environments. The internet and higher education, 12(1), 1-6.
dc.relation.referencesBarrera de la, M. L., Donolo, D., & Rinaudo, M. C. (2008). Ritmo de estudio y trayectoria universitaria. Anales de Psicología, 24(1), 9-15.
dc.relation.referencesBlummer, B., & Kenton, J. (2015). Improving student information search. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
dc.relation.referencesBrand, S., Reimer, T., & Opwis, K. (2007). How do we learn in a negative mood? Effects of a negative mood on transfer and learning. Learning and Instruction, 17(1), 1e16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.11.002.
dc.relation.referencesBradley, M. M., Codispoti, M., Sabatinelli, D., & Lang, P. J. (2001). Emotion and motivation II: sex differences in picture processing. Emotion, 1, 300e319. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.1.3.300.
dc.relation.referencesBritton, B. K., & Tesser, A. (1991). Effects of time management and practices on college grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 405–410.
dc.relation.referencesBrown, A. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other more mysterious mechanisms. En F.E. Weinert & R. H. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation, and understanding, (pp. 65-116). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
dc.relation.referencesBrush, T. A., & Saye, J. W. (2002). A Summary of Research Exploring Hard and Soft Scaffolding for Teachers and Students Using a Multimedia Supported Learning Environment. The Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 1(2), 1–12. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download;jsessionid= 5CE99D40B28EC28D6FA74395011AA7C7?doi=10.1.1.211.7691&rep=rep1&type=pdf
dc.relation.referencesBrünken, R., Plass, J. L., & Moreno, R. (Eds.). (2010). Current issues and open questions in cognitive load research. In J. L. Plass, R. Moreno, & R. Brünken (Eds.), Cognitive load theory (p. 253–272). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511844744.014
dc.relation.referencesBurlison, J., Murphy, C., & Dwyer, W. (2009). Evaluation of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire for predicting academic performance in college students of varying scholastic aptitude. College Student Journal, 43, 1313–1323.
dc.relation.referencesBurón, O. J. (1993). Enseñar a aprender: Introducción a la metacognición (6a ed.). Bilbao: Mensajero.
dc.relation.referencesBurt, C. D. B., & Kemp, S. (1994). Construction of activity duration and time management potential. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 8, 155–168.
dc.relation.referencesCaicedo, T. A. (2011). Planificación y monitoreo en la comprensión lectora. Algunas variables asociadas al uso de estrategias metacognitivas (Tesis de maestría). Universidad del Valle, Santiago de Cali.
dc.relation.referencesCampione, J., Brown, A., Ferrara, R. & Bryant, N. (1984). The zone of proximal development: Implications for individual differences in learning. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, Vol(23), 77-91. DOI: 10.1002/cd.23219842308
dc.relation.referencesCao, L. & Cao, X. (2004). The influence of time management disposition, cognitive style, and meta-worry on the high school students' achievement. Chin. J. Ergon. 10, 13–15.
dc.relation.referencesCarr, S. C., & Punzo, R. P. (1993). The effects of self-monitoring of academic accuracy and productivity on the performance of students with behavior disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 18, 241-250.
dc.relation.referencesCharoenpit, S., & Ohkura, M. (2013). A New E-learning System Focusing on Emotional Aspect Using Biological Signals. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 343–350. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-39262-7_39
dc.relation.referencesChen, C. H., & Ge, X. (2006). The design of a web-based cognitive modeling system to suppor till-structured problem solving. British Journal of Educational Technology, 37(2), 299-302. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2005.00480.x
dc.relation.referencesChen, S., & Macredie, R. (2002). Cognitive styles and hypermedia navigation: development of a learning model. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(1), 3-15.
dc.relation.referencesChi, Leeuw, & LaVancher, C. (1994). Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding. Cognitive Science, 18(3), 439-477.
dc.relation.referencesChoi, J. N., & Moran, S. V. (2009). Why not procrastinate? Development and validation of a new active procrastination scale. The Journal of Social Psychology, 149, 195–211.
dc.relation.referencesClaessens, B. C., van Eerde, W., Rutte, C. G., & Roe, R. A. (2007). A review of the time management literature. Personnel Review, 36, 255–276.
dc.relation.referencesDe Bruin, A. B., & van Gog, T. (2012). Improving self-monitoring and self-regulation: From cognitive psychology to the classroom.
dc.relation.referencesDelmastro, A. & Salazar, L. (2008). El andamiaje instruccional como activador de procesos metacognitivos durante el aprendizaje de lenguas extranjeras. Entre lenguas, 13, 43-56.
dc.relation.referencesDettmers, S., Trautwein, U., & Ludtke, O. (2009). The relationship between homework time and achievement is not universal: evidence from multilevel analyses in 40 countries. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 20, 375-405.
dc.relation.referencesDíaz, J. (2011). La metacognición en el proceso de lectura. Revista Árete, 11 (1), 20-38.
dc.relation.referencesDombrowski, J. (2006). The relationship of self efficacy, time management behavior, intervolve conflict, and number and ages of children in the household to physical activity in working mothers. The Catholic University of American.Unpublished dissertation.
dc.relation.referencesDunlosky, J., & Bjork, R. A. (Eds.). (2013). Handbook of metamemory and memory. Psychology Press.
dc.relation.referencesDwyer, F. M. & Moore, D. (1995). Effect of color coding and test type (visual/verbal) on students identified as possessing different field dependence level. ERIC Document No. Ed 380 078.
dc.relation.referencesEfklides, A. (2006). Metacognition and affect: What can metacognitive experiences tell us about the learning process? Educational Research Review, 1(1), 3-14. doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2005.11.001.
dc.relation.referencesEilam, B., & Aharon, I. (2003). Students' planning in the process of self-regulated learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28, 304-334.
dc.relation.referencesEngle, R., & Conant, F. (2002). Guiding Principles for fostering productive disciplinary engagement: Explaining and emergent argument in a community of learners classroom. Cognition and Instruction, 20(4), 399-483.
dc.relation.referencesFandiño, D. (2018). Planeación, monitoreo y evaluación como estrategias metacognitivas vinculadas en la resolución de problemas auténticos con números decimales (Tesis de maestría). Universidad Autónoma de Manizales.
dc.relation.referencesFernández, A. G. (1993). Aprendizaje autorregulado de la lectura. Revista de psicología general y aplicada: Revista de la Federación Española de Asociaciones de Psicología, 46(3), 351-359.
dc.relation.referencesFernández-Alonso, R., Suárez-Álvarez, J., & Muñiz, J. (2014). Tareas escolares en el hogar y rendimiento en matemáticas: una aproximación multinivel con estudiantes de enseñanza primaria. Revista de Psicología y Educación, 9(2), 15-29.
dc.relation.referencesFernández, E., Bernardo, A., Suárez, N., Cerezo, R., Núñez, J. C., & Rosário, P. (2013). Predicción del uso de estrategias de autorregulación en Educación Superior. Anales de Psicología, 29(3), 865-875.
dc.relation.referencesFlavell, J. H. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. En: L. B. Resnik (ed.). The nature of intelligence (pp. 231-235). Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.
dc.relation.referencesFlavell, J. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906-911. doi:10.1037/0003066x.34.10.906.
dc.relation.referencesFlavell, J.H. (1985) Cognitive Development. U.S.A.: Prentice-Hall.
dc.relation.referencesFlavell, J. H. (1993) El desarrollo cognitivo, Madrid: Visor.
dc.relation.referencesFord, N., Wood, F., Y Walsh, C. (1994). Cognitive styles and searching. Online and CDROM Review, 18(2), 79-86.
dc.relation.referencesFrancis-Smythe, J., & Robertson, I. (1999). On the relationship between time management and time estimation. British Journal of Psychology, 90, 333–347.
dc.relation.referencesFreeman, K. A., & Dexter-Mazza, E. T. (2004). Using self-monitoring with an adolescent with disruptive classroom behavior: Preliminary analysis of the role of adult feedback. Behavior Modification, 28(3), 402-419.
dc.relation.referencesGaeta, M. & Cavazos, J. (2016). Relación entre tiempo de estudio, autorregulación del aprendizaje y desempeño académico en estudiantes universitarios. Revista de Investigación Educativa, n.23, pp.142-166.
dc.relation.referencesGagnière, L., Betrancourt, M., & Détienne, F. (2012). When metacognitive prompts help information search in collaborative setting. Revue Européenne de Psychologie Appliquée/European Review of Applied Psychology, 62(2), 73–81.
dc.relation.referencesGarcía, V. M., Gütl, C., Preis, A. M., Andrews, K., Pivec, M., Mödritscher, F., & Trummer, C. (2004). Adele: A framework for adaptive e-learning through eye tracking. Proceedings of IKNOW, 609-616.
dc.relation.referencesGerhardt, M. W. & Brown, K. G. (2006). Individual differences in self-efficacy development: The effects of goal orientation and affectivity. Learning and Individual Differences, 16, 43-59. DOI: 10.1016/j.lindif.2005.06.006
dc.relation.referencesGoldstein, K. M., Y Blackman, S. (1978). Cognitive Style. New York: Wiley.
dc.relation.referencesGonzález, K., Padilla, J., & Rincón, A. (2011a). Teorías relacionadas al b-learning y el papel del docente. Educación y Desarrollo Social, 5(2), 98-111.
dc.relation.referencesGranott, N. (2005). Scaffolding dynamically toward change: Previous and new perspectives. New Ideas in Psychology, 23(3), 140-151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2006.07.002.
dc.relation.referencesGreen, P., & Skinner, D. (2005). Does time management training work? An evaluation. International Journal of Training and Development, 9, 124–139.
dc.relation.referencesGuinea, G., & Chen, S. (2003). Measuring Quality of Perception in Distributed Multimedia: Verbalizers vs. Imagers. School of Information Systems, Computing and Mathematics.
dc.relation.referencesHacker, D., Dunlosky, J., & Graesser, A. (2009). Handbook of Metacognition in Education (1st ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
dc.relation.referencesHadwin, A. & Winne, P. (2001). CoNoteS2: A software Tool for Promoting Self-Regulation. Educational Research and Evaluation. 7(2/3), 313-334.
dc.relation.referencesHair, J. F. J., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis with readings. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
dc.relation.referencesHandal, B., & Herrington, A. (2004). On Being Dependent or Independent in Computer Based Learning Environments. UTS ePress.
dc.relation.referencesHannafin, M. J., Hill, J. R., & Land, S. M. (1997). Student-centered learning and interactive multimedia: Status, issues, and implication. Contemporary Education, 68(2), 94.
dc.relation.referencesHannafin, M. J., Land, S., & Oliver, K. M. (1999). Open learning environments: Foundations, methods, and models. In C. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: Volume II (pp. 115–140). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
dc.relation.referencesHederich, C. (2004). Estilo cognitivo en la dimensión de dependencia independencia de campo. Influencias culturales e implicaciones para la educación. BellaTerra: Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona.
dc.relation.referencesHederich, C. & Camargo, A. (2000). Estilo cognitivo en la educación. Itinerario Educativo, No. 36, 43-75. Revista de la Facultad de Educación, Universidad de San Buenaventura, Bogotá, Colombia.
dc.relation.referencesHertzog, C., Dixon, R. A., & Hultsch, D. F. (1990). Relationships between metamemory, memory predictions, and memory task performance in adults. Psychology and aging, 5(2), 215.
dc.relation.referencesHildebrand, J. D., & Soriano, P. (1999). Shroom, a PDZ domain–containing actin-binding protein, is required for neural tube morphogenesis in mice. Cell, 99(5), 485-497.
dc.relation.referencesHill, J. R., & Hannafin, M. J. (2001). Teaching and learning in digital environments: The resurgence of resource-based learning. Educational technology research and development, 49(3), 37-52.
dc.relation.referencesHoff, K. E., & DuPaul, G. J. (1998). Reducing disruptive behavior in general education classrooms: The use of self-management strategies. School Psychology Review, 27, 290-303.
dc.relation.referencesHollan, Bederson, & Helfman. (1997). nforation visualization. (L. y. helandel, Ed.) The handbook of Human Ccomputer Interaction, 33-48.
dc.relation.referencesHolton, D., & Thomas, G. (2001). Mathematical Interactions and Their Influence on Learning. In D. Clarke (Ed.), Perspectives on Practice and Meaning in Mathematics and Science Classrooms (pp. 75–104). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-30647228-7_5
dc.relation.referencesHuertas, A. (2016). Efecto de un andamiaje metacognitivo para el uso, manejo y búsqueda de información sobre el desarrollo de habilidades metacognitivas y el logro del aprendizaje en el área de la Química (Tesis doctoral). Universidad Pedagógica Nacional. Bogotá, D.C., Colombia.
dc.relation.referencesIntecipa, M. & Gallego, R. (2015). Efecto de un andamiaje de tipo metacognitivo en un ambiente de aprendizaje basado en la web AABW sobre la comprensión lectora y el logro de aprendizaje en ciencias naturales (Tesis de maestría), Universidad Pedagógica Nacional.
dc.relation.referencesJacops & Paris. (1987). Children`s Metacognition Abaut Reading: Issues in definition, Measurement, and instruction. Educational Psychologist, 255- 278.
dc.relation.referencesJorba, J., & Sanmartí, N. (1993). La función pedagógica de la evaluación. Aula de innovación educativa, 20, 20-30.
dc.relation.referencesJumaat, N. F., & Tasir, Z. (2014). Instructional scaffolding in online learning environment: A meta-analysis. Proceedings - 2014 International Conference on Teaching and Learning in Computing and Engineering, LATICE 2014, 74–77. https://doi.org/10.1109/LaTiCE.2014.22
dc.relation.referencesKagan, J. (1966). Reflection-impulsivity: The generality and dynamics of conceptual tempo. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 71(1), 17-24.
dc.relation.referencesKarbalaei, A. (2011). Metacognition and reading comprehension. Íkala Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura, 5-14.
dc.relation.referencesKarim, N., Nader Hajloob, Nasser Sobhi Garamaleki c, Hasan Sadeghid (2013). The Study Efficacy of Time Management Training on Increase Academic Time Management of Students. The 3rd World Conference on Psychology, Counselling and Guidance (WCPCG-2012)
dc.relation.referencesKern, L., Dunlap, G., Childs, K. E., & Clarke, S. (1994). Use of a classwide self-management program to improve the behavior of students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Education and Treatment of Children, 17, 445-458.
dc.relation.referencesKim, E., & Seo, E. H. (2013). The relationship of flow and self-regulated learning to active procrastination. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 41, 1099–1113.
dc.relation.referencesKim, M., & Hannafin, M. (2011). Scaffolding problem solving in technology-enhanced learning environments (TELEs): Bridging research and theory with practice. Computers & Education, 56(2), 403-417.
dc.relation.referencesKing, A., Winett, R., & Lovett, S. (1986). Enhancing coping behaviours in at-risk populations: The effects of time-management instruction and social support in women from dual-earner families. Behaviour Therapy, 17, 57–66.
dc.relation.referencesKirton, M. (1976). Adaptors and innovators: A description and measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61(5), 622-629.
dc.relation.referencesKitsantas, A., Winsler, A., & Huie, F. (2008). Self-regulation and ability predictors of academic success during college: A predictive validity study. Journal of Advanced Academics, 20, 42–68.
dc.relation.referencesKnörzer, L., Brünken, R., & Park, B. (2016). Facilitators or suppressors: Effects of experimentally induced emotions on multimedia learning. Learning And Instruction, 44, 97-107. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.04.002
dc.relation.referencesKramarski, B., & Gutman, M. (2006). How can self‐regulated learning be supported in mathematical E‐learning environments? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22(1), 24-33.
dc.relation.referencesKramarski, B., & Michalsky, T. (2013). Student and teacher perspectives on IMPROVE self-regulation prompts in web-based learning. In International handbook of metacognition and learning technologies (pp. 35-51). Springer, New York, NY.
dc.relation.referencesKush, J. (1984). Cognitive processing differences in Mexican-American and Anglo-American student. Dissertation abstract international, 45, 1075.
dc.relation.referencesLeader, L. & Klein, J. (1996). The effects of search tool type and cognitive style on performance during hypermedia database searches. Educational Technology Research and Development, 44 (2), 5-15.
dc.relation.referencesLepper, M., & Wolverton, M. (2004). The wisdom of practice: Lessons learned from the study of highly effective tutors. In J. Aranson (Ed.), Improving academic achievement: Impact of psychological factors on education (pp. 135–158). New York, NY: Academic Press.
dc.relation.referencesLiu, M., & Reed, M. (1994). The relationship between the learning strategies and learning styles in a hypermedia environment. Computers in Human Behavior, 419-434.
dc.relation.referencesLópez, O. (2010). Aprendizaje autorregulado, estilo cognitivo y logro académico en ambientes computacionales (Tesis doctoral). Universidad Pedagógica Nacional.
dc.relation.referencesLópez, O. & Hederich, C. (2010). Efecto de un andamiaje para facilitar el aprendizaje autorregulado en ambientes hipermedia. Revista colombiana de educación, 14-39.
dc.relation.referencesLópez, O. & Triana, S. (2013). Efecto de un activador computacional de autoeficacia sobre el logro de aprendizaje en estudiantes de diferente estilo cognitivo. Revista Colombiana de Educación, 64, 225-244.
dc.relation.referencesLópez, O. & Valencia, N. (2012). Diferencias individuales en el desarrollo de la autoeficacia y el logro académico: el efecto de un andamiaje computacional. Acta Colombiana de Psicología, 15 (2), 29-41.
dc.relation.referencesLópez, O., Sanabria, L., y Sanabria, M. (2014). Logro de aprendizaje en ambientes computacionales: Autoeficacia, metas y estilo cognitivo. Psicología desde el Caribe. Universidad del Norte. Vol. 31 (3): 475-494, 2014.
dc.relation.referencesLópez-Vargas, O., Hederich-Martínez, C. & Camargo-Uribe, A. (2011). Estilo Cognitivo y Logro Académico. Educación y Educadores, 67-82.
dc.relation.referencesLópez, O., Hederich, C. & Camargo, A. (2012). Logro de aprendizaje en ambientes hipermediales: andamiaje autorregulador y estilo cognitivo. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 44(2), 13-26.
dc.relation.referencesLópez, O., Hederich-Martínez, C. & Camargo, A. (2012). Logro en matemáticas, autorregulación del aprendizaje y estilo cognitivo. Suma Psicológica, vol. 19, núm. 2, pp. 39-50.
dc.relation.referencesLópez, O., Ibáñez, J., & Racines, O. (2017). Students’ Metacognition and Cognitive Style and Their Effect on Cognitive Load and Learning Achievement. Educational Technology & Society, 20(3), 145-157.
dc.relation.referencesLu, J., Lajoie, S. P., & Wiseman, J. (2010). Scaffolding problem-based learning with CSCL tools. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 5(3), 283-298.
dc.relation.referencesLyons-Lawrence, C. (1994). Effect of Learning Style on Performance in Using Computer-Based Instruction in Office Systems. Delta Pi Epsilon Journal, 36(3).
dc.relation.referencesMacCann, C.; Fogarty, G.; Roberts, R. (2012). Strategies for Success in Education: Time Management Is More Important for Part-Time than Full-Time Community College Students. Learning and Individual Differences, v22 n5 p618-623.
dc.relation.referencesMacan, T. H. (1994). Time management: Test of a process model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 381–391.
dc.relation.referencesMacan, T., Shahani, C., Dipboye, R., & Phillips, A. (1990). College students’ time management: Correlations with academic performance and stress. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 760–768.
dc.relation.referencesMcLaughlin, T. F. (1984). Acomparison of self-recording and self-recording plus consequences for on-task and assignment completion. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 9, 185-192.
dc.relation.referencesManso-Vázquez, Caeiro-Rodríguez & Llamas-Nistal. (2016), Tracking and visualizing time management for Self-Regulated Learners, 2016 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), Erie, PA, USA, 2016, pp. 1-5, doi: 10.1109/FIE.2016.7757411.
dc.relation.referencesMartínez, J., Sanabria, L., & López, O. (2016). Relationships between learning achievement, self-monitoring cognitive style, and learning style in medical students. Praxis & Saber, 141-164.
dc.relation.referencesMartinez-López, R., Yot, C., Tuovila, I., & Perera-Rodríguez, V. H. (2017). Online self-regulated learning questionnaire in a Russian MOOC. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 966-974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.06.015.
dc.relation.referencesMertler, C. A., & Vannatta, R. A. (2013). Advanced and multivariate statistical methods (Multiple Regression). Glendale.
dc.relation.referencesMessick, S. (1976). Personality consistencies in cognition and creativity. In S. Messick (Ed.), Individuality in learning (pp. 4–23). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
dc.relation.referencesMeza, A. (1987). Acerca de los estilos cognitivos dependencia- independencia de campo. Revista de Psicología, Vol. 5, Nº. 2, 1987, págs. 161-176. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=6123415.
dc.relation.referencesMiner, A. y Reder, L. (1994) "A New Look at Feeling of knowing: It´s Metacognitive Role in Regulating Question Answering" en Metcalfe, J. y Shimamura, A. (Eds.) Metacognition: Knowing about Knowing, Massachusetts: MIT Press (pp. 105-137).
dc.relation.referencesMolenaar, I., Roda, C., Boxtel, C. & Sleegers, P. (2012). Dynamic scaffolding of socially regulated learning in a computer-based learning environment. Computers & Education, 59, 515-523.
dc.relation.referencesMolenar, I., van Boxtel, C. & Sleegers, P. (2010). Metacognitive scaffolding in an innovative learning arregement. Instructional Science 39(6),785–803. DOI 10.1007/s11251-010-9154-1.
dc.relation.referencesNadinloyi, K., Hajloo, N., Garamaleki, N. & Sadeghi, H. (2013). The Study Efficacy of Time Management Training on Increase Academic Time Management of Students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. Vol(84). DO: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.523
dc.relation.referencesNelson, T. O. (1996). Consciousness and metacognition. American Psychologist, 51, 102–116. doi:10.1037//0003-066X.51.2.102.
dc.relation.referencesNelson, T. O., & Narens, L. (1990). Metamemory: a theoretical framework and new findings. In G. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation, Vol. 26. New York: Academic Press.
dc.relation.referencesNelson, T. O., & Narens, L. (1994). Why investigate metacognition? In J. Metcalfe, & A. P. Shimamura (Eds.), Metacognition: Knowing about knowing (pp. 1–25)
dc.relation.referencesNikerson, Perkins & Smith. (1994). Enseñar a pensar. Aspectos de la aptitud intelectual. Barcelona: Paidós.
dc.relation.referencesNorman, D. A. (2004). Norman, D. A. (2004). Emotional design: Why we love (or hate) everyday things. New York: Basic Books.
dc.relation.referencesNúñez, J. C., Vallejo, G., Rosário, P., Tuero, E., & Valle, A. (2014). Variables del estudiante, del profesor y del contexto en la predicción del rendimiento académico en Biología: Análisis desde una perspectiva multinivel. Revista de Psicodidáctica, 19(1), 145-172.
dc.relation.referencesNúñez, J. C., Suárez, N., Cerezo, R., González-Pienda, J. A., Rosário, P., Mourao, R., & Valle, A. (2013). Homework and academic achievement across Spanish compulsory education. Educational Psychology, 35(6), 726-746.
dc.relation.referencesPan, I., Regueiro, B., Ponte, B., Rodríguez, S., Piñeiro, I., & Valle, A. (2013). Motivación, implicación en los deberes escolares y rendimiento académico. Aula Abierta, 41(3), 13-22.
dc.relation.referencesPark, S. (2016). Virtual Avatar as an Emotional Scaffolding Strategy to Promote Interest in Online Learning Environment. In Emotions, Technology, Design, and Learning (pp. 201-224). Academic Press.
dc.relation.referencesPark, B., Flowerday, T., & Brünken, R. (2015). Cognitive and affective effects of seductive details in multimedia learning. Computers In Human Behavior, 44, 267-278. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.10.061
dc.relation.referencesPark, B., Plass, J. L., & Brünken, R. (2014). Cognitive and affective processes in multimedia learning.
dc.relation.referencesPea, Wulf, Elliot, & Darling. (2003). Planning for two transformations in education and learning technology. Committee on Improving Learning with Information Technology.
dc.relation.referencesPekrun, R., Goetz, T., Titz, W., & Perry, R. P. (2002). Academic emotions in students self-regulated learning and achievement: a program of qualitative and quantitative research. Educational Psychologist, 37(2), 91e105. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3702_4.
dc.relation.referencesPeterson, L. D., Young, K. R.,West, R. P., & Peterson, M. H. (1999). Effects of student selfmanagement on generalization of student performance to regular classrooms. Education and Treatment of Children, 22, 357-372.
dc.relation.referencesPintrich, P., & Garcia, T. (1991). Student goal orientation and self-regulation in the college classroom. Advances in Motivation and Achievement: Goals and Self-Regulatory Processes, 7, 371-402.
dc.relation.referencesPlass, J., Heidig, S., Hayward, E., Homer, B., & Um, E. (2014). Emotional design in multimedia learning: Effects of shape and color on affect and learning. Learning And Instruction, 29, 128-140. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.02.006
dc.relation.referencesPratama, M., Anavatti, S. G., & Lu, J. (2015). Recurrent Classifier Based on an Incremental Metacognitive-Based Scaffolding Algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 23(6), 2048–2066. doi:10.1109/tfuzz.2015.2402683
dc.relation.referencesPrater, M. A., Hogan, S., & Miller, S. R. (1992). Using self-monitoring to improve on-task behavior and academic skills of an adolescent with mild handicaps across special and regular education settings. Education and Treatment of Children, 15, 43-55.
dc.relation.referencesPuntambekar, S., & Hübscher, R. (2005). Tools for Scaffolding Students in a Complex Learning Environment: What Have We Gained and What Have We Missed? Educational Psychologist, 40(1), 1–12.
dc.relation.referencesQuintana, C., Zhang, M., & Krajcik, J. (2005). A framework for supporting metacognitive aspects of online inquiry through software-based scaffolding. Educational Psychologist, 40(4), 235-244.
dc.relation.referencesRagupathi, K. (2014) Virtually Vygotsky: Using Technology to Scaffold Student Learning: By Adrian Lee. Technology in Pedagogy, 20, 1-9 disponible en : https://cpb-us-w2.wpmucdn.com/blog.nus.edu.sg/dist/6/230/files/2014/04/Technology-in-Pedagogy-20.pdf
dc.relation.referencesRaes, A., Schellens, T., De Wever, B., & Vanderhoven, E. (2012). Scaffolding information problem solving in web-based collaborative inquiry learning. Computers & Education, 59(1), 82-94.
dc.relation.referencesRamos. J. (2006). Evaluación del estilo cognitivo «Dependencia/independencia de campo» en el contexto de los problemas de ansiedad. Clínica y Salud vol.17 no.1 Madrid abr./may. 2006. http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1130-52742006000100002.
dc.relation.referencesRavenscroft, A., Lindstaedt, S., Delgado Kloos, C., & Hernández-Leo, D. (2012, September). 21st century learning for 21st century skills. In Proceedings of 7th European conference on technology enhanced learning, EC-TEL.
dc.relation.referencesRegueiro, B., Suárez, N., Valle, A., Núñez, J. C., & Rosário, P. (2015). La motivación e implicación en los deberes escolares a lo largo de la escolaridad obligatoria. Revista de Psicodidáctica, 20(1), 47-63.
dc.relation.referencesReingold, R., Rimor, R., & Kalay, A. (2008). Instructor's scaffolding in support of student's metacognition through a teacher education online course: a case study. Journal of interactive online learning, 7(2), 139-151.
dc.relation.referencesReiser, B. (2004). Scaffolding complex learning: The mechanisms of structuring and problematizing student work. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13 (3), 273-304.
dc.relation.referencesRiding, R., & Cheema, I. (1991). Cognitive Styles--An Overview and Integration. Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology, 11(3-4), 193-215.
dc.relation.referencesRiding, R., Y Rayner, S. G. (1998). Cognitive Styles and Learning Strategies. London: David Fulton.
dc.relation.referencesSalomon, G., Perkins, D., & Globerson, T. (1991). Partners in cognition: Extending human intelligence with intelligent technologies. Educational Researcher, 20(4), 2-9.
dc.relation.referencesSanabria, R. L., Ibáñez, I. J., & Valencia, V. N. (2015). Ambiente metacognitivo digital para apoyar el aprendizaje de las matemáticas. Revista Papeles, 42-54.
dc.relation.referencesSawa, H. (1966). Analytic thinking and synthetic thinking. Bulletin of Faculty of Education (Nagasaki University), 13, 1-16.
dc.relation.referencesSharma, P., & Hannafin, M. J. (2007). Scaffolding in technology-enhanced learning environments. Interactive Learning Environments, 15(1), 27–46. doi:10.1080/10494820600996972
dc.relation.referencesSchneider, W. (2015). Memory Development from Early Childhood Through Emerging Adulthood. Springer International Publishing, 255-308.
dc.relation.referencesSchneider, S., Nebel, S., & Rey, G. (2016). Decorative pictures and emotional design in multimedia learning. Learning And Instruction, 44, 65-73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.03.002
dc.relation.referencesSchraw, G. (1998). Promoting general metacognitive awareness. Instructional Science, 113115.
dc.relation.referencesSchraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary educational psychology, 19(4), 460-475. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1994.1033.
dc.relation.referencesSchraw, G., & Moshman, D. (1995). Metacognitive theories. Educational psychology review, 7(4), 351-371.
dc.relation.referencesSchraw, G., Wadkins, T., & Olafson, L. (2007). Doing the things we do: A grounded theory of academic procrastination. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 12–25.
dc.relation.referencesSchwen, T.M., Bedner, A.K., Y Hodson, K. (1979). Cogni-tive styles: Boon or bane? Viewpoint in Teaching and Learning, 55, 49-63.
dc.relation.referencesShen, C. Y., & Liu, H. C. (2011). Metacognitive skills development: A web-based approach in higher education. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 10(2), 140-150.
dc.relation.referencesSlaven, G., & Totterdell, P. (1993). Time management training: Does it transfer to the workplace? Journal of Managerial Psychology, 8, 20–28.
dc.relation.referencesStadtler, M., & Bromme, R. (2008). Effects of the metacognitive computer-tool met. a. ware on the web search of laypersons. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(3), 716-737. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2007.01.023.
dc.relation.referencesSuárez, N., Fernández, E., Cerezo, R., Rodríguez, C., Rosário, P., & Núñez, J. C. (2012). Tareas para casa, implicación familiar y rendimiento académico. Aula Abierta, 40(1), 73-84.
dc.relation.referencesSummerville, J. (1999). Role of awareness of cognitive style in hypermedia. International Journal of Educational Technology, 1 (1) [versión electrónica]. Recuperado en marzo del 2006 de: http://www.ao.uiuc.edu/ijet/v1n1/summerville/index.html
dc.relation.referencesSunkel, G., & Trucco, D. (2010). TIC para la educación en América Latina. Riesgos y oportunidades. Serie Políticas sociales, 167, 1-7.
dc.relation.referencesTamayo, M. (2006). La Metacognición en los modelos para la enseñanza y el aprendizaje de las ciencias. En: Los bordes de la pedagogía: del modelo a la ruptura (pp 275-306). Universidad Pedagógica Nacional. Bogotá: Net Educativa Editorial.
dc.relation.referencesTennant, M. (1988). Psychology and adult learning. London: Routledge.
dc.relation.referencesTennan, M., & Pogson, P. (1995). Learning and Change in the Adult Years: A Developmental Perspective. First Edition. Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education Series. Jossey-Bass Social and Behavioral Service Series. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc.
dc.relation.referencesTesouro, M. (2015). La metacognición en la escuela: la importancia de enseñar a pensar. Girona: Aula intelimundo.
dc.relation.referencesTerry, P. (2002). Effect of time management practice on self-regulation, and academic self-efficacy. Dissertation of curriculum and instruction, Virginal University.
dc.relation.referencesThiede, K., Anderson, M., & Therriault, D. (2003). Accuracy of metacognitive monitoring affects learning of texts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 66-73. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.95.1.66.
dc.relation.referencesTimoneda, C. (2012). Cognición, emoción y aprendizaje. Padres y maestros, 2012, núm. 347, p. 5-9. http://hdl.handle.net/10256/8696.
dc.relation.referencesTinajero, C. & Páramo, M. F. (1997). Field dependence-independence and academic achievement: a re-examination of their relationship. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 199-212.
dc.relation.referencesTimothy & Bennett. (2004). Applied Metacognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.relation.referencesTriana, S. (2012). Autoeficacia, estilo cognitivo y logro académico en ambientes computacionales (Tesis de maestría), Universidad Pedagógica Nacional.
dc.relation.referencesUm, E., Plass, J. L., Hayward, E. O., & Homer, B. D. (2011). Emotional design in multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(2), 485e498. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0026609.
dc.relation.referencesValencia, N. (2017). Autoeficacia académica, Capacidad metacognitiva, logro de aprendizaje y estilo cognitivo en ambientes e-learning. Bogotá, Colombia: Tesis Doctoral.
dc.relation.referencesVan Blerkom, M. (1988). Field dependence, sex role self-perceptions, and mathematics achievement. College student: A closer examination. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 13, 339-347.
dc.relation.referencesVan Eerde, W. (2003). Procrastination at work and time management training. Journal of Psychology, 137, 421–434.
dc.relation.referencesVeenman, M., Van Hout-Wolters, B., & Afflerbach, P. (2006). Metacognition and learning: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition and Learning, 1(1), 314. doi:10.1007/s11409-006-6893-0.
dc.relation.referencesWang, S. & Lin, S. S. (2007). The application of social cognitive theory to webbased learning through NetPorts. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(4), 600-612. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00645.x
dc.relation.referencesWarwick, P., Mercer, N., & Kershner, R. (2013). ―Wait, let’s just think about this‖: Using the interactive whiteboard and talk rules to scaffold learning for co-regulation in collaborative science activities. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 2(1), 42–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2012.12.004
dc.relation.referencesWecker, C., Kollar, I., Fischer, F., & Prechtl, H. (2010). Fostering online search competence and domain-specific knowledge in inquiry classrooms: Effects of continuous and fading collaboration scripts.
dc.relation.referencesWeller, H., Repman, J., & Rooze, G. (1994). The Relationship of Learning, Behavior, and Cognitive Style in Hypermedia-Based Instruction. Computers in the Schools, 10(3-4), 401-418.
dc.relation.referencesWhite, B., Shimoda, & Frederiksen, J. (2000). Facilitating students' inquiry learning andmetacognitive development through modifiable software advisors. (N. Erlbaum: Mahwah, Ed.) Computers as Cognitive Tools: No More Walls, 97-132.
dc.relation.referencesWinne, P. (1996). A metacogntive view of individual differences in self-regulated learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 327-353.
dc.relation.referencesWinne, P. (2001). Self-regulated learning viewed from models of information processing. En B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives, (153– 189). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
dc.relation.referencesWinne, P., & Hadwin, A. (1998). Studying as self-regulated learning. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice, (pp. 277–304). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
dc.relation.referencesWitkin, H. A. (1950). Individual differences in ease of perception of embedded figures. Journal of Personality, 19(1), 1-15.
dc.relation.referencesWitkin, H. A. (1964). The ongms of cognitive style. En C. Scheerer (Ed.) Cognition: Theory, researeh, p1Omiu. New York: Harper and Row.
dc.relation.referencesWitkin, H. A. & Goodenough, D. R. (1981). Cognitive styles: Essence and origins. New York, NY: International University Press.
dc.relation.referencesWitkin, H. A., Lewis, H. B., Hertzman, M., Machover, K., Meissner, B., & Wapner, S. (1954). Personality through perception: an experimental and clinical study. Oxford, England: Harper.
dc.relation.referencesWolfgang & Kathrin. (2002). The development of metacognitive knowledge in children and adolescents. En J. Timothy, & B. L., Applied Metacognition (págs. 224-257). Cambridge: Cambridge University.Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The Role Of Tutoring In Problem Solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89–100. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x
dc.relation.referencesWolters, Ch.,Won, S. & Hussain, M. (2017). Examining the relations of time management and procrastination within a model of self-regulated learning. Metacognition Learning. DOI 10.1007/s11409-017-9174-1
dc.relation.referencesWoo, J., Botzheim, J., Kubota, N. (2017) Emotional Empathy Model For Robot Partners Using Recurrent Spiking Neural Network Model With Hebbian-LMS Learning, Malaysian Journal of Computer Science. 30(4). Disponible en: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/eb81/823343bb27a3b607221ec22b638397c6a4c8.pdf
dc.relation.referencesWu, H. & Pedersen, S. (2011). Integrating computer- and teacher-based scaffolds in science inquiry. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2352-2363.
dc.relation.referencesZhang, L. S. (2004). Field-dependence/independence: cognitive style or perceptual ability? -validating against thinking style and academic achievement. Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 1295-1311.
dc.rights.accessAcceso abiertospa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.creativecommonsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectGestión del tiempospa
dc.subjectMonitoreo de aprendizajespa
dc.subjectAutomonitoreo de aprendizajespa
dc.subjectLogro de aprendizajespa
dc.subjectDiseño emocionalspa
dc.subjectEstilo cognitivospa
dc.subject.keywordsTime managementeng
dc.subject.keywordsLearning monitoringeng
dc.subject.keywordsSelf - Monitoring of learningeng
dc.subject.keywordsLearning achievementeng
dc.subject.keywordsEmotional designeng
dc.subject.keywordsCognitive styleeng
dc.titleAmbiente virtual con software motivacional y su efecto en el logro de aprendizaje, el monitoreo del aprendizaje, la gestión del tiempo y el estilo cognitivo en la Dimensión DIC.spa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdcceng
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesiseng
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.type.localTesis/Trabajo de grado - Monografía - Maestríaspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.type.versionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
ambiente virtual con software motivacional y su efecto en el logro de aprendizaje.pdf
Tamaño:
2.42 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Descargar

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 2 de 2
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
1.71 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción:
Descargar
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
licencia_de_uso William.pdf
Tamaño:
822.99 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Descargar

Colecciones

Maestría en Tecnologías de la Información aplicadas a la Educación