Carga cognitiva, autoeficacia y logro de aprendizaje en ambiente virtuales.

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.advisorLópez Vargas, Omarspa
dc.contributor.authorTriana Vera, Soniaspa
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-30T18:49:41Z
dc.date.available2023-11-30T18:49:41Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.description.abstractEl presente estudio, realizado en el marco del énfasis "Sujetos y Escenarios de Aprendizaje" del doctorado Interinstitucional en Educación de la Universidad Pedagógica Nacional, investiga el efecto de andamiajes fijos y de desvanecimiento, así como activadores motivacionales variables e invariables, en logro del aprendizaje, la autoeficacia y la carga cognitiva cuando estudiantes de diferentes estilos cognitivos interactúan con ambientes virtuales de aprendizaje. Se diseñaron cuatro versiones de ambientes virtuales de aprendizaje y se probaron en estudiantes de décimo grado en una institución pública en Soacha, Cundinamarca. Los resultados mostraron que la combinación de experiencias de éxito, gestión de carga cognitiva y adaptabilidad de los activadores motivacionales mejoró el logro de aprendizaje y la autoeficacia. Estos hallazgos enriquecen el conocimiento sobre la mejora de ambientes virtuales de aprendizaje para estudiantes con diferentes estilos cognitivos en un mundo de rápido cambio y gran incertidumbre.spa
dc.description.abstractenglishThe present study, carried out within the framework of the "Subjects and Learning Scenarios" emphasis of the Interinstitutional Doctorate in Education of the National Pedagogical University, investigates the effect of fixed and fading scaffolds, as well as variable and invariable motivational activators, on learning achievement , self-efficacy and cognitive load when students of different cognitive styles interact with virtual learning environments. Four versions of virtual learning environments were designed and tested on tenth grade students at a public institution in Soacha, Cundinamarca. The results showed that the combination of success experiences, cognitive load management and adaptability of motivational activators improved learning achievement and self-efficacy. These findings enrich knowledge about improving virtual learning environments for students with different cognitive styles in a world of rapid change and great uncertainty.eng
dc.description.degreelevelDoctoradospa
dc.description.degreenameDoctor en Educaciónspa
dc.description.researchareaÉnfasis: sujetos y escenarios de aprendizajespa
dc.description.researchareaGrupo: COGNITEKspa
dc.formatPDFspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad Pedagógica Nacionalspa
dc.identifier.reponamereponame: Repositorio Institucional UPNspa
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl: http://repositorio.pedagogica.edu.co/
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12209/18990
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisherUniversidad Pedagógica Nacionalspa
dc.publisher.facultyDoctorado en Educaciónspa
dc.publisher.programDoctorado Interinstitucional en Educaciónspa
dc.relation.referencesAlali, R., & Saleh, S. (2021). E-Learners’ Self-efficacy for Online Courses: Self-efficacy for IT Use as a Predictor for Academic Self-efficacy. Pakistan Journal of Distance & Online Learning, 87–104spa
dc.relation.referencesAlomyan, H. (2004). Individual Differences: Implications for Web-based Learning Design. International Education Journal, 4(4), 188–196. http://iej.cjb.netspa
dc.relation.referencesAlomyan, H. (2017). A conceptual framework for web-based learning design. International Conference e-Learning, 191–195spa
dc.relation.referencesAlqurashi, E. (2016). Self-Efficacy In Online Learning Environments: A Literature Review. Contemporary Issues in Education Research-First Quarter, 9(1)spa
dc.relation.referencesAndrade-Lotero, L. A. (2012). Diseño multimedia y aprendizaje : un estado del arte. Revista Internacional de Investigación En Educación, 5(4), 75–92spa
dc.relation.referencesAngeli, C. (2013). Examining the effects of field dependence-independence on learners’ problem-solving performance and interaction with a computer modeling tool: Implications for the design of joint cognitive systems. Computers and Education, 62, 221–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.11.002spa
dc.relation.referencesAngeli, C. (2015). Instructional design effects and computer modeling software: cognitive style and the split-attention effect. ResearchGate, 155–162spa
dc.relation.referencesAntonenko, P. D., & Niederhauser, D. S. (2010). The influence of leads on cognitive load and learning in a hypertext environment. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(2), 140–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2009.10.014spa
dc.relation.referencesArtino, A. (2008). Cognitive load theory and the role of learner experience: An abbreviated review for educational practitioners. AACE Journal, 16(4), 425–439spa
dc.relation.referencesArtino, A., & McCoach, B. (2008). Development and initial validation of the online learning value and self-efficacy scale. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 38(3), 279–303. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.38.3.cspa
dc.relation.referencesAzevedo, R., Cromley, J. G., & Seibert, D. (2004). Does adaptive scaffolding facilitate students’ ability to regulate their learning with hypermedia? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29(3), 344–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2003.09.002spa
dc.relation.referencesBandura, A. (1994a). Encyclopedia of mental health (Vol. 4). Academic Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesBandura, A. (1994b). Self-Efficacy. In Encyclopedia of human behavior (pp. 71–81). V. S. Ramachaudran. http://www.uky.edu/~eushe2/Bandura/BanEncy.htmlspa
dc.relation.referencesBandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy The Exercise of Control (Primera). Stanford University.spa
dc.relation.referencesBandura, A. (1999). Social cognitive theory : An agentic Albert Bandura. Journal of Social Psychology, 2(1), 21–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-839X.00024spa
dc.relation.referencesBandura, A. (2002). Growing Primacy of Human Agency in Adaptation and Change in the Electronic Era. European Psychologist, 7(1), 2–16. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040.7.1.2spa
dc.relation.referencesBartomeus, G. (2003). The role of cognitive styles in e-learning: a discussion of literature. Skrift från Institutionen för pedagogik, 1, 42–49.spa
dc.relation.referencesBelland, B. R. (2017). Instructional Scaffolding in STEM Education Strategies and Efficacy Evidence (Springer International, Ed.; 1st ed.).spa
dc.relation.referencesBelland, B. R., Lee, E., Zhang, A. Y., & Kim, C. M. (2022). Characterizing the most effective scaffolding approaches in engineering and technology education: A clustering approach. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 30(6), 1795–1812. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22556spa
dc.relation.referencesBerridi-Ramírez, R., & Martínez-Guerrero, J. (2017). Estrategias de autorregulación en contextos virtuales de aprendizaje. Perfiles Educativos, 39(156), 89–102. http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=13250923006spa
dc.relation.referencesBeserra, V., Nussbaum, M., Oteo, M., & Martin, R. (2014). Measuring cognitive load in practicing arithmetic using educational video games on a shared display. Computers in Human Behavior, 41, 351–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.10.016spa
dc.relation.referencesBouffard-Bouchard, T. (1990). Influence of self-efficacy on performance in a cognitive task. Journal of Social Psychology, 130(3), 353–363. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1990.9924591spa
dc.relation.referencesBradley, R., Browne, B., & Kelley, H. (2017). Examining the Influence of Self-Efficacy and Self-Regulation in Online Learning. College Student Journal, 51(4), 518–531. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/325743793spa
dc.relation.referencesBurgos-Torre, K. S., & Salas-Blas, E. (2020). Procrastinación y Autoeficacia académica en estudiantes universitarios limeños. Propósitos y Representaciones, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.20511/pyr2020.v8n3.790spa
dc.relation.referencesCagiltay, K. (2006). Scaffolding strategies in electronic performance support systems: Types and challenges. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 43, 93–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703290500467673spa
dc.relation.referencesCalderín, M., & Csoban, E. (2010). Elementos para un programa de alfabetización informacional: la autoeficacia hacia el uso de las computadoras. Biblios: Revista Electrónica de Bibliotecología, Archivología y Museología, 37, 1-19spa
dc.relation.referencesCamilleri, D., Porter, C., & Micallef, M. (2022). Investigating Cognitive Workload during Comprehension and Application Tasks in Software Testing. Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, SEKE, 237–242. https://doi.org/10.18293/SEKE2022-155spa
dc.relation.referencesCastellanos-Páez, V., Latorre-Velásquez, D. C., Mateus-Gómez, S. M., & Navarro-Roldán, C. P. (2017). Modelo Explicativo del Desempeño Académico desde la Autoeficacia y los Problemas de Conducta. In Revista Colombiana de Psicología, 26(1), pp. 149–161). Universidad Nacional de Colombia. https://doi.org/10.15446/rcp.v26n1.56221spa
dc.relation.referencesÇebi, A., Araújo, R. D., & Brusilovsky, P. (2022). Do individual characteristics affect online learning behaviors? An analysis of learners sequential patterns. Journal of Research on Technology in Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2022.2027301spa
dc.relation.referencesCerino, E. (2014). Relationships Between Academic Motivation, Self-Efficacy, and Academic Procrastination. Psi Chi Journal of Psychological Research., 9(4), 256–263spa
dc.relation.referencesChang, C. C., & Yang, S. T. (2023). Learners’ positive and negative emotion, various cognitive processing, and cognitive effectiveness and efficiency in situated task-centered digital game-based learning with different scaffolds. Interactive Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2209600spa
dc.relation.referencesChen, & Macredie, R. (2002). Cognitive styles and hypermedia navigation: Development of a learning model. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(1), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10023spa
dc.relation.referencesChen, C. M., & Wu, C. H. (2015). Effects of different video lecture types on sustained attention, emotion, cognitive load, and learning performance. Computers and Education, 80, 108–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.08.015spa
dc.relation.referencesChen, F., Zhou, J., Zhou, Y., Yu Kun, Syed Z., Ahmad, A., & Conway Khawaji Dan. (2016). Robust Multimodal Cognitive Load Measurement (Springer International Publishing, Ed.).spa
dc.relation.referencesChen, L. Y., Hsiao, B., Chern, C. C., & Chen, H. G. (2014). Affective mechanisms linking Internet use to learning performance in high school students: A moderated mediation study. Computers in Human Behavior, 35, 431–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.03.025spa
dc.relation.referencesChen, & Wu, C. (2015). Effects of Different Video Lecture Types on Sustained Attention, Emotion, Cognitive Load, and Learning Performance. Computers and Education, 80, 108–121. https://doi.org/10.1109/IIAI-AAI.2015.225spa
dc.relation.referencesCheon, J., Crooks, S., & Chung, S. (2014). Does segmenting principle counteract modality principle in instructional animation? British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(1), 56–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12021spa
dc.relation.referencesChen, Zhou, J., Zhou, Y., Yu, K., Syed, Z., Ahmad, A., & Conway, K. (2016). Robust Multimodal Cognitive Load Measurement (Springer International Publishing, Ed.). http://www.springer.com/series/6033spa
dc.relation.referencesChou, H. W. (2001). Influences of cognitive style and training method on training effectiveness. Computers and Education, 37(1), 11–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1315(01)00028-8spa
dc.relation.referencesColvin Clark, R., & Mayer, R. (2011). E-Learnisn and the science of instruction (Vol. 91).spa
dc.relation.referencesCompeau, D., & Higgins, C. (1995). Computer Self-Efficacy: Development of a Measure and Initial Test. Journal in JSTOR, 19(2), 189–211.spa
dc.relation.referencesCowan, N. (2001). The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(1), 87–114. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X01003922spa
dc.relation.referencesCriollo, M., Romero, M., & Fontaines-Ruiz, T. (2017). Autoeficacia para el aprendizaje de la investigación en estudiantes universitarios. Psicología Educativa, 23(1), 63–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pse.2016.09.002spa
dc.relation.referencesDarejeh, A., Marcus, N., & Sweller, J. (2021). The effect of narrative-based E-learning systems on novice users’ cognitive load while learning software applications. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(5), 2451–2473. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-10024-5spa
dc.relation.referencesDe la Fuente, J., Sander, P., Garzón-Umerenkova, A., Vera-Martínez, M. M., Fadda, S., & Gaeta-González, M. L. (2021). Self-Regulation and Regulatory Teaching as Determinants of Academic Behavioral Confidence and Procrastination in Undergraduate Students. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.602904spa
dc.relation.referencesDerkach, T. M. (2022). ICT-based assessment of cognitive load in chemistry learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2288(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2288/1/012016spa
dc.relation.referencesDixon, H., Hawe, E., & Hamilton, R. (2020). The case for using exemplars to develop academic self-efficacy. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(3), 2–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1666084spa
dc.relation.referencesDoo, M. Y., Bonk, C. J., & Heo, H. (2020). A Meta-Analysis of Scaffolding Effects in Online Learning in Higher Education. In International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning (Vol. 21)spa
dc.relation.referencesFan, X. (2022). The development of EFL Learners’ willingness to communicate and self-efficacy: The role of flipped learning approach with the use of social media. In Frontiers in Psychology (Vol. 13). Frontiers Media S.A. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1001283spa
dc.relation.referencesFlammer, A. (2015). Self-Efficacy. In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences: Second Edition (pp. 504–508). Elsevier Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.25033-2spa
dc.relation.referencesGarrison, D., & Anderson, T. (2003). E-Learning in the 21st Century: A Framework for Research and Practice (RoutledgeFalmer, Ed.; 1st ed.). Taylor & Francis e-Library.spa
dc.relation.referencesGarzón Umerenkova, A., Gil Flores, J., & De Besa Gutiérrez, M. R. (2021). Evidencia de validez de la Escala de Autoeficacia Percibida Específica de Situaciones Académicas (EAPESA). Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa, 23, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.24320/redie.2021.23.e06.2979spa
dc.relation.referencesGerhardt, Megan., & Brown, K. (2006). Individual differences in self-efficacy development: The effects of goal orientation and affectivity. Learning and Individual Differences, 16(1), 43–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2005.06.006spa
dc.relation.referencesGeorge, D. & Mallery, M. (2010). SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference, 17.0 update (10a ed.) Boston: Pearson.spa
dc.relation.referencesGidalevich, S., & Kramarski, B. (2018). The value of fixed versus faded self-regulatory scaffolds on fourth graders’ mathematical problem solving. Instructional Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-018-9475-zspa
dc.relation.referencesGkorezis, P., Kostagiolas, P., & Niakas, D. (2017). Linking exploration to academic performance: The role of information seeking and academic self-efficacy. Library Management, 38(8–9), 404–414. https://doi.org/10.1108/LM-02-2017-0021spa
dc.relation.referencesGreene, J. A., Moos, D. C., Azevedo, R., & Winters, F. I. (2008). Exploring differences between gifted and grade-level students’ use of self-regulatory learning processes with hypermedia. Computers and Education, 50(3), 1069–1083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.10.004spa
dc.relation.referencesHadwin, A., & Winne, P. (2001). CoNoteS2: A software tool for promoting self- regulation. Educational Research and Evaluation, 7(2/3), pp. 313-334.spa
dc.relation.referencesHederich-Martínez, C. (2004). Estilos cognitivos en la dimensión Independencia Dependencia de Campo -Influencias culturales e implicaciones para la educación-. Universidad Autónoma de Barcelonaspa
dc.relation.referencesHederich-Martínez, C., López-Vargas, O., & Camargo-Uribe, A. (2016). Effects of the use of a flexible metacognitive scaffolding on self-regulated learning during virtual education. Int. J. Technology Enhanced Learning, 8(3), 199–216.spa
dc.relation.referencesHederich-Martínez, C., Camargo-Uribe, A., & López-Vargas, O. (2018a). Andamiajes computacionales para favorecer la autorregulación del aprendizaje: una revisión de investigaciones. In Aportes a la investigación sobre educación virtual desde América Latina (Primera, pp. 117–150). Publicaciones Politécnico Grancolombiano.spa
dc.relation.referencesHederich-Martínez, C., Camargo-Uribe, A., & López-Vargas, O. (2018b). Motivation and use of learning strategies in students, men and women, with different level of schooling . Journal of Psychological and Educational Research JPER, 26(1), 121–146.spa
dc.relation.referencesHeidari, K. (2022). A Psycholinguistic Look at the Role of Field Dependence/Independence in Receptive/Productive Vocabulary Knowledge: Does it Draw a Line? Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 51(6), 1393–1408. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-022-09905-4spa
dc.relation.referencesHernández-Jácquez, L. (2018). Perfil sociodemográfico y académico en estudiantes universitarios respecto a su autoeficacia académica percibid. Psicogente, 21(39), 35–49. https://doi.org/10.17081/psico.20.38.2543spa
dc.relation.referencesHori, R., & Fujii, M. (2021). Impact of using ict for learning purposes on self-efficacy and persistence: evidence from pisa 2018. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116463spa
dc.relation.referencesHrastinski, S. (2008). Asynchronous and Synchronous E-Learning. Educase Quartely, 4, 51–55.spa
dc.relation.referencesHuang, Y., Richter, E., Kleickmann, T., & Richter, D. (2023). Comparing video and virtual reality as tools for fostering interest and self-efficacy in classroom management: Results of a pre-registered experiment. British Journal of Educational Technology, 54(2), 467–488. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13254spa
dc.relation.referencesHuertas-Bustos, A. P. (2016). Efecto de un andamiaje metacognitivo para el uso, manejo y búsqueda de información sobre el desarrollo de habilidades metacognitivas y el logro del aprendizaje en el área de la química. [Tesis doctoral Universidad Pedagógica Nacional].spa
dc.relation.referencesHuertas-Bustos, A., López-Vargas, O., & Sanabria-Rodríguez, L. (2018). Effect of a Metacognitive Scaffolding on Information Web Search. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 16(2), 91–106. www.ejel.orgspa
dc.relation.referencesJackson, S. L., Krajcik, J., & Soloway, E. (1998). Design of guided learner-adaptable scaffolding in interactive learning environments. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings, 187–194. https://doi.org/10.1145/274644.274672spa
dc.relation.referencesJamaluddin, M., Mustaji, M., & Bahri, B. S. (2022). Effect of Blended Learning Models and Self-Efficacy on Mathematical Problem-Solving Ability. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 21(7), 127–144. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.7.7spa
dc.relation.referencesJan, S. K. (2015). The relationships between academic self-efficacy, computer self-efficacy, prior experience, and satisfaction with online learning. American Journal of Distance Education, 29(1), 30–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2015.994366spa
dc.relation.referencesJoo, Y.-J., Bong, M., & Choi, H.-J. (2000). Self-Efficacy for Self-Regulated Learning, Academic Self-Efficacy, and Internet Self-Efficacy in Web-Based Instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(2), 5.17.spa
dc.relation.referencesJr, A. A. (2008). Cognitive load theory and the role of learner experience: An abbreviated review for educational practitioners. AACE Journal, 16, 425–439spa
dc.relation.referencesJumaat, N. F., & Tasir, Z. (2014). Instructional scaffolding in online learning environment: A meta-analysis. Proceedings - International Conference on Teaching and Learning in Computing and Engineering, LATICE 2014, 74–77. https://doi.org/10.1109/LaTiCE.2014.22spa
dc.relation.referencesKadir, M. S., Yeung, A. S., Caleon, I. S., Diallo, T. M. O., Forbes, A., & Koh, W. X. (2023). The effects of load reduction instruction on educational outcomes: An intervention study on hands-on inquiry-based learning in science. Applied Cognitive Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.4077spa
dc.relation.referencesKoskinen, A., McMullen, J., Ninaus, M., & Kiili, K. (2023). Does the emotional design of scaffolds enhance learning and motivational outcomes in game-based learning? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 39(1), 77–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12728spa
dc.relation.referencesKotova, E. E. (2021). Management of Cognitive Load in Integrated Educational Environment taking into account the Factor of Visual Uncertainty. Proceedings of 2021 4th International Conference on Control in Technical Systems, CTS 2021, 162–166. https://doi.org/10.1109/CTS53513.2021.9562811spa
dc.relation.referencesKurtovic, A., Vrdoljak, G., & Idzanovic, A. (2019). Predicting procrastination: The role of academic achievement, self-efficacy and perfectionism. International Journal of Educational Psychology, 8(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.17583/ijep.2019.2993spa
dc.relation.referencesLedneva, T., & Kovalev, A. (2021). Cognitive load measurement during navigation and information retrieval in digital text. Procedia Computer Science, 192, 2720–2730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.09.042spa
dc.relation.referencesLee, H.-S., & Songer, N. B. (2004). Expanding an understanding of scaffolding theory using an inquiry-fostering science program. [En prensa], April, 1–66spa
dc.relation.referencesLeppink, J., Paas, F., van Gog, T., van der Vleuten, C. P. M., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., Gog, T. Van, Vleuten, C. P. M. Van Der, & Merriënboer, J. J. G. Van. (2014). Effects of pairs of problems and examples on task performance and different types of cognitive load. Learning and Instruction, 30, 32–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.12.001spa
dc.relation.referencesLiu, C. Y., Li, W., Huang, J. Y., Lei, L. Y., & Zhang, P. R. (2023). Collaborative programming based on social shared regulation: An approach to improving students’ programming achievements and group metacognition. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12828spa
dc.relation.referencesLópez-Vargas, O. (2008). Estilo cognitivo y diseño de ambientes computacionales ponencia. VII Congreso de informática educativa.spa
dc.relation.referencesLópez-Vargas, O., & Hederich-Martínez, C. C. (2010). Efecto de un andamiaje para facilitar el aprendizaje autorregulado en ambientes hipermedia. 58.spa
dc.relation.referencesLópez-Vargas, O., Hederich-Martínez, C., & Camargo-Uribe, Á. (2011). Estilo cognitivo y logro académico. Educación y .Educadores. Universidad de La Sabana , 14(1), 67–82spa
dc.relation.referencesLópez-Vargas, O., Hederich-Martínez, C., & Camargo-Uribe, Á. (2012a). Logro de aprendizaje en ambientes hipermediales: andamiaje autorregulador y estilo cognitivo. Revista latinoamericana de Psicología, 44, 13–26. http://www.scielo.org.co/pdf/rlps/v44n2/v44n2a02.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesLópez-Vargas, O., Hederich-Martínez, C., & Camargo-Uribe, Á. (2012b). Logro en matemáticas, autorregulación del aprendizaje y estilo cognitivo. Suma Psicológica, 19(2), 39–50.spa
dc.relation.referencesLópez-Vargas, O., & Valencia-Vallejo, N. (2012). Individual Differences in the Development of Self-Efficacy and. Acta Colombiana de Psicología, 15(11), 29–41.spa
dc.relation.referencesLópez-Vargas, O., & Triana-Vera, S. (2013). Efecto de un activador computacional de autoeficacia sobre el logro de aprendizaje en estudiantes de diferente estilo cognitivo. Revista Colombiana de Educación, 64(1), 225–244. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erh145spa
dc.relation.referencesLópez-Vargas, O. (2014). Diseño de andamiajes computacionales para apoyar la autonomía en el aprendizaje. In Universidad Pedagógica Nacional (Ed.), Cátedra doctoral 3spa
dc.relation.referencesLópez-Vargas, O., Sanabria-Rodríguez, L. B., & Sanabria-Español, M. (2014). Logro de aprendizaje en ambientes computacionales : Autoeficacia , metas y estilo cognitivo. Psicología Desde Le Caribe, 31(3), 475–494.spa
dc.relation.referencesLópez-Vargas, O., Ibáñez-Ibáñez, J., & Racines-Prada, O. (2017). Students’ Metacognition and Cognitive Style and Their Effect on Cognitive Load and Learning Achievement. In Educational Technology & Society (Vol. 20, Issue 3).spa
dc.relation.referencesLópez-Vargas, O., Sanabria-Rodríguez, L., & Buitrago-González, N. (2018). Efecto diferencial de un andamiaje metacognitivo sobre la autorregulación y el logro de aprendizaje en un ambiente de aprendizaje combinado. Tecné Epistemedidaxis, 44, 33–50.spa
dc.relation.referencesLópez-Vargas, O., Ortiz-Vásquez, J., & Ibáñez-Ibáñez, J. (2020). Autoeficacia y logro de aprendizaje en estudiantes con diferente estilo cognitivo en un ambiente m-learning. Pensamiento Psicológico, 18(1), 71–85. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javerianacali.PPSI18-1.alaespa
dc.relation.referencesLópez-Vargas, O., Bermúdez-Martínez, M., & Sanabria-Rodríguez, L. (2022). Autoeficacia y logro de aprendizaje en estudiantes con diferente estilo cognitivo en un videojuego. Revista Colombiana de Educación, 1(85).spa
dc.relation.referencesMayer, R. (2010). Applying the science of learning to medical education. Medical Education, 44(6), 543–549. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03624.spa
dc.relation.referencesMcNeill, K. L., Lizotte, D. J., Krajcik, J., & Marx, R. W. (2006). Supporting students’ construction of scientific explanations by fading scaffolds in instructional materials. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(2), 153–191. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1502_1spa
dc.relation.referencesMertler, C. A., & Vannatta, R. A. (2017). Advanced and multivariate statistical methods : practical application and interpretation (Sexta).spa
dc.relation.referencesMillonado-Valdez, J., & Datu, J. (2023). Does Facebook intensity matter for academic self-efficacy? A path analytic approach. Technology Enhanced Learning (Vol. 18).spa
dc.relation.referencesMoos, D., & Azevedo, R. (2009). Self-efficacy and prior domain knowledge: To what extent does monitoring mediate their relationship with hypermedia learning? Metacognition and Learning, 4(3), 197–216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-009-9045-5spa
dc.relation.referencesMui, C. (2016). The trend and delivery architecture of e-learning system. In E-Systems for the 21st Century: Concept, Developments, and Applications (pp. 84–104).spa
dc.relation.referencesMulton, K., Brown, S., & Lent, R. W. (1991). Relation of Self-Efficacy Beliefs to Academic Outcomes: A Meta-Analytic Investigation. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38(1), 30–38.spa
dc.relation.referencesMurphy, Christine., Coover, D., & Owen, S. (1989). Development and Validation of the Computer Self-Efficacy Scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 49(4), 893–899. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316448904900412spa
dc.relation.referencesNiño-Ramos, M. (2019). Personalización de un ambiente educativo digital y su efecto sobre el logro de aprendizaje y la percepción en estudiantes de primaria diferenciados por su estilo cognitivo [Tesis doctoral Universidad Pedagógica Nacional].spa
dc.relation.referencesNong, W., Ye, J. H., Chen, P., & Lee, Y. S. (2023). A study on the blended learning effects on students majoring in preschool education in the post-pandemic era: An example of a research-method course in a Chinese university. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.962707spa
dc.relation.referencesNori, R., Boccia, M., Palmiero, M., & Piccardi, L. (2023). The contribution of field independence in virtual spatial updating. Current Psychology, 4567–4576. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01788-3/Publishedspa
dc.relation.referencesNozari, A., & Siamian, H. (2015). The Relationship between Field Dependent-Independent Cognitive Style and Understanding of English Text Reading and Academic Success. Materia Socio Medica, 27(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.5455/msm.2014.27.39-41spa
dc.relation.referencesOlaz, F. (2001). La Teoría Social Cognitiva de la Autoeficacia. Contribuciones a la Explicación del Comportamiento vocacional. https://www.uky.edu/~eushe2/Pajares/olaz.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesOwn, C. M., Cai, T., & Hung, C. Y. (2023). Exploring the Potential of Tangible and Multitouch Interfaces to Promote Learning Among Preschool Children. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 16(1), 66–77. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2022.3170031spa
dc.relation.referencesPajares, F. (1996). Self-Efficacy Beliefs in Academic Settings Author. American Educational Research Association, 66(4), 543–578.spa
dc.relation.referencesPajares, F., & Miller David. (1995). Mathematics Self-Efficacy and Mathematic Performances:The Need for Specificity of Assessment. Journal of Counseling Psycology, 42, 190–198.spa
dc.relation.referencesPark, B., Moreno, R., Seufert, T., & Brünken, R. (2011). Does cognitive load moderate the seductive details effect? A multimedia study. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(1), 5–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.05.006spa
dc.relation.referencesPea, R. D. (2004). The social and technological dimensions of scaffolding and related theoretical concepts for learning, education, and human activity. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), 423–451. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1303_6spa
dc.relation.referencesPeechapol, C., Na-Songkhla, J., Sujiva, S., & Luangsodsai, A. (2018). An exploration of factors influencing self-efficacy in online learning: A systematic review. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 13(9), 64–86. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v13i09.8351spa
dc.relation.referencesPellas, N. (2023). Exploring relationships among students’ computational thinking skills, emotions, and cognitive load using simulation games in primary education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12819spa
dc.relation.referencesPintrich, P., Smith, D., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. (1991). A manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Ann Arbor. Michigan, 48109(August 2016), 1259. https://doi.org/ED338122spa
dc.relation.referencesPituch K. A., Stevens J. P. (2015). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences: Analyses with SAS and IBM's SPSS (6th ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.spa
dc.relation.referencesPrieto-Navarro, L. (2012). Autoeficacia del profesor universitario (S. A. E. Narcea, Ed.; 1st ed.).spa
dc.relation.referencesPrineas, M., Foreword, M. C., Ewell, P., & Cini, M. (2011). National Institute for Learning Outcomes Assessment | 1 Assessing Learning in Online Education: The Role of Technology in Improving Student Outcomes National Institute for Learning Outcomes Assessment About the Authors.spa
dc.relation.referencesPuzziferro, M. (2008). Online technologies self-efficacy and self-regulated learning as predictors of final grade and satisfaction in college-level online courses. International Journal of Phytoremediation, 21(1), 72–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923640802039024spa
dc.relation.referencesQuintero-Manes, R., Vieira, C., & Hernandez-Vargas, N. (2022). Measuring Cognitive Loads while Learning Computational Statistics. Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE, 2022-October. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE56618.2022.9962606spa
dc.relation.referencesRatsameemonthon, L., Ho, R., Tuicomepee, A., & Blauw, J. (2018). Influence of achievement goals and academic self-efficacy on academic achievement of Thai undergraduate students: Across non procrastinators and procrastinators. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 16(45), 243–271. https://doi.org/10.25115/ejrep.v16i45.2093spa
dc.relation.referencesRoces, C., & González, M. (1998). Capacidad de autorregulación del proceso de aprendizaje. En Pirámide (Ed.), Dificultades de aprendizaje escolar.spa
dc.relation.referencesRodríguez-Guardado, M. del S., & Gaeta-González, M. L. (2020). Perfiles motivacionales, estrategias volitivas y rendimiento académico en ciencias exactas y experimentales de bachillerato. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 18(51), 207–224.spa
dc.relation.referencesSánchez-Rosas, J. (2013). Búsqueda de Ayuda Académica, Autoeficacia Social Académica y Emociones deLogro en Clase en Estudiantes Universitarios. Revista Argentina de Ciencias Del Comportamiento, 5(1), 35–41. www.psyche.unc.edu.ar/raccspa
dc.relation.referencesSawa, H. (1966). Bunseki shikó to sógó shikó [Analytic thinking and synthetic thinking]. Bulletin of Faculty of Education, Nagasaki University, 13, 1–16.Schimmenti, A., Infanti, A., Badoud, D., Laloyaux, J. y Billieux, J. (2017). Schizotypal personality traits and problematic use of massively-multiplayer online role-playing games (mmorpgs). Computers in Human Behavior, 74, 286-293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.04.048spa
dc.relation.referencesSchellens, T., & Valcke, M. (2005). Collaborative learning in asynchronous discussion groups: What about the impact on cognitive processing? Computers in Human Behavior, 21(6), 957–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2004.02.025spa
dc.relation.referencesSchunk, D. H. (1990). Goal Setting and Self-Efficacy During Self-Regulated Learning. Educational Psychologist, 26(71–86). http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/spa
dc.relation.referencesSchunk, D. H. (2012). Teorías del aprendizaje : una perspectiva educativa (Sexta). Pearson Educación.spa
dc.relation.referencesSchunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (1994). Self-regulation in education: retrospect and prospect. Issues and Educational Applications.spa
dc.relation.referencesSins, P. H. M., Van-Joolingen, W. R., Savelsbergh, E. R., & Van-Hout-Wolters, B. (2008). Motivation and performance within a collaborative computer-based modeling task: Relations between students’ achievement goal orientation, self-efficacy, cognitive processing, and achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(1), 58–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2006.12.004spa
dc.relation.referencesSolórzano-Restrepo, J., & López-Vargas, O. (2019). Differential effect of a metacognitive scaffolding in a e-Learning environment over cognitive load, learning achievement and metacognitive consciousness. Suma Psicológica, 26(1), 37–45. https://doi.org/10.14349/sumapsi.2019.v26.n1.5spa
dc.relation.referencesSong, D., & Glazewski, K. (2023). Scaffolding self-regulated learning in student-generated questioning using mobile phones. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11627-6spa
dc.relation.referencesStephen, J. S., & Rockinson-Szapkiw, A. J. (2021). A high-impact practice for online students: the use of a first-semester seminar course to promote self-regulation, self-direction, online learning self-efficacy. Smart Learning Environments, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-021-00151-0spa
dc.relation.referencesSun, J. C. Y., Liu, Y., Lin, X., & Hu, X. (2023). Temporal learning analytics to explore traces of self-regulated learning behaviors and their associations with learning performance, cognitive load, and student engagement in an asynchronous online course. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1096337spa
dc.relation.referencesSuryani, Y., Ningrum, A. R., Hidayah, N., & Dewi, N. R. (2021). The effectiveness of blended learning-based scaffolding strategy assisted by google classroom toward the learning outcomes and students’ self-efficacy. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1796(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1796/1/012031spa
dc.relation.referencesSweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (2008). Explorations in the Learning Sciences , Instructional Systems and Performance Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8517-0spa
dc.relation.referencesTeng, M. F., & Ying, Z. (2023). Assessing self-regulated writing strategies, self-efficacy, task complexity, and performance in English academic writing. Assessing Writing, 57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2023.100728spa
dc.relation.referencesTinajero, C., Castelo, A., Guisande, A., & Páramo, F. (2011). Adaptive teaching and field dependence-independence Adaptive Teaching and Field Dependence-Independence: Instructional Implications Enseñanza adaptativa y dependencia-independencia de campo: implicaciones instruccionales. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 43(3), 497–510spa
dc.relation.referencesTrevors, G., Duffy, M., & Azevedo, R. (2014). Note-taking within MetaTutor: interactions between an intelligent tutoring system and prior knowledge on note-taking and learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 62(5), 507–528. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-014-9343-8spa
dc.relation.referencesTriana-Vera, S. (2012). Autoeficacia, estilo cognitivo y logro académico en ambientes computacionales. Universidad Pedagógica Nacional.spa
dc.relation.referencesTriana-Vera, S., & López-Vargas, O. (2023). Autoeficacia y logro académico en ambientes virtuales de aprendizaje. Plumilla Educativa Universidad de Manizales, 31(1), 7–32. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2298-spa
dc.relation.referencesTsai, M. J., & Tsai, C. C. (2003). Information searching strategies in Web-based science learning: The role of Internet self-efficacy. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 40(1), 43–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/1355800032000038822spa
dc.relation.referencesUsher, E., & Pajares, F. (2008). Sources of Self-Efficacy in school: Critical review of the literature and future directions. Review of Educational Research, 78(4), 751–796. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308321456spa
dc.relation.referencesValdés-Cuervo, Ángel, Cervantes-Arreola, D., Valadez-Sierra, M., & Quintana, J. (2018). Diferencias en autoeficacia académica, bienestar psicológico y motivación al logro en estudiantes universitarios con alto y bajo desempeño académico. Psicología Desde El Caribe, 35(1).spa
dc.relation.referencesValencia-Vallejo, N. (2017). Autoeficacia académica, capacidad metacognitiva, logro de aprendizaje y estilo cognitivo en ambientes e-learning. [Tesis doctoral, Universidad Pedagógica Nacional].spa
dc.relation.referencesValencia-Vallejo, N., López-Vargas, O., & Sanabria-Rodríguez, L. (2016). Self-Efficacy in Computer-Based Learning Environments: A Bibliometric Analysis. Psychology, 7(14), 1839–1857. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2016.714170spa
dc.relation.referencesValencia-Vallejo, N., López-Vargas, O., & Sanabria-Rodríguez, L. (2018). Effect of a motivational scaffolding on e-learning environments: self-efficacy, learning achievement, and cognitive style. Journal Educators On-Line, 15(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.9743/JEO2018.15.1.5spa
dc.relation.referencesValencia-Vallejo, N., López-Vargas, O., & Sanabria-Rodríguez, L. (2019). Effect of a metacognitive scaffolding on self-efficacy, metacognition, and achievement in e-learning environments. Knowledge Management & E-Learning: An International Journal (KM&EL) Knowledge Management & E-Learning, 11(1), 1–19.spa
dc.relation.referencesWang, P., Hawk, W. B., & Tenopir, C. (2000). Users’ interaction with World Wide Web resources: an exploratory study using a holistic approach. Information Processing and Management, 36, 229–251.spa
dc.relation.referencesWang, A. Y., & Newlin, M. H. (2002). Predictors of web-student performance: The role of self-efficacy and reasons for taking an on-line class. Computers in Human Behavior, 18(2), 151–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0747-5632(01)00042-5spa
dc.relation.referencesWecker, C., Kollar, I., Fischer, F., & Prechtl, H. (2010). Fostering Online Search Competence and Domain-Specific Knowledge in Inquiry Classrooms: Effects of Continuous and Fading Collaboration Scripts. https://doi.org/https://doi.dx.org/10.22318/icls2010.1.810spa
dc.relation.referencesWeller, H., Repman, J., Lan, W., & Rooze, G. (1995). Improving the Effectiveness of Learning Through Hypermedia-Based Instruction: The Importance of Learner Characteristics. Computers in Human Behavior, 11(4), 451–465.spa
dc.relation.referencesWinter, V., Friend, M., Matthews, M., Love, B., & Vasireddy, S. (2019). Using Visualization to Reduce the Cognitive Load of Threshold Concepts in Computer Programming.spa
dc.relation.referencesWitkin, H., Moore, C., Goodenough, D., & Cox, P. (1977). Field-Dependent and Field-Independent Cognitive Styles and Their Educational Implications. Review of Educational Research, 47(1), 1–64.spa
dc.relation.referencesYavuzalp, N., & Bahcivan, E. (2020). The online learning self-efficacy scale: Its adaptation into turkish and interpretation according to various variables. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education-TOJDE , 21(1), 31–44.spa
dc.relation.referencesYeh, Y., Ting, Y.-S., & Chiang, J.-L. (2021). Influences of Growth Mindset, Fixed Mindset, Grit, and Self determination on Self efficacy in Game based Creativity Learning. Educational Technology & Society, 1(26), 62–78.spa
dc.relation.referencesYou, J. W. (2018). Testing the three-way interaction effect of academic stress, academic self-efficacy, and task value on persistence in learning among Korean college students. Higher Education, 76(5), 921–935. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0255-0spa
dc.relation.referencesYukselturk, E., & Bulut, S. (2007). Predictors for Student Success in an Online Course. In Educational Technology & Society (Vol. 10, Issue 2).spa
dc.relation.referencesZhang, J. H., Meng, B., Zou, L. C., Zhu, Y., & Hwang, G. J. (2021). Progressive flowchart development scaffolding to improve university students’ computational thinking and programming self-efficacy. Interactive Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1943687spa
dc.relation.referencesZhang, J., & Tian, Y. (2019). The influence of field independent-dependent cognitive styles on students’ learning performance under different teaching modes. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, Part F148391, 230–237. https://doi.org/10.1145/3323771.3323827spa
dc.relation.referencesZheng, Robert. (2009). Cognitive effects of multimedia learning. Information Science Reference.spa
dc.relation.referencesZhu, Y. Q., Chen, L. Y., Chen, H. G., & Chern, C. C. (2011). How does Internet information seeking help academic performance? - The moderating and mediating roles of academic self-efficacy. Computers and Education, 57(4), 2476–2484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.07.006spa
dc.relation.referencesZimmerman, B. J. (1995). Self-efficacy and educational development. In A. Bandura (Ed.), Self-efficacy in Changing Societies (Tercera). Cambridge University Press. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/247480203spa
dc.relation.referencesZimmerman, B., & Campillo, M. (2003). Motivating Self-Regulated Problem Solvers. The Psychology of Problem Solving, 233–262. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615771.009spa
dc.relation.referencesZimmerman, W., & Kulikowich, J. (2016). Online Learning Self-Efficacy in Students With and Without Online Learning Experience. American Journal of Distance Education, 30(3), 180–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2016.1193801spa
dc.relation.referencesZimmerman, W. (2017). Predicting Success in an Online Course using Expectancies, Values, and Typical Mode of Instruction. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Edication, 32(1), 2–20.spa
dc.rights.accessAcceso abiertospa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.creativecommonsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectCarga cognitivaspa
dc.subjectLogro de aprendizajespa
dc.subjectAutoeficaciaspa
dc.subjectEstilo cognitivospa
dc.subject.keywordsCognitive loadeng
dc.subject.keywordsVirtual Learning Environment (VLE)eng
dc.subject.keywordsLearning achievementeng
dc.subject.keywordsSelf - Efficacyeng
dc.subject.keywordsCognitive styleeng
dc.subject.lembAmbientes virtuales de aprendizajespa
dc.subject.lembEstilos cognitivosspa
dc.subject.lembEducación secundariaspa
dc.subject.lembEnseñanza con ayuda de computadoresspa
dc.titleCarga cognitiva, autoeficacia y logro de aprendizaje en ambiente virtuales.spa
dc.title.translatedCognitive load, self-efficacy and learning achievement in virtual environments.eng
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_db06eng
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesiseng
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.type.localMonografía - Doctoradospa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.type.versionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
Carga cognitiva, Autoeficacia y Logro de Aprendizaje en Ambientes vituales de Aprendizaje.pdf
Tamaño:
4.42 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Descargar

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 2 de 2
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
1.71 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción:
Descargar
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
202303780211743-01 NOV 23 SONIA TRIANA.pdf
Tamaño:
349.05 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
LICENCIA APROBADA
Descargar

Colecciones

Doctorado Interinstitucional en Educación