Focused explicit written corrective feedback : improving EFL learners written production.
| dc.contributor.advisor | Montaño Moreno, Johanna | spa |
| dc.contributor.author | Ostos Carrillo, Juan Diego | |
| dc.coverage.spatial | Bogotá | spa |
| dc.coverage.temporal | Bogotá, Colombia - 2023-2024. | spa |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-12-11T19:50:34Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2024-12-11T19:50:34Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2024 | |
| dc.description.abstract | This study investigates the effects of Focused Explicit Written Corrective Feedback (WCF) on the written production of 10th-grade EFL students at Liceo Femenino Mercedes Nariño. Through a mixed-methods approach, the research analyzes both quantitative data from students' writing tasks and qualitative data from questionnaires and interviews. The study involved 16 students, who completed a series of writing tasks over three months. Each task received feedback focusing on specific grammatical issues such as modal verbs, quantifiers, and simple past tense. The results demonstrated a reduction in the number of grammatical errors over time, with most students showing improvement in their writing accuracy. Interviews and questionnaires revealed that WCF impacted students' self-perception and motivation towards writing in English mostly in a positive way. The study highlights the benefits of providing Focused Explicit Written Corrective Feedback, while also acknowledging the challenges some students face in fully integrating it into their learning processes. | spa |
| dc.description.abstractenglish | Este estudio investiga los efectos de la Retroalimentación Correctiva Escrita Explícita y Enfocada (WCF, por sus siglas en inglés) en la producción escrita de estudiantes de inglés de décimo grado en el Liceo Femenino Mercedes Nariño. A través de un enfoque de métodos mixtos, la investigación analiza tanto datos cuantitativos de las tareas escritas de los estudiantes como datos cualitativos de cuestionarios y entrevistas. El estudio incluyó a 16 estudiantes, quienes completaron una serie de tareas de escritura a lo largo de tres meses. Cada tarea recibió retroalimentación enfocándose en problemas gramaticales específicos como los verbos modales, cuantificadores y el tiempo pasado simple. Los resultados demostraron una reducción en la cantidad de errores gramaticales a lo largo del tiempo, con la mayoría de los estudiantes mostrando una mejora en la precisión de su escritura. Las entrevistas y cuestionarios revelaron que el WCF tuvo un impacto mayormente positivo en la autopercepción y la motivación de los estudiantes para mejorar su escritura. El estudio destaca los beneficios de proporcionar retroalimentación explícita y enfocada, al tiempo que reconoce los desafíos que algunos estudiantes enfrentan para integrar plenamente la retroalimentación en sus procesos de aprendizaje. | spa |
| dc.description.degreelevel | Pregrado | spa |
| dc.description.degreename | Licenciado en Español y Lenguas Extranjeras | spa |
| dc.description.sponsorship | Universidad Pedagogica Nacional | spa |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | spa |
| dc.identifier.instname | instname:Universidad Pedagógica Nacional | spa |
| dc.identifier.reponame | reponame: Repositorio Institucional UPN | spa |
| dc.identifier.repourl | repourl: http://repositorio.pedagogica.edu.co/ | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12209/20409 | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | spa |
| dc.publisher | Universidad Pedagógica Nacional | spa |
| dc.publisher.faculty | Facultad de Humanidades | spa |
| dc.publisher.program | Licenciatura en Español y Lenguas Extranjeras | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Acharya, A., Prakash, A., Saxena, P., & Nigam, A. (2013). Sampling: Why and how of it? Indian Journal of Medical Specialties, 4(2), 330-333. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Agustin, M.(2011). Lexical errors and accuracy in foreign language writing. Multilingual Matters. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Alimohammadi, B., & Nejadansari, D. (2014). Written corrective feedback: Focused and unfocused. Theory and practice in language studies, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.4.3.581-587 | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Araghi, S., & Sahebkheir, F. (2014). The effect of focused versus unfocused corrective feedback on developing grammatical accuracy of Iranian EFL learners’ written performance within different gender groups. Indian Journal of Fundamental and Applied Life Sciences, 4(S3), 720–729. Retrieved from http://www.cibtech.org/sp.ed/jls/2014/03/jls.htm | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Ashwell, T. (2000). Patterns of teacher response to student writing in a multiple-draft composition classroom: Is content feedback followed by form feedback the best method? Journal of Second Language Writing, 9(3), 227–258. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Barabasheva, I. (2021). Feedback As a Means Of Motivation In Foreign Language Teaching. In O. Kolmakova, O. Boginskaya, & S. Grichin (Eds.), Language and Technology in the Interdisciplinary Paradigm, vol 118. European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences (pp. 221-227). European Publisher. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Bitchener, J. & Ferris, D. (2012). Written Corrective Feedback in Second Language Acquisition and Writing. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Blanco, C. (2022, 8 Junio). 10 things all languages have in common. Recuperado 5 de octubre de 2024. https://blog.duolingo.com/language-similarities/#:~:text=3.,and%20languages%20from%20every%20continent. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | British Educational Research Association. (2018). Ethical guidelines for educational research (4th ed.). London, UK: Author. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Borko, H., Kuffner, K., Arnold, S., Creighton, L., Stecher, B., Martinez, F., Barnes, D., & Gilbert, M. L. (2007). Using artifacts to describe instruction: Lessons learned from studying reform-oriented instruction in middle school mathematics and science (CRESST Technical Report). CRESST/University of Colorado, Boulder & RAND. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Burns, A. (2010). Doing Action Research in Language Teaching: A Guide for Practitioners. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Cambridge University Press. (2020). Giving feedback to language learners [Cambridge Papers in ELT Series]. Retrieved from https://www.cambridge.org/us/files/4415/8594/0876/Giving_Feedback_minipaper_O NLINE.pdf | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Carey, B. (2014). How we learn: The surprising truth about when, where, and why it happens. Random House. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming critical: Education, knowledge and action research. London: Falmer. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Carroll, S., & Swain, M. (1993). Explicit and implicit negative feedback: An empirical study of the learning of linguistic generalization. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15(3), 357–386. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100012158 | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Casanave, C. (1994). Language development in students’ journals. Journal of Second Language Writing, 3(3) 179-201. [ Links] | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Çinar, S. (2017). The Efficacy of Corrective Feedback on L2 Writings of EFL Students. European Journal of Language and Literature Studies, 3(2), N 2411-4103. https://revistia.org/files/articles/ejls_v3_i2_17/Senanur.pdf | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Clear, J. (2018). Atomic Habits: an easy & proven way to build good habits & break bad ones (PDF ed.). New York: Avery. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Creswell, J. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Creswell, J., and Vicki L. Plano, C. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. 3rd ed., SAGE Publications, 2017. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Conference of Modern Languages of the Council of Europe (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Companion volume. Cambridge University Press. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Conference of Modern Languages of the Council of Europe (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Cambridge University Press. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Corder, S. (1967). The significance of learners' errors. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 5(1-4), 161–170 | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Correa, R. Martínez-Fuentealba, M. Molina de la Barra, M. Silva-Roja, J. & Torres- Cisternas, M. (2013). The Impact of Explicit Feedback on EFL High School Students Engaged in Writing Tasks. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Coyne, J. (2009). Why evolution is true. Viking. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Ellis, R., Loewen, S., & Erlam, R. (2006). Implicit and Explicit Corrective Feedback and the Acquisition of L2 Grammar. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 339-368. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Ellis, R., Sheen, Y., Murakami, M., & Takashima, H. (2008). The Effects of Focused and Unfocused Written Corrective Feedback in an English as a Foreign Language Context. System, 36, 353-371. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Fan, N. & Ma, Y. (2018). The Role of Written Corrective Feedback in Second Language Writing Practice. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 8(12), 1629-1635 http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0812.08 | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Fashemian, S., & Farhang, P. (2018). Grammatical accuracy and its relationship with overall writing quality in Iranian EFL learners. International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning, 7(2), 35-46. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Hattie, J. & Timperley, H. (2007) The Power of Feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112. DOI: 10.3102/003465430298487 | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Harmer, J. (2004). How to Teach Writing. Pearson Education. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Jackson, R. (2009). Never work harder than your students & other principles of great teaching. ASCD. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Kepner, C. (1991). An experiment in the relationship of types of written feedback to the development of second-language writing skills. The Modern Language Journal, 75(3), 305–313. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1991.tb05359.x | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Khan, S. (2014). Qualitative Research Method: Grounded Theory. International Journal of Business and Management, 9 | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Krashen, S. (1985). The Input Hypothesis: Issues and Implication. New York: Longman. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Kineshanko, M. (2016). A thematic synthesis of Community of Inquiry research 2000-2014. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Koerber, A., & McMichael, L. (2008). Qualitative sampling methods: A primer for technical communicators. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 22(4), 454–473. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651908320362 | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Laboratorio de Economía de la Educación (LEE) de la Pontificia Universidad Javeriana. (2023). Informe No. 69. Inglés, el factor de competitividad pendiente en Colombia. https://lee.javeriana.edu.co/publicaciones-y-documentos | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Lincoln, Y. & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | McKinley, J., & Rose, H. (Eds.). (2023). The Routledge handbook of research methods in applied linguistics. Routledge. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Mashuri, S. & Sarib, M. & Alhabsyi, F. & Syam, H. & Ruslin, R. (2022). Semi-structured Interview: A Methodological Reflection on the Development of a Qualitative Research Instrument in Educational Studies. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Mashrah, H. (2017). The role of implicit negative feedback in language development: Some reflections. *International Journal of English Language & Translation Studies*, 5(1), 1-7. http://www.eltsjournal.org/archive/value5%20issue1/1-5-1-17.pdf | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Nunan, D. (1995). Language Teaching Technology: A Textbook for Teachers. London: Phoenix ELT. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Petchprasert, A. (2012). Feedback in Second Language Teaching and Learning. US-China Foreign Language, 10(4), 1112-1120. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Polio, C., & Friedman, D. (2017). Understanding, evaluating, and conducting second language writing research. Second Language Acquisition Research Series. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Robert. Yin. (2014). Case study research design and methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 282 pages.https://www.youscience.com/pretest-and-posttest-in-education/ | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Rahim, S. & Jaganathan, P. (2022). Languaging, corrective feedback, and writing accuracy among low proficiency L2 learners. REiLA: Journal of Research and Innovation in Language, 4(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.31849/reila.v4i1.7420 | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Saeedakhtar A, Abdi R, Akbari A. The Effect of Focused and Unfocused Written Corrective Feedback on the Accuracy of Iranian learners’ Simple Past Tense. LRR 2021; 12 (1) :43-80 | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Schwartz, B. (1993). On explicit and negative data effecting and affecting competence and "linguistic behavior." Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15(2), 147-163. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Sheen, Y., Wright, D., & Moldawa, A. (2009). Differential effects of focused and unfocused written correction on the accurate use of grammatical forms by adult ESL learners. System, 37(4), 556–569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2009.09.002 | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Srichanyachon, N. (2012). Teacher Written Feedback for L2 Learners’ Writing Development. Silpakorn University Journal of Social Sciences, Humanities, and Arts, 12(1), 7-17, 2012. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Stake, R. (2005). Qualitative Case Studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 443–466). Sage Publications | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Tanner, D. and Tanner, L. (1980). Curriculum Development: Theory into Practice. New York: Macmillan. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Tatawy, M. (2002). Corrective Feedback in Second Language Acquisition. Studies in Applied Linguistics & TESOL, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.7916/salt.v2i2.1645 | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Truscott, J. (1996). The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language Learning, 46(2), 327-369 | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Ur, P. (2006). A course in language teaching: Practice and theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Van Beuningen, C. (2011). The effectiveness of comprehensive corrective feedback in second language writing. Universiteit van Amsterdam. https://pure.uva.nl/ws/files/3672639/90090_thesis.pdf | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Waller, L. (2015). Motivation and written corrective feedback: How students' implicit theories of writing intelligence influence their writing motivation and orientation to written corrective feedback. DOI: 10.1016/j.jslw.2017.01.004 | spa |
| dc.relation.references | Zeitlhofer, I., Hörmann, S., Mann, B., Hallinger, K., & Zumbach, J. (2023). Effects of cognitive and metacognitive prompts on learning performance in digital learning environments. Knowledge, 3(2), 277-292. https://doi.org/10.3390/knowledge3020019 | spa |
| dc.rights.accessrights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
| dc.rights.accessrights | http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 | |
| dc.rights.creativecommons | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International | |
| dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | |
| dc.subject | Retroalimentación enfocada | spa |
| dc.subject | Retroalimentación explícita | spa |
| dc.subject | Precisión gramatical | spa |
| dc.subject | Retroalimentación correctiva | spa |
| dc.subject | Aprendizaje de idiomas | spa |
| dc.subject | Enseñanza de idiomas | spa |
| dc.subject | Producción escrita | spa |
| dc.subject.keywords | Focused feedback | eng |
| dc.subject.keywords | Explicit feedback | eng |
| dc.subject.keywords | Grammar accuracy | eng |
| dc.subject.keywords | Corrective feedback | eng |
| dc.subject.keywords | Language learning | eng |
| dc.subject.keywords | Language teaching | eng |
| dc.subject.keywords | Written production | eng |
| dc.title | Focused explicit written corrective feedback : improving EFL learners written production. | spa |
| dc.title.translated | Focused explicit written corrective feedback: improving EFL learners written production. | eng |
| dc.type.coar | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1f | eng |
| dc.type.driver | info:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis | eng |
| dc.type.hasVersion | info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion | |
| dc.type.local | Tesis/Trabajo de grado - Monografía - Pregrado | spa |
Archivos
Bloque original
1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
- Nombre:
- Feedback research.pdf
- Tamaño:
- 3.56 MB
- Formato:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Descripción:
Bloque de licencias
1 - 2 de 2
No hay miniatura disponible
- Nombre:
- license.txt
- Tamaño:
- 1.71 KB
- Formato:
- Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
- Descripción:
No hay miniatura disponible
- Nombre:
- 202403250213093-29 NOV 24 JUAN OSTOS.pdf
- Tamaño:
- 1.38 MB
- Formato:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Descripción:
- Licencia aprobada
