Representaciones múltiples y comprensión de documentos en el dominio de la tecnología.

dc.contributor.authorMaldonado Granados, Luis Facundospa
dc.contributor.authorSe queda Tarazona., Juanspa
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-02T16:53:09Z
dc.date.available2021-08-02T16:53:09Z
dc.date.issued2002-05-11
dc.description.abstractLa mayor parte del conocimiento humano se conserva en documentos escritos. Entre estos ocupan un lugar importante los textos sobre temas técnicos. Su comprensión es una tarea difícil para la mayoría de los lectores. Este artículo describe un experimento que compara tres formas de representación de un mismo tema técnico usando una plataforma hipertextual: una que utiliza sólo texto, otra que acompaña el texto con diagramas y gráficas y la tercera que utiliza texto y simulaciones. Los sujetos fueron 85 estudiantes de décimo grado de un colegio con orientación técnica, los cuales fueren asignados aleatoriamente a una de las tres condiciones. Se utilizó un diseño experimental pretest-postest y una medición adicional de retención. Los resultados muestran que con diagramas y gráficas el texto es más comprensible, pero, que con animaciones, la tasa de retención es mayor.spa
dc.description.abstractenglishHuman knowledge is mainly found in printed documents. Among them, technical documents compound a relevant type of literature whose understanding a is an effort consuming task This article is dealing with an experimental study which compares three representation strategies: the fist one is only text based, the second uses graphics and diagrams together with text and the last one is simulation addressed. A sample of 85 tenth grade students from a technical oriented school was randomly assigned to each of the experimental conditions. A pretest - posttest experimental design was conducted with an additional retention test. The results show that diagrams and graphics ease text comprehension, and simulation increases retention rate.eng
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.identifierhttps://revistas.upn.edu.co/index.php/TED/article/view/5605
dc.identifier10.17227/ted.num11-5605
dc.identifier.issn2323-0126
dc.identifier.issn2665-3184
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12209/15623
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisherEditorial Universidad Pedagógica Nacionalspa
dc.relationhttps://revistas.upn.edu.co/index.php/TED/article/view/5605/4622
dc.relation.referencesBlackwell, Alan F. (1996). “Chasing the lntuition of and lndustry: Can Pictures Help Us Think?”. ln M. lreland (Ed.): Proceedings of the first Psyohology of Programming lnterest Group Postgraduate Student Workshop. Pg. 13-24.eng
dc.relation.referencesBlackwell, Alan F. (1997). “Diagrams about Thoughts about Thoughts about Diagrams”. ln M. Anderson, (Ed.) Reasoning with Diagrammatic Representations II: Papers from the AAAI 1997 PalI Symposium. Technical Report FS-97-02. Menlo Park, California: AAAI Press. Pg. 77-84.eng
dc.relation.referencesFinke, R. A.; Pinker, S. y Farah, M. J. (1989). Reinterpreting visual patterns in mental imagely. Cognitive Science 13:51-78.eng
dc.relation.referencesGlenberg, A. M.; Langston, W. E. (1992). Comprehension of illustrated text: Pictures help to build mental models. Journal of Memory and Language 31:129-151.eng
dc.relation.referencesGoodman, N. (1969). Languages of art: An approach to a theory of symbols. London: Oxford University Press.eng
dc.relation.referencesGoel, Vinod y Pirolli, Peter (1992). “The Structure of Design Problems Space”. En: Cognitive Science. No. 6, Stanford, Pp. 395-429.eng
dc.relation.referencesGreen T.R.G. y Petre, M. (1996). Usability analysis of visual programming en vironments: a ‘cognitive dimensions’ approach. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing 7, Pg. 131-174.eng
dc.relation.referencesHegarty, M. (1992). Mental animation: lnferring motion from static displays of mechanical systems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Oognition 18, Pg. 1084-1102.eng
dc.relation.referencesHegarty, Mary (1995). “Mental Animation. University of California, Santa Barbara”. ln: Glasgow J., Narayaran N. H. And Chandrasekaran, B. (Edit): Diagrammatic Reasoning. Cognitive and computational perspectives. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.eng
dc.relation.referencesHuttenlocher, J. (1968). “Constructing spatial images: a strategy in reasoning’. ln: Psychological Review 75. Pg. 550-560.eng
dc.relation.referenceslttelson, W. H. (1996). Visual perception of markings. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 3. Pg.171-187.eng
dc.relation.referencesKearins, J. M. (1981). “Visual spatial memory in Australian Aboriginal children of desert regions”. En: Cognitive Psychology 13. Pg. 434-460.eng
dc.relation.referencesKintsch, Walter (1994). “Text Comprehension, Memory, and Learning”. ln: American Psychologist Association. Vol. 49, No. 4. Pg. 294-303.eng
dc.relation.referencesLarkin, J. H. y Simon, H. A. (1987). Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words. Cognitive Science 11. Pg. 65-99.eng
dc.relation.referencesLinde, C. y Labov, W. (1975). Spatialstructures as a site for the study of Ianguage and thought. Language, 51. Pg. 924-939.eng
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.creativecommonsAttribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
dc.sourceTecné, Episteme y Didaxis: TED; Núm. 11 (2002)spa
dc.sourceTecné, Episteme y Didaxis: TED; No. 11 (2002)spa
dc.sourceTecné, Episteme y Didaxis: TED; n. 11 (2002)spa
dc.subjectRepresentaciones múltiplesspa
dc.subjectImaginería mentalspa
dc.subjectAnimación mentalspa
dc.subjectMotores de inducciónspa
dc.subjectMotores monofásicos de inducciónspa
dc.subjectHipertextospa
dc.subjectAmbientes de aprendizaje basados en computadorspa
dc.titleRepresentaciones múltiples y comprensión de documentos en el dominio de la tecnología.spa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501eng
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleeng
dc.type.localArtículo de revistaspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

Archivos