El pensamiento creativo en estudiantes para profesores de ciencias: efectos del aprendizaje basado en problemas y en la historia de la ciencia.

dc.contributor.authorDogan, Nihalspa
dc.contributor.authorManassero , María Antoniaspa
dc.contributor.authorVázquez-Alonso, Ángelspa
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-02T16:54:49Z
dc.date.available2021-08-02T16:54:49Z
dc.date.issued2020-07-01
dc.description.abstractEl pensamiento creativo es una habilidad de los seres humanos que se puede desarrollar a través de la educación con material de aprendizaje y enseñanza apropiados. El pensamiento creativo es clave para adaptarse a unas condiciones de vida que cambian rápidamente y para producir soluciones creativas a todo tipo de los problemas de toda clase, y especialmente en el campo de la ciencia y la tecnología. El objetivo de este estudio es mejorar el pensamiento creativo de los estudiantes maestros turcos de ciencias en formación turcos para ser docentes de ciencias a través del aprendizaje basado en problemas (abp) y el enfoque de la historia de la ciencia (hdc). El diseño cuasi-experimental tiene dos grupos experimentales, uno en la condición de aprendizaje abp y el otro grupo en el aprendizaje hdc, ambos de manera explícita y reflexiva con intervenciones que duraron dos semestres con un total de 72 maestros en formación estudiantes de tercer año para ser maestros (8 hombres y 64 mujeres), que completaron el cuestionario de pensamiento creativo de Torrance como instrumento de recolección de datos y después se evaluaron las actuaciones de los dos grupos. Los resultados indican que el enfoque abp fue más efectivo que el enfoque hdc para aumentar el pensamiento creativo y el interés de los estudiantes para maestros en la creatividad. Finalmente, se discuten las implicaciones de estos resultados para mejorar la creatividad de los maestros en formación inicial.spa
dc.description.abstractenglishCreative thinking is a human ability that can be developed through education with appropriate materials for learning and teaching. Creative thinking is ke to adapting to rapidly changing living conditions and to producing creative solutions to any kind of problems, and especially in the field of science and technology. The objective of this study is to improve the creative thinking of Turkish students in initial training as science teachers through Problem Based Learning (abp) and the History of Science (hdc) approaches. The quasi-experimental design has two experimental groups, one in the abp learning condition and the other group in the hdc learning, both explicitly and reflectively. The interventions lasted two semesters and participated 72 third-year students to be teachers (8 men and 64 women) in the two condition groups, who completed the Torrance creative thinking questionnaire as a data collection instrument and whose performances were evaluated. The results indicate that the abp approach was more effective than the hdc approach in increasing creative thinking and student interest for teachers in creativity. Finally, the implications of these results to improve the creativity of teachers in initial training are discussed.eng
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.format.mimetypetext/xmlspa
dc.identifierhttps://revistas.upn.edu.co/index.php/TED/article/view/10926
dc.identifier10.17227/ted.num48-10926
dc.identifier.issn2323-0126
dc.identifier.issn2665-3184
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12209/16242
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisherEditorial Universidad Pedagógica Nacionalspa
dc.relationhttps://revistas.upn.edu.co/index.php/TED/article/view/10926/8937
dc.relationhttps://revistas.upn.edu.co/index.php/TED/article/view/10926/9478
dc.relation.referencesAbd-El-Khalick, F. y Lederman, N. G. (2000). The Influence of history of science courses on students’ views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,37(10), 1057-1095. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200012)37:10<1057::AID-TEA3>3.0.CO;2-Ceng
dc.relation.referencesAlvesson, M. y Sandberg, J. (2011). Generating research questions through problematization. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 247-271.eng
dc.relation.referencesAmbrose, D. y Sternberg, R. J. (Eds.) (2016). Creative Intelligence in the 21st Century. Sense Publishers.eng
dc.relation.referencesAnaniadou, K. y Claro, M. (2009). 21st Century Skills and Competences for New Millennium Learners in oecd Countries. oecd Education Working Papers, 41. https://doi.org/10.1787/19939019eng
dc.relation.referencesAslan, A.E. (2001). Versión turca del test de creatividad de Torrance. [Torrance yaratıcı düşünce testi’nin Türkçe versiyonu]. Marmara Üniversitesi Atatürk Eğitim Fakültesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 14, 19-40.spa
dc.relation.referencesBarak, M. (2006). Teaching methods for systematic inventive problem-solving: Evaluation of a course for teachers. Research in Science and Technological Educa-tion, 24(2), 237–254.eng
dc.relation.referencesBok, D. (2006). Our Underachieving Colleges: A candid look at how much students learn and why they should be learning more. Princeton University Press.eng
dc.relation.referencesBragaw, D. H. y Hartoonian, H. M. (1988). Social studies: The study of people in society. Content of the curriculum: 1988 Yearbook of the association of supervision and curriculum development (ascd). ascd.eng
dc.relation.referencesBurke, P. (1978). Popular culture in early modern Europe. New York University Press.eng
dc.relation.referencesDriver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E. y Scott, P. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23, 5-12. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X023007005eng
dc.relation.referencesDogan, N. y Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2008). Turkish grade 10 students’ and science teachers’ conceptions of nature of science: A national study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45, 1083–1112. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20243eng
dc.relation.referencesDogan, N. (2011). What went wrong? Literature students are more informed about the nature of science than science students. Education & Science, 36(159), 220-235.eng
dc.relation.referencesDogan, N. (2017) Blending problem-based learning and history of science approaches to enhance views about scientific inquiry: new wine in an old bottle. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 5, (10), 99-112.eng
dc.relation.referencesDunbar, K. N. y Klahr, D. (2012). Scientific thinking and reasoning. En K. J. Holyoak y R. G. Morrison (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning (pp. 456-474). Oxford University Presseng
dc.relation.referencesDunlap, J. C. (2005). Changes in students’ use of lifelong learning skills during a pro-blem-based learning project. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 18(1), 5–33.eng
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.creativecommonsAttribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
dc.sourceTecné, Episteme y Didaxis: TED; Núm. 48 (2020): jul-dicspa
dc.sourceTecné, Episteme y Didaxis: TED; No. 48 (2020): jul-dicspa
dc.sourceTecné, Episteme y Didaxis: TED; n. 48 (2020): jul-dicspa
dc.subjectCreatividadspa
dc.subjectProfesores de ciencias en formaciónspa
dc.subjectAprendizaje basado en problemasspa
dc.subjectHistoria de la cienciaspa
dc.subjectTorrance test (TTCT)spa
dc.subject.keywordsCreativityeng
dc.subject.keywordsTorrance test (TTCT)eng
dc.subject.keywordsScience teachers in initial trainingeng
dc.subject.keywordsProblem-based learningeng
dc.subject.keywordsHistory of scienceeng
dc.titleEl pensamiento creativo en estudiantes para profesores de ciencias: efectos del aprendizaje basado en problemas y en la historia de la ciencia.spa
dc.title.translatedCreative thinking in prospective science teachers: effects of problem and history of science based learning.eng
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501eng
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleeng
dc.type.localArtículo de revistaspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

Archivos