Social media in environmental education: towards collaborative learning and initial critical thinking.

dc.contributor.advisorPérez Gómez, Francisco Antoniospa
dc.contributor.authorPuentes Pineros, Natalia Andreaspa
dc.coverage.spatialBogotá, Colombiaspa
dc.coverage.temporalBogotá, Colombia 2021-2022spa
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-15T20:31:52Z
dc.date.available2022-06-15T20:31:52Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractLas clases de inglés deberían acoger esas dinámicas digitales, así como magnificar el uso y el aprendizaje del inglés en diferentes áreas y no solo con base en la gramática. De manera tal que, el uso de las redes sociales para crear conciencia ambiental aparece como un medio para crear un entorno de aprendizaje socialmente colaborativo y para mejorar el pensamiento crítico ambiental básico. Esta propuesta pedagógica tiene como objetivo desarrollar la sensibilidad ambiental en los estudiantes de décimo grado más allá de las habilidades lingüísticas tradicionales, considerando las dinámicas tecnológicas y las estrategias transversales en la escuela. Teniendo en cuenta lo anterior, el enfoque de aprendizaje integrador de contenido y lengua (CLIL por sus siglas en inglés) juega un papel importante en la creación del pensamiento y la enseñanza transversales, porque permite entender el del inglés como una herramienta para comunicar conocimientos del mundo y opiniones sobre la actualidad, como los problemas ambientales. Para concluir, la propuesta pedagógica está dirigida a generar un aprendizaje colaborativo y un pensamiento crítico inicial utilizando como herramientas las redes sociales, una página web y la educación ambiental, todo esto enmarcado en el enfoque CLIL (por sus siglas en inglés).spa
dc.description.abstractenglishEnglish classes should enhance those digital dynamics as well as magnify English use and learning in different areas and not just as grammar-based. Hence, the use of social media to create environmental awareness appears as a means to create a socially collaborative learning environment and to enhance basic ecological critical thinking. This pedagogical proposal aims to develop environmental sensitivity in tenth graders beyond traditional linguistic skills, by considering the technological dynamics and cross-curricular strategies. Bearing in mind the above, the content and language integrating learning (CLIL) approach plays an important role in the creation of cross-curricular thinking and teaching because it allows understanding English learning as a tool for communicating knowledge of the world and opinions on current problems, like environmental issues. In sum, the pedagogical proposal is aimed to create collaborative learning and initial critical thinking using social media, a web page, and environmental education as tools, all this framed in the CLIL approach.spa
dc.description.degreelevelPregradospa
dc.description.degreenameLicenciado en Español y Lenguas Extranjerasspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad Pedagógica Nacionalspa
dc.identifier.reponamereponame: Repositorio Institucional UPNspa
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl: http://repositorio.pedagogica.edu.co/
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12209/17420
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherUniversidad Pedagógica Nacionalspa
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Humanidadesspa
dc.publisher.programLicenciatura en Español y Lenguas Extranjerasspa
dc.relation.referencesAhlqvist, Toni & Bäck, A. & Halonen, Minna & Heinonen, Sirkka. (2008). Social media roadmaps exploring the futures triggered by social media. Pp. 1-79. ISBN 978-951-38-7247-2. http://www.vtt.fi/publications/index.jsp
dc.relation.referencesAldana, A. P. & Gutiérrez, J. A. (2020). A pedagogical proposal towards environmental awareness through a school newspaper [Universidad Pedagogica Nacional -Undergraduate thesis]. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12209/12677.
dc.relation.referencesBallard, B. (2002). How critical is critical thinking? A generic issue for language in development. International Journal of Higher Education. Vol. 7, No. 4; 2018. http://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/ijhe
dc.relation.referencesBurns, A. (2010). Doing Action Research in Language Teaching: A Guide for Practitioners. NY: Routledge. Pp. 196. Reviewed by Trudie Aberdeen, PhD Candidate in Educational Psychology, the University of Alberta.
dc.relation.referencesCabe, K (2009). Teaching Science During the Early Childhood Years. National Geographic Learning Journal / Cengage. NGL.Cengage.com/School
dc.relation.referencesCEFR. (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment: Companion Volume with New Descriptors. Language Policy Programme. Council of Europe.
dc.relation.referencesClavijo, A. (2016). English teaching in the elementary school: Some critical issues. Colombia : Colomb. Appl. Linguist. Journal. Vol 18, No 1. 2016. January-June https://doi.org/10.14483/calj.v18n1.aa00
dc.relation.referencesContreras, J., & Chapetón, C.M. (2017). Transforming EFL Classroom Practices and Promoting Students’ Empowerment: Collaborative Learning from a Dialogical Approach. PROFILE Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 19(2), 135-149. http://dx.doi.org/10.15446/profile.v19n2.57811. ISSN 1657-0790
dc.relation.referencesContreras, J., & Chapetón, C.M. (2016). Cooperative Learning with a Focus on the Social: A Pedagogical Proposal for the EFL Classroom. HOW, 23(2), 125-147. http://dx.doi.org/10.19183/how.23.2.321
dc.relation.referencesCorbin, J., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded Theory Research: Procedures, Canons, and Evaluative Criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13(1), 3-21. https://med-fom- familymed-research.sites.olt.ubc.ca/files/2012/03/W10-Corbin-and-Strauss- grounded-theory.pdf
dc.relation.referencesCoyle, D. (2007). Content and language integrated learning: towards a connected research agenda for CLIL pedagogies. The International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 10: 543-562. https://doi.org/10.2167/beb459.0
dc.relation.referencesEshach, H., & Fried M. N. (2005). Should science be taught in early childhood? Journal of Science Education and Technology, 14(3), 315-336. DOI:10.1007/s10956-005-7198-9
dc.relation.referencesFauville, Géraldine & Lantz-Andersson, Annika & Säljö, Roger. (2012). International Student Carbon Footprint Challenge - Social Media as a Content and Language Integrated Learning Environment [Undergraduate Thesis] University of Poland 10.14705/rpnet.2012.000030.
dc.relation.referencesFreitag, M. F. (2019, February ). Internet Use and Volunteering: Relationships and Differences Across Age and Applications. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations. , Volume 30 (Issue 1), pp 87–97. 10.1007/s11266-018-0045-4
dc.relation.referencesFundación Botellas de amor. 2018. Llena una botella de amor. https://botellasdeamor.org/como-persona/
dc.relation.referencesGarcía, María & Pavón, Víctor. (2012). Investigating the coexistence of the mother tongue and the foreign language through teacher collaboration in CLIL contexts: Perceptions and practice of the teachers involved in the plurilingual programme in Andalusia. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism. 15. 1-20. 10.1080/13670050.2012.670195.
dc.relation.referencesGlaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2017). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Routledge.Fandino, Y. (2013). 21st Century Skills and the English Foreign Language Classroom: A Call for More Awareness in Colombia. GIST – Education and Learning Research Journal, (7), 190 - 208. https://latinjournal.org/index.php/gist/article/view/622
dc.relation.referencesGrundy,S. and Kemmis,S. (1981). Educational Action Research in Australia: The state of the Art. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Australian Association for Research in Education, Adelaide as cited in Grundy,S. (1988). Three Modes Of Action Research in Kemmis,S. and McTaggert,R. (Ed). (1988). The Action Research Reader (3 ed) Geelong: Deakin University Press.
dc.relation.referencesHoepfl, M. C. (1997). Choosing qualitative research: A primer for technology education researchers. Journal of Technology Education, 9, p. 47-63. http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/JTE/v9n1/pdf/hoepfl.pdf
dc.relation.referencesJacobs, G. M. (2004, September). Cooperative learning: Theory, principles, and techniques. Paper presented at the First International Online Conference on Second and Foreign Language Teaching and Research. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED573881
dc.relation.referencesKapoor et al, K. (2018). Advances in Social Media Research: Past, Present and Future. Inf Syst Front, 20, pp. 531–558.
dc.relation.referencesKemmis, S & McTaggert, R, (1990). The Action Research Planner Geelong: Deakin University Press
dc.relation.referencesKnowles, M. (1984). Andragogy in Action. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
dc.relation.referencesLanguage Policy Programme. (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment: Companion Volume with New Descriptors. Council of Europe.
dc.relation.referencesMarshall, C., & Rossman, G. (2016). Designing qualitative research. Sage Publications. https://books.google.es/books?hl=es&lr=&id=qTByBgAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PT8
dc.relation.referencesMcCutcheon,G., and Jurg, B., (1990). Alternative Perspectives on Action Research. Theory into Practice Volume 24, Number 3 Summer
dc.relation.referencesMejia, d. (2006). Bilingual education in Colombia: Towards a recognition of languages, cultures, and identities. (8) Section Theme review Colombia: Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal. DOI:10.14483/22487085.176
dc.relation.referencesMEN. (2016). Derechos Básicos de Aprendizaje: Inglés Grados 6 a 11. Bogotá.
dc.relation.referencesMEN. (2006). Estándares Básicos de Competencias en Lenguas Extranjeras: inglés. Bogotá.
dc.relation.referencesMEN. (2016). Pedagogical principles and guidelines: Suggested English Curriculum. Anexo 15. Bogotá.
dc.relation.referencesMEN. (2017) Lineamientos generales y orientaciones para la educación formal de personas jóvenes y adultas en Colombia.
dc.relation.referencesMerriam, S. B. (Ed.) (2007). Third update on adult learning theory. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, No. 119. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
dc.relation.referencesMete, P. D. (2018). Incorporating Environmental Education in English Language Teaching through Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy. Selçuk Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi , (40) , pp. 33-44 . DOI: 10.21497/sefad.514847
dc.relation.referencesNkwetisama, C. M. (2011, April). EFL/ESL and Environmental Education: Towards an Eco-Applied Linguistic Awareness in Cameroon. World Journal of Education, 1(1). ISSN 1925-0754 (Online). https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v1n1p110
dc.relation.referencesPalmer, J. (2003). Environmental education in the 21st century (pp. 3-24). New York : Routledge.
dc.relation.referencesPalmer, J et al. (2003). The handbook of environmental education. New York: Routledge.
dc.relation.referencesPatton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
dc.relation.referencesPhillips, D, & Carr, K. (2010). Becoming a teacher through action research. Routledge. https://arifsuryopriyatmojo.files.wordpress.com/2014/03/becoming-a-teacher- through-action-research.pdf
dc.relation.referencesPonton, M. K., & Rhea, N. E. (2006). Autonomous learning from a social cognitive perspective. New Horizons in Adult Education and Human Resource Development, 20(2), 38-49. http://education.fiu.edu/newhorizons
dc.relation.referencesRapoport, R.N, (1970). Three Dilemmas in Action Research. Human Relations 23:6;499. as cited in McKernanJ. (1991). Curriculum Action Research. A Handbook of Methods and Resources for the Reflective Practitioner London: Kogan Page
dc.relation.referencesRincón, J & Clavijo Olarte, A. (2016). Fostering EFL learners' literacies through local inquiry in a multimodal experience. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 18(2), p. 67-82. https://doi.org/10.14483/calj.v18n2.10610
dc.relation.referencesRodriguez Bonces, M. (2011). CLIL: Colombia leading into content language learning. Íkala, Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura, 16(28), 79-89. http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0123-34322011000200004&lng=en&tlng=en.
dc.relation.referencesSlavin, R. E. (1991). Student Team Learning: A Practical Guide to Cooperative Learning. Washington DC: National Education Association. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED339518
dc.relation.referencesSutton, J, & Austin, Z. (2015). Qualitative Research: Data Collection, Analysis, and Management. The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy, 68(3), 226–231. https://doi.org/10.4212/cjhp.v68i3.1456
dc.relation.referencesTartari, Elda. (2015). The Use of Social Media for Academic Purposes in Student’ Learning Process. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies. 10.5901/ajis.2015.v4n2p393.
dc.relation.referencesThorne, S. (2000). Data analysis in qualitative research: Evidence-Based Nursing. 2000; Vol. 3. P. 68-70.
dc.relation.referencesTudor, I. (2001). The dynamics of the language classroom. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
dc.relation.referencesUndurraga-Infante, C. ¿Cómo aprenden los adultos? Una mirada psicoeducativa. Santiago, Chile, 2004. P156.
dc.relation.referencesVygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
dc.relation.referencesWolff, D. (2012). The European framework for CLIL teacher education. Bergische Univerität Wuppertal. Fachbreich A, Deutschland. Synergies Italie n 8. Pp 105-116. https://gerflint.fr/Base/Italie8/dieter_wolff.pdf
dc.relation.referencesWong et al, C. &. (2017). Seamless Language learning: Second Language Learning with Social Media. Media Education Research Journal , 09-2
dc.relation.referencesJohnson, D., Johnson R. & Holubec, E. (1994) Cooperative Learning in the Classroom. Virginia: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.creativecommonsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectAprendizaje colaborativospa
dc.subjectCLILspa
dc.subjectEducación ambientalspa
dc.subjectPensamiento crítico inicialspa
dc.subjectRedes socialesspa
dc.subject.keywordsCLILeng
dc.subject.keywordsCollaborative learningeng
dc.subject.keywordsEnvironmental educationeng
dc.subject.keywordsInitial critical thinkingeng
dc.subject.keywordsSocial mediaeng
dc.titleSocial media in environmental education: towards collaborative learning and initial critical thinking.spa
dc.title.translatedSocial media in environmental education: towards collaborative learning and initial critical thinking.spa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1feng
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesiseng
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.type.localTesis/Trabajo de grado - Monografía - Pregradospa

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
Social media in environmental education.pdf
Tamaño:
2.17 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 2 de 2
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
1.71 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción:
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
202203250096963-03JUN22-NATALIAPUENTES.pdf
Tamaño:
42.28 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
LICENCIA APROBADA