Focused explicit written corrective feedback : improving EFL learners written production.

dc.contributor.advisorMontaño Moreno, Johannaspa
dc.contributor.authorOstos Carrillo, Juan Diego
dc.coverage.spatialBogotáspa
dc.coverage.temporalBogotá, Colombia - 2023-2024.spa
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-11T19:50:34Z
dc.date.available2024-12-11T19:50:34Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.description.abstractThis study investigates the effects of Focused Explicit Written Corrective Feedback (WCF) on the written production of 10th-grade EFL students at Liceo Femenino Mercedes Nariño. Through a mixed-methods approach, the research analyzes both quantitative data from students' writing tasks and qualitative data from questionnaires and interviews. The study involved 16 students, who completed a series of writing tasks over three months. Each task received feedback focusing on specific grammatical issues such as modal verbs, quantifiers, and simple past tense. The results demonstrated a reduction in the number of grammatical errors over time, with most students showing improvement in their writing accuracy. Interviews and questionnaires revealed that WCF impacted students' self-perception and motivation towards writing in English mostly in a positive way. The study highlights the benefits of providing Focused Explicit Written Corrective Feedback, while also acknowledging the challenges some students face in fully integrating it into their learning processes.spa
dc.description.abstractenglishEste estudio investiga los efectos de la Retroalimentación Correctiva Escrita Explícita y Enfocada (WCF, por sus siglas en inglés) en la producción escrita de estudiantes de inglés de décimo grado en el Liceo Femenino Mercedes Nariño. A través de un enfoque de métodos mixtos, la investigación analiza tanto datos cuantitativos de las tareas escritas de los estudiantes como datos cualitativos de cuestionarios y entrevistas. El estudio incluyó a 16 estudiantes, quienes completaron una serie de tareas de escritura a lo largo de tres meses. Cada tarea recibió retroalimentación enfocándose en problemas gramaticales específicos como los verbos modales, cuantificadores y el tiempo pasado simple. Los resultados demostraron una reducción en la cantidad de errores gramaticales a lo largo del tiempo, con la mayoría de los estudiantes mostrando una mejora en la precisión de su escritura. Las entrevistas y cuestionarios revelaron que el WCF tuvo un impacto mayormente positivo en la autopercepción y la motivación de los estudiantes para mejorar su escritura. El estudio destaca los beneficios de proporcionar retroalimentación explícita y enfocada, al tiempo que reconoce los desafíos que algunos estudiantes enfrentan para integrar plenamente la retroalimentación en sus procesos de aprendizaje.spa
dc.description.degreelevelPregradospa
dc.description.degreenameLicenciado en Español y Lenguas Extranjerasspa
dc.description.sponsorshipUniversidad Pedagogica Nacionalspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad Pedagógica Nacionalspa
dc.identifier.reponamereponame: Repositorio Institucional UPNspa
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl: http://repositorio.pedagogica.edu.co/
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12209/20409
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.publisherUniversidad Pedagógica Nacionalspa
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Humanidadesspa
dc.publisher.programLicenciatura en Español y Lenguas Extranjerasspa
dc.relation.referencesAcharya, A., Prakash, A., Saxena, P., & Nigam, A. (2013). Sampling: Why and how of it? Indian Journal of Medical Specialties, 4(2), 330-333.spa
dc.relation.referencesAgustin, M.(2011). Lexical errors and accuracy in foreign language writing. Multilingual Matters.spa
dc.relation.referencesAlimohammadi, B., & Nejadansari, D. (2014). Written corrective feedback: Focused and unfocused. Theory and practice in language studies, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.4.3.581-587spa
dc.relation.referencesAraghi, S., & Sahebkheir, F. (2014). The effect of focused versus unfocused corrective feedback on developing grammatical accuracy of Iranian EFL learners’ written performance within different gender groups. Indian Journal of Fundamental and Applied Life Sciences, 4(S3), 720–729. Retrieved from http://www.cibtech.org/sp.ed/jls/2014/03/jls.htmspa
dc.relation.referencesAshwell, T. (2000). Patterns of teacher response to student writing in a multiple-draft composition classroom: Is content feedback followed by form feedback the best method? Journal of Second Language Writing, 9(3), 227–258.spa
dc.relation.referencesBarabasheva, I. (2021). Feedback As a Means Of Motivation In Foreign Language Teaching. In O. Kolmakova, O. Boginskaya, & S. Grichin (Eds.), Language and Technology in the Interdisciplinary Paradigm, vol 118. European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences (pp. 221-227). European Publisher.spa
dc.relation.referencesBitchener, J. & Ferris, D. (2012). Written Corrective Feedback in Second Language Acquisition and Writing.spa
dc.relation.referencesBlanco, C. (2022, 8 Junio). 10 things all languages have in common. Recuperado 5 de octubre de 2024. https://blog.duolingo.com/language-similarities/#:~:text=3.,and%20languages%20from%20every%20continent.spa
dc.relation.referencesBritish Educational Research Association. (2018). Ethical guidelines for educational research (4th ed.). London, UK: Author.spa
dc.relation.referencesBorko, H., Kuffner, K., Arnold, S., Creighton, L., Stecher, B., Martinez, F., Barnes, D., & Gilbert, M. L. (2007). Using artifacts to describe instruction: Lessons learned from studying reform-oriented instruction in middle school mathematics and science (CRESST Technical Report). CRESST/University of Colorado, Boulder & RAND.spa
dc.relation.referencesBurns, A. (2010). Doing Action Research in Language Teaching: A Guide for Practitioners.spa
dc.relation.referencesCambridge University Press. (2020). Giving feedback to language learners [Cambridge Papers in ELT Series]. Retrieved from https://www.cambridge.org/us/files/4415/8594/0876/Giving_Feedback_minipaper_O NLINE.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesCarey, B. (2014). How we learn: The surprising truth about when, where, and why it happens. Random House.spa
dc.relation.referencesCarr, W., & Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming critical: Education, knowledge and action research. London: Falmer.spa
dc.relation.referencesCarroll, S., & Swain, M. (1993). Explicit and implicit negative feedback: An empirical study of the learning of linguistic generalization. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15(3), 357–386. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100012158spa
dc.relation.referencesCasanave, C. (1994). Language development in students’ journals. Journal of Second Language Writing, 3(3) 179-201. [ Links]spa
dc.relation.referencesÇinar, S. (2017). The Efficacy of Corrective Feedback on L2 Writings of EFL Students. European Journal of Language and Literature Studies, 3(2), N 2411-4103. https://revistia.org/files/articles/ejls_v3_i2_17/Senanur.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesClear, J. (2018). Atomic Habits: an easy & proven way to build good habits & break bad ones (PDF ed.). New York: Avery.spa
dc.relation.referencesCreswell, J. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.spa
dc.relation.referencesCreswell, J., and Vicki L. Plano, C. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. 3rd ed., SAGE Publications, 2017.spa
dc.relation.referencesCreswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.spa
dc.relation.referencesConference of Modern Languages of the Council of Europe (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Companion volume. Cambridge University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesConference of Modern Languages of the Council of Europe (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Cambridge University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesCorder, S. (1967). The significance of learners' errors. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 5(1-4), 161–170spa
dc.relation.referencesCorrea, R. Martínez-Fuentealba, M. Molina de la Barra, M. Silva-Roja, J. & Torres- Cisternas, M. (2013). The Impact of Explicit Feedback on EFL High School Students Engaged in Writing Tasks.spa
dc.relation.referencesCoyne, J. (2009). Why evolution is true. Viking.spa
dc.relation.referencesEllis, R., Loewen, S., & Erlam, R. (2006). Implicit and Explicit Corrective Feedback and the Acquisition of L2 Grammar. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 339-368.spa
dc.relation.referencesEllis, R., Sheen, Y., Murakami, M., & Takashima, H. (2008). The Effects of Focused and Unfocused Written Corrective Feedback in an English as a Foreign Language Context. System, 36, 353-371.spa
dc.relation.referencesFan, N. & Ma, Y. (2018). The Role of Written Corrective Feedback in Second Language Writing Practice. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 8(12), 1629-1635 http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0812.08spa
dc.relation.referencesFashemian, S., & Farhang, P. (2018). Grammatical accuracy and its relationship with overall writing quality in Iranian EFL learners. International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning, 7(2), 35-46.spa
dc.relation.referencesHattie, J. & Timperley, H. (2007) The Power of Feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112. DOI: 10.3102/003465430298487spa
dc.relation.referencesHarmer, J. (2004). How to Teach Writing. Pearson Education.spa
dc.relation.referencesJackson, R. (2009). Never work harder than your students & other principles of great teaching. ASCD.spa
dc.relation.referencesKepner, C. (1991). An experiment in the relationship of types of written feedback to the development of second-language writing skills. The Modern Language Journal, 75(3), 305–313. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1991.tb05359.xspa
dc.relation.referencesKhan, S. (2014). Qualitative Research Method: Grounded Theory. International Journal of Business and Management, 9spa
dc.relation.referencesKrashen, S. (1985). The Input Hypothesis: Issues and Implication. New York: Longman.spa
dc.relation.referencesKineshanko, M. (2016). A thematic synthesis of Community of Inquiry research 2000-2014.spa
dc.relation.referencesKoerber, A., & McMichael, L. (2008). Qualitative sampling methods: A primer for technical communicators. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 22(4), 454–473. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651908320362spa
dc.relation.referencesLaboratorio de Economía de la Educación (LEE) de la Pontificia Universidad Javeriana. (2023). Informe No. 69. Inglés, el factor de competitividad pendiente en Colombia. https://lee.javeriana.edu.co/publicaciones-y-documentosspa
dc.relation.referencesLincoln, Y. & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications.spa
dc.relation.referencesMcKinley, J., & Rose, H. (Eds.). (2023). The Routledge handbook of research methods in applied linguistics. Routledge.spa
dc.relation.referencesMashuri, S. & Sarib, M. & Alhabsyi, F. & Syam, H. & Ruslin, R. (2022). Semi-structured Interview: A Methodological Reflection on the Development of a Qualitative Research Instrument in Educational Studies.spa
dc.relation.referencesMashrah, H. (2017). The role of implicit negative feedback in language development: Some reflections. *International Journal of English Language & Translation Studies*, 5(1), 1-7. http://www.eltsjournal.org/archive/value5%20issue1/1-5-1-17.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesNunan, D. (1995). Language Teaching Technology: A Textbook for Teachers. London: Phoenix ELT.spa
dc.relation.referencesPetchprasert, A. (2012). Feedback in Second Language Teaching and Learning. US-China Foreign Language, 10(4), 1112-1120.spa
dc.relation.referencesPolio, C., & Friedman, D. (2017). Understanding, evaluating, and conducting second language writing research. Second Language Acquisition Research Series.spa
dc.relation.referencesRobert. Yin. (2014). Case study research design and methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 282 pages.https://www.youscience.com/pretest-and-posttest-in-education/spa
dc.relation.referencesRahim, S. & Jaganathan, P. (2022). Languaging, corrective feedback, and writing accuracy among low proficiency L2 learners. REiLA: Journal of Research and Innovation in Language, 4(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.31849/reila.v4i1.7420spa
dc.relation.referencesSaeedakhtar A, Abdi R, Akbari A. The Effect of Focused and Unfocused Written Corrective Feedback on the Accuracy of Iranian learners’ Simple Past Tense. LRR 2021; 12 (1) :43-80spa
dc.relation.referencesSchwartz, B. (1993). On explicit and negative data effecting and affecting competence and "linguistic behavior." Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15(2), 147-163.spa
dc.relation.referencesSheen, Y., Wright, D., & Moldawa, A. (2009). Differential effects of focused and unfocused written correction on the accurate use of grammatical forms by adult ESL learners. System, 37(4), 556–569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2009.09.002spa
dc.relation.referencesSrichanyachon, N. (2012). Teacher Written Feedback for L2 Learners’ Writing Development. Silpakorn University Journal of Social Sciences, Humanities, and Arts, 12(1), 7-17, 2012.spa
dc.relation.referencesStake, R. (2005). Qualitative Case Studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 443–466). Sage Publicationsspa
dc.relation.referencesTanner, D. and Tanner, L. (1980). Curriculum Development: Theory into Practice. New York: Macmillan.spa
dc.relation.referencesTatawy, M. (2002). Corrective Feedback in Second Language Acquisition. Studies in Applied Linguistics & TESOL, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.7916/salt.v2i2.1645spa
dc.relation.referencesTruscott, J. (1996). The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language Learning, 46(2), 327-369spa
dc.relation.referencesUr, P. (2006). A course in language teaching: Practice and theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesVan Beuningen, C. (2011). The effectiveness of comprehensive corrective feedback in second language writing. Universiteit van Amsterdam. https://pure.uva.nl/ws/files/3672639/90090_thesis.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesWaller, L. (2015). Motivation and written corrective feedback: How students' implicit theories of writing intelligence influence their writing motivation and orientation to written corrective feedback. DOI: 10.1016/j.jslw.2017.01.004spa
dc.relation.referencesZeitlhofer, I., Hörmann, S., Mann, B., Hallinger, K., & Zumbach, J. (2023). Effects of cognitive and metacognitive prompts on learning performance in digital learning environments. Knowledge, 3(2), 277-292. https://doi.org/10.3390/knowledge3020019spa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.creativecommonsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectRetroalimentación enfocadaspa
dc.subjectRetroalimentación explícitaspa
dc.subjectPrecisión gramaticalspa
dc.subjectRetroalimentación correctivaspa
dc.subjectAprendizaje de idiomasspa
dc.subjectEnseñanza de idiomasspa
dc.subjectProducción escritaspa
dc.subject.keywordsFocused feedbackeng
dc.subject.keywordsExplicit feedbackeng
dc.subject.keywordsGrammar accuracyeng
dc.subject.keywordsCorrective feedbackeng
dc.subject.keywordsLanguage learningeng
dc.subject.keywordsLanguage teachingeng
dc.subject.keywordsWritten productioneng
dc.titleFocused explicit written corrective feedback : improving EFL learners written production.spa
dc.title.translatedFocused explicit written corrective feedback: improving EFL learners written production.eng
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1feng
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesiseng
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.type.localTesis/Trabajo de grado - Monografía - Pregradospa

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
Feedback research.pdf
Tamaño:
3.56 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 2 de 2
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
1.71 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción:
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
202403250213093-29 NOV 24 JUAN OSTOS.pdf
Tamaño:
1.38 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Licencia aprobada