Interacción en un entorno colaborativo para el trabajo en proyectos sobre Robótica Educativa.

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.advisorMacias Mora, Davidspa
dc.contributor.authorAguilera Avila, Julianaspa
dc.coverage.spatialCota, Cundinamarca, Colombiaspa
dc.coverage.temporalCota, Cundinamarca 2024-2025spa
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-29T19:49:59Z
dc.date.available2025-08-29T19:49:59Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.description.abstractEsta investigación tuvo como objetivo analizar el impacto de la robótica educativa en el fortalecimiento de los procesos de interacción entre estudiantes de quinto grado en un entorno de trabajo colaborativo. Se adoptó un enfoque cualitativo para analizar la dinámica de interacción entre los estudiantes. La intervención se llevó a cabo mediante actividades de aprendizaje basadas en proyectos centradas en la resolución de problemas mediante robótica educativa. Los hallazgos revelaron diversas características de la interacción colaborativa que surgieron durante el desarrollo del proyecto de robótica. Estos resultados sugieren que la dinámica cualitativa del trabajo colaborativo ofrece valiosas perspectivas pedagógicas en el contexto del aprendizaje con tecnologías emergentes.spa
dc.description.abstractenglishThis research aimed to analyze the impact of educational robotics on strengthening interaction processes among fifth-grade students within a collaborative work environment. A qualitative approach was adopted, to analyze the dynamics of interaction among the students. The intervention was carried out through project-based learning activities focused on problem-solving using educational robotics. The findings revealed various characteristics of collaborative interaction that emerged during the development of the robotics project. These results suggest that the qualitative dynamics of collaborative work offer valuable pedagogical insights in the context of learning with emerging technologies.spa
dc.description.degreelevelMaestríaspa
dc.description.degreenameMagister en Tecnologías de la Información aplicadas a la Educaciónspa
dc.formatPDFspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad Pedagógica Nacionalspa
dc.identifier.reponamereponame: Repositorio Institucional UPNspa
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl: http://repositorio.pedagogica.edu.co/
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12209/21425
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisherUniversidad Pedagógica Nacionalspa
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Ciencia y Tecnologíaspa
dc.publisher.programMaestría en Tecnologías de la Información aplicadas a la Educaciónspa
dc.relation.referencesAlimisis, D. (2021). Educational robotics: Development and evaluation of pedagogical approaches and learning environments. Springer.spa
dc.relation.referencesAmes, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 261–271. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.84.3.261spa
dc.relation.referencesAtmatzidou, S., & Demetriadis, S. (2016). Advancing students’ computational thinking skills through educational robotics: A study on age and gender relevant differences. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 75, 661–670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2015.10.0spa
dc.relation.referencesBaker, M., Hansen, T., Joiner, R., & Traum, D. (1999). The role of grounding in collaborative learning tasks. In P. Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches (pp. 31-63). Elsevier.spa
dc.relation.referencesBarker, B. S., & Ansorge, J. (2007). Robotics as Means to Increase Achievement Scores in an Informal Learning Environment. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 39(3), 229-243spa
dc.relation.referencesBarron, B. (2003). When smart groups fail. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(3), 307–359. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327809JLS1203_1spa
dc.relation.referencesBenitti, F. B. V. (2012). Exploring the Educational Potential of Robotics in Schools: A Systematic Review. Computers & Education, 58(3), 978-988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.006spa
dc.relation.referencesBers, M. U. (2008). Blocks to Robots: Learning with Technology in the Early Childhood Classroom. Teachers College Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesBers, M. U. (2020). Beyond coding: How children learn values through programming. The MIT Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesBrazil, D. (1997). The communicative value of intonation in English. Cambridge University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesCazden, C. B. (2001). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning (2nd ed.). Heinemann.spa
dc.relation.referencesChatzichristofis, S. A. (2023). Recent Advances in Educational Robotics. Electronics, 12(4), 925. DOI:10.3390/electronics12040925. Recuperado de https://www.proquest.com/docview/2779542583/1738BBBE6BC84913PQ/1spa
dc.relation.referencesClark, H. H., & Brennan, S. E. (1991). Grounding in communication. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 127-149). American Psychological Associationspa
dc.relation.referencesCastro, E., Ramírez, L., & García, P. (2019). "Robótica educativa en primaria: Promoviendo el aprendizaje a través de la construcción de prototipos". Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnología Educativa, 14(2), 45-59.spa
dc.relation.referencesCrick, N. R., & Dodge, K. A. (1994). A review and reformulation of social information-processing mechanisms in children's social adjustment. Psychological Bulletin, 115(1), 74–101. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.115.1.74spa
dc.relation.referencesDrew, P. y Heritage, J. (eds.) (1992). Talk at Work: interaction in institutional settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesDeutsch, M. (1962). Cooperation and trust: Some theoretical notes. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 10, 275-320.spa
dc.relation.referencesEguchi, A. (2014). Robotics as a Learning Tool for Educational Transformation. In Robotics in Education (pp. 27-34). Springer.spa
dc.relation.referencesEl Tiempo. (2023, septiembre 22). El 40 % de los colegios de Colombia no tiene conexión a internet y el 10 % ni siquiera tiene electricidad: informe. https://www.eltiempo.com/vida/educacion/el-40-de-los-colegios-de-colombia-no-tiene-conexion-a-internet-y-el-10-ni-siquiera-tiene-electricidad-informe-3442963spa
dc.relation.referencesGarcía, J. (2007). Robótica Educativa. La programación como parte de un proceso educativo.spa
dc.relation.referencesGubenko, A., Kirsch, C., Smilek, J. N., Lombard, T., & Houssemand, C. Educational robotics and robot creativity: an interdisciplinary dialogue. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frobt.2021.662030/fullspa
dc.relation.referencesGumperz, J. J. (1982). Discourse strategies. Cambridge University Pressspa
dc.relation.referencesHalliday, M. A. K. (1985). An introduction to functional grammar. Edward Arnold.spa
dc.relation.referencesHeritage, J. (1984). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Polity Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesHighfield, K. (2010). Robotic Toys as a Catalyst for Mathematical Problem Solving. Australian Primary Mathematics Classroom, 15(2), 22-27.spa
dc.relation.referencesHuang, X., & Lajoie, S. P. (2023). Social-emotional interactions in collaborative learning: A review of empirical findings. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 7(1), 100447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100447spa
dc.relation.referencesJefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. En G. H. Lerner (ed.). Conversation Analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp.15-31). Filadelfia: John Benjamins.spa
dc.relation.referencesJohnson, D. W. (1970). The social psychology of education. Educational Researcher, 17(1), 5-10.spa
dc.relation.referencesJohnson, D. W. (1975). Learning together and alone: Cooperation, competition, and individualization. Prentice-Hall.spa
dc.relation.referencesJohnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1999). Learning Together and Alone: Cooperative, Competitive, and Individualistic Learning (5th ed.). Allyn & Bacon.spa
dc.relation.referencesJohnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1979). Cooperation and competition: Theory and research. Interaction Book Company.spa
dc.relation.referencesJohnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1999). Learning Together and Alone: Cooperative, Competitive, and Individualistic Learning. Allyn & Bacon.spa
dc.relation.referencesJohnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2009). An educational psychology success story: Social interdependence theory and cooperative learning. Educational Researcher, 38(5), 365–379. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09339057spa
dc.relation.referencesKoschmann, T. (2002). Dewey's contribution to the foundations of CSCL research. In Proceedings of the Computer Supported Collaborative Learning Conference (pp. 17-22). International Society of the Learning Sciencesspa
dc.relation.referencesLópez-Nicolás, G., Romeo, A., & Guerrero, J. J. Active learning in robotics based on simulation tools. https://webdiis.unizar.es/~glopez/papers/Lopez-NicolasCAE2014.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesMacías Gallo, C., Rojas Vargas, M. M., & Rodríguez López, N. A. (2021). Brechas digitales y exclusión educativa en Colombia: desafíos para una política de educación digital incluyente. Revista Educación y Humanismo, 23(41), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.17081/eduhum.23.41.4767spa
dc.relation.referencesMataric, M. J. (2017). Socially assistive robotics: Human-robot interaction methods for improving quality of life in elder care and rehabilitation. In B. Siciliano & O. Khatib (Eds.), Springer Handbook of Robotics (pp. 2111–2130). Springer.spa
dc.relation.referencesMcHoul, A. (1978). The organization of turns at formal talk in the classroom. Language in Society, 7, 183-213.spa
dc.relation.referencesMcHoul, A. (1990). The Organization of repair in classroom talk. Language in Society, 19(3), 349-377.spa
dc.relation.referencesMercer, N. (2000). Words and minds: How we use language to think together. Routledge.spa
dc.relation.referencesMinisterio de Tecnologías de la Información y las Comunicaciones [MinTIC]. (2018). Resultados programa Computadores para Educar 2010–2018. https://www.mintic.gov.co/portal/715/w3-article-75436.htmlspa
dc.relation.referencesMortimer, E. F., & Scott, P. H. (2003). Meaning making in secondary science classrooms. Open University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesMubin, O., Stevens, C. J., Shahid, S., Al Mahmud, A., & Dong, J.-J. (2013). A Review of the Applicability of Robots in Education. Journal of Technology in Education and Learning, 1, 1-7spa
dc.relation.referencesPapert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas. Basic Books.spa
dc.relation.referencesRoschelle, J., & Teasley, S. D. (1995). The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. In C. O'Malley (Ed.), Computer-supported collaborative learning (pp. 69-97). Springer-Verlag.spa
dc.relation.referencesSalovey, P., & Mayer, J. D. (1990). Emotional intelligence. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 9(3), 185–211. https://doi.org/10.2190/DUGG-P24E-52WK-6CDGspa
dc.relation.referencesStahl, G. (2009a). Studying virtual math teams. Springer.spa
dc.relation.referencesSchiffrin, D. (1994). Approaches to discourse. Blackwell.spa
dc.relation.referencesSchegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesSeedhouse, P. (1996). Classroom interaction: possibilities and impossibilities. ELT Journal, 50(1), 16–24.spa
dc.relation.referencesStahl, G., Koschmann, T., & Suthers, D. (2009). Computer-supported collaborative learning: An historical perspective. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 409-426). Cambridge University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesSmith, B., & MacGregor, J. (1992). What is cooperative learning. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Jean-Macgregor/publication/242282475_What_is_Collaborative_Learning/links/53f279060cf2bc0c40eaa8be/What-is-Collaborative-Learning.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesSucar, L. E., Cárdenas, R. L., & Ledezma, G. M. (2022). Educational robotics and emotional development in children: A systematic review. International Journal of Social Robotics, 14(3), 705–721. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-021-00780-5spa
dc.relation.referencesSullivan, F. R. (2011). Serious and Playful Inquiry: Epistemological Aspects of Collaborative Creativity. Educational Technology & Society, 14(1), 55-65.spa
dc.relation.referencesTarrés-Puertas, M. I., Costa, V., Pedreira Alvarez, M., Lemkow-Tovias, G., & Rossell, J. M. (2023). Child–Robot Interactions Using Educational Robots: An Ethical and Inclusive Perspective. Sensors, 23(3), 1675. DOI:10.3390/s23031675. Recuperado de https://www.proquest.com/docview/2774978795/B9E1EE7CD84B32PQ/5spa
dc.relation.referencesTaylor, K., & Baek, Y. Collaborative Robotics: More Than Just Working in Groups. https://scholarworks.boisestate.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1209&context=edtech_facpubsspa
dc.relation.referencesTendero, E., Gutierrez, R.C., Gonzalez, J.A. (2019). "Robotics in the teaching of knowledge and interaction with the environment. A formative study in Early Childhood Education". Revista Electrónica de Educación, 12(1), 45-62.spa
dc.relation.referencesTobon, L., Arismendy, J., Tamayo, J., Palacios, P., & Rico, E. Training by Projects in an Industrial Robotic Application. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/344733782_Training_by_Projects_in_an_Industrial_Robotic_Application/fulltext/5fabe01b92851cf7dd0df75a/Training-by-Projects-in-an-Industrial-Robotic-Application.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesVygotsky, L. S. (1979). El desarrollo de los procesos psicológicos superiores. Crítica. Viegas, J. (2016). Education y robótica educativa. São Paulo, Brazil.spa
dc.relation.referencesVygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesWells, G. (2006). Dialogic inquiry: Towards a sociocultural practice and theory of education. Cambridge University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesWilliams, D. J., Ma, Y., Prejean, L., Ford, M. J., & Lai, G. (2007). Acquisition of Physics Content Knowledge and Scientific Inquiry Skills in a Robotics Summer Camp. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 40(2), 201-216.spa
dc.rights.accessAcceso abiertospa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.creativecommonsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectRobótica educativaspa
dc.subjectInteracciónspa
dc.subjectTrabajo colaborativospa
dc.subjectAprendizaje basado en proyectosspa
dc.subject.keywordsEducational Roboticseng
dc.subject.keywordsInteractioneng
dc.subject.keywordsCollaborative workeng
dc.subject.keywordsProject-Based Learningeng
dc.titleInteracción en un entorno colaborativo para el trabajo en proyectos sobre Robótica Educativa.spa
dc.title.translatedInteraction within a collaborative enrivonment to work by means of Educational Robotics proyectsspa
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesiseng
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdcceng
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.type.localTesis/Trabajo de grado - Monografía - Maestríaspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.type.versionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
Interacción en un entorno colaborativo para el trabajo en proyectos sobre Robótica Educativa.pdf
Tamaño:
4.34 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Descargar

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 2 de 2
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
1.71 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción:
Descargar
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
202503650153963 - 15 AGO 25 JULIANA AGUILERA.pdf
Tamaño:
239.38 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
licencia aprobada
Descargar

Colecciones

Maestría en Tecnologías de la Información aplicadas a la Educación