Análisis histórico en torno a la controversia Eddington-Chandrashekar.

dc.contributor.advisorOrozco González, Francisco Javierspa
dc.contributor.authorMoreno Castro, Brayan Estivenspa
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-22T15:14:22Z
dc.date.available2026-07-22T15:14:22Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.description.abstractTrabajo de grado referente al analisis histórico de la controversia Eddington-Chandrashekar a partir de estudio disciplinar, pedagógico, filosófico y sociológico del como se llevó a cabo la controversia sobre el límite de masa de las estrellas enanas blancas.spa
dc.description.abstractenglishThesis work concerning the historical analysis of the Eddington-Chandrashekar controversy based on a disciplinary, pedagogical, philosophical and sociological study of how the controversy on the mass limit of white dwarf stars was carried out.eng
dc.description.degreelevelPregradospa
dc.description.degreenameLicenciado en Físicaspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad Pedagógica Nacionalspa
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Pedagógica Nacionalspa
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl: http://repositorio.pedagogica.edu.co/
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12209/22568
dc.language.isoes
dc.publisherUniversidad Pedagógica Nacionalspa
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Ciencia y Tecnologíaspa
dc.publisher.programLicenciatura en Físicaspa
dc.relation.referencesAdams, W. (1915). The physical properties of the compation of Sirius. Astrophysical Journal, 42, 179-188.
dc.relation.referencesAyala. (2006). Los análisis histórico-críticos y la recontextualización de saberes científicos construyendo. 1-8.
dc.relation.referencesAyala, M. M. (2013). Enseñanza de las ciencias desde una perspectiva cultural.
dc.relation.referencesB. Latour. (1987). Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Enginners Through Society. California: Harvard University Press.
dc.relation.referencesBloor, D. (1991). Knowledge and Social Imagery. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
dc.relation.referencesCardona Torres, P. A. (2023). ¿Astrofísica en la escuela?:Una propuesta para la enseñanza de la física de agujeros negros en la educación media. Universidad Pedagógica Nacional, Bogotá.
dc.relation.referencesCastillo, J. C. (2005). Institucionalización, desarrollo y enseñanza de la física en Colombia. Universidad Pedagógica Nacional.
dc.relation.referencesChandrasekhar. (1929). Chnadrasekhar To Fatter. Chandrasekhar Archive
dc.relation.referencesChandrasekhar. (1930). Chandrasekhar Archive. Chandrasekhar Archive, 293 firt footnote
dc.relation.referencesChandrasekhar. (1930). Letter To Father. Chandrasekhar Archive, Box 70/ Folder 6.
dc.relation.referencesChandrasekhar. (1931, April 31). Letter of 30 April 1931. Chandrasekhar Archive.
dc.relation.referencesChandrasekhar, S. (1983). Eddington The Most Distinghised Astrophysic. Cambridge
dc.relation.referencesClark. (1862). Discovery of the comparation to Sirius. Dans A. Clark, Discovery of the comparation to Sirius (pp. 1-3). Nueva York: Proceedings of the Amercian Academy of Arts and Sciences.
dc.relation.referencesD. C. Cassidy. (1992). Unvertainy: The life and sicence of Werner Heisenberg. Múnich: W.H. Freeman.
dc.relation.referencesEddington. (1935a). Relativistic degeneracy. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 95(6),673-676.
dc.relation.referencesEddington, A. (1926). The Internal Constitution of the Stars. Cambridge: University Press.
dc.relation.referencesGopal, P. (2019). Insurgent empire: Anticolonial resistance and British dissent. Nueva Delhi: Verso B
dc.relation.referencesGranés, J. (1997). Del contexto de la producción de conocimientos al contexto de la enseñanza. Revista Colombiana de Educación.
dc.relation.referencesGuha, R. (2019). Ghandi: The Years That Changed The World. Penguin Random House
dc.relation.referencesGulabray V. S., V. P. (2024). Orientalist scholarship and empire: British intellectual engagement with India. Shodkosh: Journal of Visual and Performing Arts, 5*(2)1 1521-1528.
dc.relation.referencesHarker. (2015). Creating Scientific Controversies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
dc.relation.referencesK. Harper. (2018). The 1919 Solar Eclipse Expedition: An Icon of Science and Diplomacy. Journal of the History of Astronomy, 49(2), 215-237.
dc.relation.referencesKilmister. (1936). Eddington and the degeneracy problem. PRoceedings of the Royal
dc.relation.referencesKilmister, C. W. (1966). Men of Physics: Sir Arthur Eddington. London: Pergamon Press Ltd.
dc.relation.referencesKohlstedt, S. (2011). The power of scientific networks: Shaping knoeledge in the nineteenth century. Dans S. Kohlstedt, The power of scientific networks: Shaping knoeledge in the nineteenth century (pp. 49(2), 217-242)
dc.relation.referencesKuhn. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
dc.relation.referencesLaudan, L. (1983). Physics, Philosophy and Phychoanalisis. Dorrecht, Holland: Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data.
dc.relation.referencesLopez, E. B. (2015). La evolucíon estelar, Chandrasekhar. Villanueva, Navarra: National Geographic.
dc.relation.referencesM. Stanley. (2003). Constructing a 'Revolution in Sicence': The Campaign to Promote Eddington's Eclipse Expedition in Britain. Dans M. Stanley, Constructing a 'Revolution in Sicence': The Campaign to Promote Eddington's Eclipse Expedition in Britain (pp. 36(4), 441-259). Cambridge: British Journal for the History of Science.
dc.relation.referencesMannheim, K. (1952). Essays on the Sociology of Knowledge. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
dc.relation.referencesMEN, M. d. (1998). Serie lineamientos curriculares. Bogotá D.C
dc.relation.referencesMerton, R. K. (1973). The Sociology of Science. Theorical and Empirical Investigations. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
dc.relation.referencesMilne, E. A. (1931, January 29). Letter of 29 January 1931, Milne to Chandrasekhar. Milne Archive.
dc.relation.referencesN. Oerkes. (1999). The rejection of continetal drift. Dans N. Oerkes, The rejection of continetal drift. (pp. 132-164). Nueva York: Historical studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences.
dc.relation.referencesOrozco, J. (2005). Los estudios histórico-críticos y la enseñanza de las ciencias. Atajos y desviaciones.
dc.relation.referencesOsborne, M. Monk & J. (1997). Placing the History and Philosophy of Science on the Curriculum: A Model for he Development of Pedagogy. Dans M. Monk, Placing the History and Philosophy of Science on the Curriculum: A Model for he Development of Pedagogy (p. 81). Science Education.
dc.relation.referencesPulido, A. C. (2016). Derechos Básicos de Aprendizaje (DBA V.1) Ciencias Sociales.
dc.relation.referencesR. K. Merton. (1942). Science and Technology in a Democratic Order. Dans R. K. Merton, Science and Technology in a Democratic Order (pp. 115-126). Journal of Legal and Politicak Sociology.
dc.relation.referencesRaynaud, D. (2015). Scientific Controversies: A Socio-Historical Perspective on the Advancement of Sciencce. Transaction Publishers.
dc.relation.referencesReichenbach, H. (1973). Experiencia y predicción: un análisis de los fundamentos y la estructura del conocimiento. Editorial Tecnos
dc.relation.referencesRitchie, A. (1947). Reflections on the Philosophy of Sir Arthur Eddington. Cambridge:
dc.relation.referencesScheler, M. (1984). Problémes de sociologie de la connaissance. Paris: Pressses Universitaires de Paris.
dc.relation.referencesSnow. (1959). The Two Cultures and The Scientific Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.relation.referencesV. Laiviere. (2009). Scientific controversies: Theory and practice. Dans V. Laiviere, Scientific controversies: Theory and practice (pp. 39(1), 3-17). Social Studies of Science.
dc.relation.referencesVenkataraman, G. (1992). Chandrasekhar and his limit.
dc.relation.referencesW. S. Adams. (1914). Photographic observations of Sirius B. Monthly Notices of the Royal AStronomical Society, 74, 45-52.
dc.relation.referencesWali, K. (2010). A Scientific Autobiography: S. Chandrasekhar. Dans K. Wali, A Scientific Autobiography: S. Chandrasekhar (p. 76). Sinpagore: World Scientific Published
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.creativecommonsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.sourcereponame:Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Pedagógica Nacionalspa
dc.sourceinstname:Universidad Pedagógica Nacionalspa
dc.subjectEnanas blancasspa
dc.subjectAnálisis históricospa
dc.subjectEstudio sociólogicospa
dc.subjectAstrofísicaspa
dc.subjectAstronomíaspa
dc.subject.keywordsAstronomyeng
dc.subject.keywordsAstrophysicseng
dc.subject.keywordsHistorical analysiseng
dc.titleAnálisis histórico en torno a la controversia Eddington-Chandrashekar.spa
dc.title.translatedHistorical analysis surrounding the Eddington-Chandrashekar controversy.eng
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesisspa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1feng
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesiseng
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.type.localTesis/Trabajo de grado - Monografía - Pregradospa

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
Analisis historico.pdf
Tamaño:
794.97 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 2 de 2
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
1.71 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción:
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
202603600116383 27MAY2026 BRAYAN MORENO.pdf
Tamaño:
329.96 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
LICENCIA APROBADA